Fantasy Buddy Reads discussion

223 views
Archive [General] > Team Reading Competition Rules

Comments Showing 251-300 of 601 (601 new)    post a comment »

message 251: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Petrik wrote: "Guys, I really think you guys shouldn't put the page number on the scoresheet till you're truly done with the book. The score is a mess! It's not even accurate right now because almost everything i..."

Agreed. This was how the sheet was to be completed. I posted it in the notes section on the scoring page of the sheet. Please remove page totals until you have actually completed the book.


message 252: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments I could also figure out a way to toggle more "if" functions witha another column for "complete". So that the pages only tallied if there was a "Y" next to it. (I'd prefer not to have to spend time doing that though.)


message 253: by Petrik (new)

Petrik (petrikleo) | 1546 comments Thank you, Rob and Saar, glad you agreed with me.

I don't usually bother with this kind of thing but my OCD is in pain looking at the scoresheet that's not accurate xD

Also Saar, you can read any kind of books, it doesn't have to be fantasy or sci-fi


message 254: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Saar wrote: "A little question: does it need to be SF or Fantasy or are other genres allowed? Besides SF/F I also read other things..."

Any genre is allowed. The only downside is that some might not get you challenge bonus points. Other than that minor issue, anything is game.


message 255: by Petrik (new)

Petrik (petrikleo) | 1546 comments Rob wrote: "I could also figure out a way to toggle more "if" functions witha another column for "complete". So that the pages only tallied if there was a "Y" next to it. (I'd prefer not to have to spend time ..."

Don't. You have done enough man! Seriously, I'll buy you a drink if we're in the same city!


message 256: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Petrik wrote: "Guys, I really think you guys shouldn't put the page number on the scoresheet till you're truly done with the book. The score is a mess! It's not even accurate right now because almost everything i..."

Agreed. I'm going to try and organize our scorecard so that at least we know how we're doing lol. I'll see about managing our team's spreadsheet better too as soon as I have a moment.


message 257: by Rob (last edited Jan 04, 2018 11:14AM) (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Petrik wrote: "Rob wrote: "I could also figure out a way to toggle more "if" functions witha another column for "complete". So that the pages only tallied if there was a "Y" next to it. (I'd prefer not to have to..."

Fantasy Buddy Reads New York Metro area meetup then :) Though that'd be a loooong flight for you.


message 258: by Anni (last edited Jan 04, 2018 01:01PM) (new)

Anni | 5066 comments I don't know if it's worth the effort, but if you really want to add a function to only add read books we could add two columns, the first for a read date, it stays blank until you truly read it, then a column behind the 'Total book points' for 'true total book points' (ok... we should find a better name :D). When you fill in =if(B4=' ',0,J4) the last column should show the total only if you add a reading date. If the date is blank the score is zero (B must be the date column and J the total book score). And of course, the total score must be calculated with the last column then... I hope this make any sense I'm not good at explaining stuff...


Diana Stormblessed (dashichka) | 5357 comments Rob wrote: "Petrik wrote: "Rob wrote: "I could also figure out a way to toggle more "if" functions witha another column for "complete". So that the pages only tallied if there was a "Y" next to it. (I'd prefer..."

I'll go to that :-)


message 260: by Rob (last edited Jan 04, 2018 03:21PM) (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Anni wrote: "I don't know if it's worth the effort, but if you really want to add a function to only add read books we could add two columns, the first for a read date, it stays blank until you truly read it, t..."

Anni - why don't you try tweaking your sheet with a proposed formula and showing it to me.


message 261: by Anni (last edited Jan 04, 2018 02:42PM) (new)

Anni | 5066 comments Rob wrote: "Anni wrote: "I don't know if it's worth the effort, but if you really want to add a function to only add read books we could add two columns, the first for a read date, it stays blank until you tru..."

I made a copy of my sheet because I don't want to mess things up, maybe you could take a look? :) It's named Copy of Anni.
It only counts the words for book 1 because this one has a date.


message 262: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Anni wrote: "Rob wrote: "Anni wrote: "I don't know if it's worth the effort, but if you really want to add a function to only add read books we could add two columns, the first for a read date, it stays blank u..."

got it, thanks. gives me an idea :)


message 263: by Anni (new)

Anni | 5066 comments Saw your changes, this is even better and exactly what I thought of first. But it didn't work out as I tried... Maybe I messed up the brackets on my phone :D

I think it's me who should thank you, the sheet is amazing and makes things so much easier! ;)


message 264: by Rob (new)

Rob (nefariasbredd) | 2418 comments Anni wrote: "Saw your changes, this is even better and exactly what I thought of first. But it didn't work out as I tried... Maybe I messed up the brackets on my phone :D

I think it's me who should thank you, ..."


you're welcome.I should have done what you suggested right from the start though. I'll implement it for everyone later this evening.


message 265: by Jenna, I'd be free if not for Temper & Edgewalker (new)

Jenna Kathleen (jennakathleen) | 5178 comments Mod
Petrik wrote: "Guys, I really think you guys shouldn't put the page number on the scoresheet till you're truly done with the book. The score is a mess! It's not even accurate right now because almost everything i..."

