Space Opera Fans discussion
Book and Author of the Month
>
BOTM rules change discussion
date
newest »



Books are supposed to not be kindle exclusive. Would you like to check the nominations for ones that aren't on kobo and let us know?

I didn't do any checking of the most recent nominations for availability. I'm not sure I have the patience to do that regularly. I'd love to have an official availability checker, if someone wants the job.



:D
Perhaps we should have a compromise, where READER category books have to be in print as paperback and multiple ebook versions, and INDY needs at least two platforms of some kind. Or just include info in the nominations thread about limitations of availability for a given book, and those who want to second it would then take that into account.
Methinks for a few rounds of nominations we may need to experiment. But please don't expect me to spend much time on a given nomination checking on availability. I have a full time job and a book addiction..... ;)
Methinks for a few rounds of nominations we may need to experiment. But please don't expect me to spend much time on a given nomination checking on availability. I have a full time job and a book addiction..... ;)
I think what we said previously is that a book couldn't be a Kindle Unlimited exclusive, because that's U.S. only. I'm not sure I always checked that because I'm not sure I knew what to look for, but I did try to check that it was available on at least two platforms, usually Kindle and paperback.
One problem with Indy's, of course, is the limited number of platforms. An independent author has to manage it all him/herself and has limited resources. And indy's are rarely available in the public library.
One problem with Indy's, of course, is the limited number of platforms. An independent author has to manage it all him/herself and has limited resources. And indy's are rarely available in the public library.



I wasn't proposing to create extra work for the moderators! It's more that it would be useful if whoever nominates an indie title can also say how widely available it is.
On the library point, I'm not sure Kindle-only titles would be available. Ebooks distributed via Smashwords probably would be.
My own local library lends books but only using an app that doesn't handle mobi files. Not sure whether interlibrary loan works with ebooks with the system my local library has. Paperbacks and hardbacks on interlibrary loan took weeks back when I still read dead tree books. I live in a town of under 6k people. No bookstore unless I drive an hour.
In any case, yes it would be nice if either the nominator or some other group member would mention possible availability issues. Odds are good most people only care about the one platform they use themselves.
I will make a point of checking the READER nominations, and we will just hope for the best on other categories.
In any case, yes it would be nice if either the nominator or some other group member would mention possible availability issues. Odds are good most people only care about the one platform they use themselves.
I will make a point of checking the READER nominations, and we will just hope for the best on other categories.


It appears that the THEMED category is a success, with care taken to choose good themes anyway. I myself find it easier to think of books to nominate when they need to fit a theme.
The rule about only nominations that get a second is harder to judge for whether it results in more comments in the discussion thread. It does make it easier for me to do the randomization.
The rule about only nominations that get a second is harder to judge for whether it results in more comments in the discussion thread. It does make it easier for me to do the randomization.
Books mentioned in this topic
Poor Man's Fight (other topics)Poor Man's Fight (other topics)
Goals include
* lots of good nominations so people who read a lot or are picky get more ideas
* chosen books should be ones people will discuss
* don't just choose best sellers
* don't cause too much work for the moderators ;)
So I'm going to propose a variation on our usual process, for the January set of books. If there aren't any strong objections, we will try it for a month or two and then talk about further changes or reverting back to standard.
PROPOSAL
1. Separate nomination thread for each category. I'm hoping this will be less confusing when I tally the nominations for each category.
2. You are allowed to second multiple nominations in the same category if you promise that if we choose one of the books you will post a comment on the book's discussion thread. No penalty if you don't unless it becomes obvious. If you only second one and don't nominate, you aren't promising to post.
3. You can only nominate one book per category. We assume that you will post a comment on the discussion thread if that book is chosen, but no penalty if you don't.
4. When choosing books at random, a book that was nominated but not seconded will be dropped. The remaining books get one point per second, so that a book with lots of seconds will have a greater chance but doesn't prevent a book with a single second from being chosen.
5. We will keep our usual categories, but will add a fourth one, which may vary each month. I'm thinking of categories such as
* Golden Oldie: currently out of print in paper but available as ebook
* Series Starter: good entry point book of a series
* Culture Clash: humans vs aliens or humans of another planet, without a war happening. Misunderstandings due to differences in culture and biology.
So.... does this sound interesting? Want to help me polish it?