Yes, you should only input books you have read.


message 266: by Jenna, I'd be free if not for Temper & Edgewalker (new)

Jenna Kathleen (jennakathleen) | 5178 comments Mod
Rob, could you add that to the rules on the spreadsheet?


message 267: by Jenna, I'd be free if not for Temper & Edgewalker (new)

Jenna Kathleen (jennakathleen) | 5178 comments Mod
You already did, never mind and thank you!


message 268: by Liam (new)

Liam (leeman729) | 828 comments Here's a question, that maybe the mods might want to discuss?

This won't apply for a good long while, but will there be bonus points for completing a challenge (if started at the beginning of 2018)?


message 269: by Jenna, I'd be free if not for Temper & Edgewalker (new)

Jenna Kathleen (jennakathleen) | 5178 comments Mod
Liam wrote: "Here's a question, that maybe the mods might want to discuss?

This won't apply for a good long while, but will there be bonus points for completing a challenge (if started at the beginning of 2018)?"


We are already in discussion about bonus points, but we won't be announcing anything until we've worked out all the kinks of the basic setup. :) Great suggestion though!


message 270: by Liam (new)

Liam (leeman729) | 828 comments Gotcha, yeah I'm not trying to add anything more on top of what's currently being figured out haha. That just popped into my head as I've been seeing all the challenges updates, so I figured I'd ask =].

Thanks Jenna!


message 271: by Hacen (last edited Jan 08, 2018 01:32AM) (new)

Hacen | 883 comments Sorry to be a buzzkill but what's gonna happen if people signed up aren't participating?


message 272: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
There is a stipulation in the rules about participation, but it functions on a more long-term basis I think... so next time there are signups added, those teams would get replacements... but I don't know how helpful that would be if a team has ended up really far behind... or if there aren't replacements to give...

On the other hand, I wouldn't be too concerned just yet... some people are still wrapping up 2017 books that don't count... and others just don't have time to read as much as others... so they're just participating at their own rate... that's why Niki and the mods tried to balance the teams on books read... considering how close some of the team scores have been, I think it's been a success thus far...


message 273: by Hacen (new)

Hacen | 883 comments Iain wrote: "There is a stipulation in the rules about participation, but it functions on a more long-term basis I think... so next time there are signups added, those teams would get replacements... but I don'..."

That's true about the scores being somewhat close. I was just worried because of the same things you mentioned about replacements and the team getting too far behind.

Hopefully everyone participates and it doesn't become an issue.


message 274: by Anni (new)

Anni | 5066 comments What about book with an audiobook as most popular edition on goodreads? Captain's Fury for example only got 20 pages... This would be pretty unsatisfying...


message 275: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
Find the 2nd most popular edition... the reason that happens is the book is probably 20hrs long... the Kindle edition with 476 pages has 2328 ratings

Not sure we need to have the librarians change anything this time... there is a reason after all... if anything, goodreads could use a new field in their book data, so a book can have a page count and an hours count...


message 276: by Anni (last edited Jan 12, 2018 05:19AM) (new)

Anni | 5066 comments I know that the 20 pages indicate the hours of the audiobook, I just want to know if it is according to the rules to use the pagecount for the second popular edition ;)

I'm a goodreads librarian myself, but I won't want to change the pagecount because it's widly used this way with one page per hour...


message 277: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
I would definitely call that an exception to the rule. Like Iain said, go ahead and count the second most popular edition.


message 278: by Anni (new)

Anni | 5066 comments Thank you both :)


message 279: by RuinEleint (new)

RuinEleint A small clarification - does "All genres" mean non-fiction? Like say history or biography?


message 280: by Saar The Book owl (last edited Jan 12, 2018 10:45AM) (new)

Saar The Book owl | 3096 comments @Arkadeb: Yes, that includes it too.


message 281: by RuinEleint (new)

RuinEleint Saar wrote: "@Arkadeb: Yes, that includes it too."

Excellent! Thanks :)


message 282: by Barry (new)

Barry (boprawira) | 1212 comments Sorry if it’s been asked before ... does a buddy read count if I take more than 1 month to complete the book?


message 283: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
I don't think there's any rule dictating how long a book has to be read in... there are still people just finishing Oathbringer from November... understandable when it's the size of 4 books... (and doesn't count for the competition, having been started in 2017)


message 284: by Jenna, I'd be free if not for Temper & Edgewalker (new)

Jenna Kathleen (jennakathleen) | 5178 comments Mod
Iain wrote: "I don't think there's any rule dictating how long a book has to be read in... there are still people just finishing Oathbringer from November... understandable when it's the size of..."

Iain is correct - we understand that some people are speed readers and some like to take their time. As long as you started around the time as the group, you can count it towards your challenge if that's why you're asking. Also, as Iain mentioned, it has to be started in 2018 to count toward the challenge.


message 285: by Barry (new)

Barry (boprawira) | 1212 comments Thanks for the answer Iain and Jenna.


message 286: by Chris (new)

Chris  Haught (haughtc) | 2348 comments ...and those forced to take their time by insane school/work/life distractions...


message 287: by RuinEleint (new)

RuinEleint Chris wrote: "...and those forced to take their time by insane school/work/life distractions..."

That would be me. Work is insane right now.


message 288: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (last edited Jan 19, 2018 11:42AM) (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
Me and Choko were talking about adding another "Pop-Up Buddy Read" over in the Kushiel's Chosen thread, so we could read/re-read Kushiel's Dart and be ready to join Bill & Laura on February 1st...

We were wary, since it almost feels unfair the way me and Choko can schedule a Buddy Read like this and finish it within a day or 2...

Niki had this to say on the subject:

I'd ask in the main rules for the challenge if the other mods think that's okay. I'm of the mindset that if you're both changing schedules to read a book at the same time and are making an effort to discuss it (in an official thread here) then it should count. Not that either of you need help with points. ;P

Given we did this once before already with Heart on Fire @ https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/... and Margret said there was little reason to add it to the Master List, I also floated an idea of just giving us a folder and we can make the threads ourselves in the future, if we keep doing this, and it's okay...


message 289: by Silvana (new)

Silvana (silvaubrey) | 1970 comments I don't think I see any question related to short stories or anything under 7,500 words. Do they count as well for this team challenge?


message 290: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
I think they do... they just aren't worth many points... most have page counts listed...

You'd have to read a lot of short stories under 10-30 pages to start gaining any sort of edge on the fact that the minimum challenge bonus is 0.1


message 291: by Silvana (new)

Silvana (silvaubrey) | 1970 comments I see. So a minimum of 10 pages... Which is around 5000 words. Okay, will see at the end of the year if I still need to include them for points :D


message 292: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
I'm not the arbiter of rules, but mathematically, any story under 5 pages will round down to 0 before bonus points can be calculated, so the true minimum is 2500 words, I guess...


message 293: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Iain, I'll copy and paste your question to the mod group on Monday. It's easy to miss in the feed and I know peeps are busy this weekend.

And short story points. Isn't the spreadsheet set up to round everything up even if it falls under .5? I know a lot of things have been tweaked since as started, but I remember all things adding up as a point of emphasis.


message 294: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
Thanks, Niki... this group has been flying, in general, since the competition started on New Years...

I ran a page count total on the spreadsheet this morning, and we've recorded 112,345 pages to the spreadsheet across all 41 active readers...

Luckily, we're not planning to read the book until next weekend, regardless...

On the topic of pages, the spreadsheet rounds down pages and rounds up bonus points... and does the bonus point calculations before rounding anything (unlike the initial rules, but it doesn't matter since everybody uses the spreadsheet)

So... a 4 page book is worth 0 points, but is worth .1 points in Buddy Read points and Challenge points... the Incomplete Series challenge or the Overflowing Bookshelf challenge are probably the only challenges where that wouldn't be a waste...


message 295: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
Oh okay. Per my understanding, everything should round up, but it might be too late to do anything about that. Your right, as long as we're all consistent, that's probably all that matters.

That's good that we have a week. :)


message 296: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (last edited Jan 20, 2018 09:07AM) (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
You wrote the rules, but:

How Does the Scoring System Work?

Scoring will be based on pages. Since page counts vary among formats, we will accept the highest (rated) page count listed on Goodreads for whatever book you're reading (this is also how you will determine a value for audiobooks).

You will earn .1 points for every 10 pages read, rounded to the nearest tenth (pages/.01). For example:

354 pages = 3.5 book points
866 pages = 8.7 book points



message 297: by Timelord Iain, Tech Support (new)

Timelord Iain | 35277 comments Mod
I added the word rated after I noticed the rules are a bit out of date...


message 298: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
I think it should say rounded up to the nearest tenth. I'll have to dig through the mod threads and double check where we talked about all of that. Looks like I'll need to update anyway.


message 299: by Miche (last edited Jan 20, 2018 01:06PM) (new)

Miche | 3279 comments Suggestion for the future: we should probably increase the number of comments necessary for sign ups.

There are plenty of other challenges that are open for all, independent if the person comes here once a week/month or year.

This one requires participation and when people disappear without notice it might damage the chance for a team to even catch up at the future, due to the balancing distribution done when assigning people to teams.

The minimum comments necessary should be much higher, i.e. 500. This would ensure that people is often here, interacting with others.

If new people wants to participate, they would just need to interacting with the group. 25 comments is easily attained in one day.


message 300: by Niki Hawkes, I made it past GOTM... barely (new)

Niki Hawkes - The Obsessive Bookseller | 7639 comments Mod
I'll definitely bring up that suggestion, thanks Miche! Most of our current no-shows signed up before I had any comment criteria in place (big whoops), but luckily I think it sparked enthusiasm in a few to get more involved. I personally don't think it would hurt bumping up the requirement a little to make sure those who sign up now are ready to be engaged (because we're a long-term commitment, lol).


back to top