Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion

This topic is about
The New Mrs D
Women's Fiction
>
For Days When You Feel Like Giving Up
date
newest »



Thank you - this is so true. You just have to keep going if you know that all there is inside of you is this unsinkable desire to write. XXX

But I'm finding that I (shock of shocks!) have to promote the darned book. And I really have little desire to be a promoter.
This puts me at a decided disadvantage to people who just love to write five or six hours a day, then promote five or six hours a day. Then read five or six hours a day. And then drive all over attending writers' clubs, dropping off business cards and book marks...

After listening to many authors from both sides of the publishing spectrum, indie and traditional, talk about their experiences, even some who are with a Major, I can see no advantages for a new author to look for a publisher!
Even the writers who were best sellers with a Major and like being there floundered when queried as to how the publisher has helped their books reach the market. They had to do it all themselves and bear all the expense. They did get some advice, but even that was sometimes charged as a draw against book sales. Any bookings the publishers set up the writer bore the expenses. Any advances they got went straight to their personal marketing work.
Now there are writers like Holly Lisle who have been there, done that, been successful and are happy to share what they've learned for free or at reasonable costs.
The writers lost final say over their final product. A couple have convinced their publishers to release them from contracts and will now publish indie.
It's a new world. When publishers stopped treating writers like the precious talent that keeps publishers in business and started treating them like a commodity . . . well, their loss.
It's a time of flux for writers.
But isn't it always?

But I'm finding that I (shock of shocks!) have to promote the darned book. And I really have little desire to be a promoter.
..."
Sigh. So true.

But I'm finding that I (shock of shocks!) have to promote the darned book. And I really have little desire to be a promoter.
..."
I went to school for marketing, but this book promoting is really something. Believe me, I feel your pain!

But I'm finding that I (shock of shocks!) have to promote the darned book. And I really have little desire to be a promoter.
..."
Hi Dennis, I have read a lot of stories about authors having 70 or more rejections and I don't know if I could have waited that long to be honest. I think marketing is awful; I'm really not good at selling. I'm a writer. But then, I want to have people read what I'm writing so I guess it is all par for the course. I love what I do and I just can't stop trying to get there. I have no desire for fame or fortune, I just want to reach people with my work. If it sounds sap to some, well, so be it. This is my truth :) I'm just going to keep going the best way I can.


“An irresponsible holiday story that will never sell.” Rejection of The Wind In The Willows by Kenneth Grahame. The novel sold 25 million copies worldwide.
Perhaps we have to be dead before we become popular :- o)

Can't say I agree with you. How an author decides to publish is an individual choice. Each has there pitfalls and each requires commitment by the writer.
To completely discount tradition publishers seems unfair to those publishers. They must have done some things write to have their current stable of successful writers. There are many writers who would be quite happy to have their books published traditionally.
If a writer wants complete control of his work and the marketing required to sell it - then self-publish. If they are unable to handle rejection then they should definitely stay away from traditional methods. They will have complete control and be fully responsible for their own success with self-publishing.
Given the wide variety of people writing today - I think there is definitely room for both types of publishing. My preference as a reader tends toward the professional quality of traditional publishing.


You're going to have to do all the marketing yourself if you're traditionally published, so that's moot.
" . . .If they are unable to handle rejection then they should definitely stay away from traditional methods. They will have complete control and be fully responsible for their own success with self-publishing."
"Unable to handle rejection" comes across as condescending and I'm sure you didn't intend that. What if I turned that around and remarked that using a publisher was best for people who didn't want to take responsibility for their own work? Unfair generalization, right?
For me, it IS about creative control. The integrity of the story, in its entirety, is everything for me. I've seen too many struggle with their publishers and wind up compromised, having to either accept ludicrous covers, absurd pricing and, to add insult to injury, not even be able to get books delivered to them from the publisher for the writer's own, self-generated and financed publicity events. Not to mention the typos and mistakes that weren't there in the original manuscripts. It has also taken far too long to get the finished product (after professional editing paid for by the author before sending it to the publisher) on the shelves, virtual or physical.
Publishing is changing, and right now the key seems to be Author Beware. The day may not be too far off when what we can count on the major houses for is keeping the shelves stocked with Twilights, Various Shades of Something and My Name is So Big I Have a Stable of Writers to Do the Actual Writing For Me books — no risk involved. You can't fault them for that; they are, after all, corporate entities existing for the sole purpose of generating large incomes.
Check around and look at the established authors flirting with — and some committing to self-publishing. They aren't being loud about it, with the possible exception of Stephen King, but they're out there.






I've checked them out and they look fun! Did you know that they're currently unavailable in the Amazon.co.uk kindlestore? I was interested that your reviews highlight the teaching points and the good messages. That links us, though obviously my books are for older children...

That said, I think self publishing is better than small press publishing. If you know someone and can get a meeting at a large publisher or agent of course go for it. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time anymore.


She says the more books you have available, the more chance you have to build a following and start selling your books. I totally agree.
Promotion is necessary, of course, but writing is just as important if not more so. I'm promoting little by little, but not letting it get in the way of working on my next book.
What's more, I'm find that the more I write, the more ideas I have for new things. I like that!

As for marketing, I'm horrific at it (flunked twice). I can't sell snow to an inuit. >_< I just keep hammering out books...


Lol omg, I really hope not!:))) but you are so right, I just keep sending query letters to publishers and agents, some of them politely say that my book is not what they are currently looking for, some just don't reply, so it's very easy to lose hope. But thank God I have very supportive friends that keep telling me to keep trying and keep marketing my book because they really enjoyed it. So every morning when I wake up I remind myself that it doesn't matter if I fall seven times, I'll get up eight:)))
Let's make our books bestsellers just to prove those publishers wrong!;)

That's the spirit, Ellie!


But I'm finding that I (shock of shocks!) have to promote the darned book. And I really have little desire to be a promoter.
..."
LOL. Yes it does, Dennis. Who are those people?! What great energy they have! For the rest of us we must be happy doing what we do... best wishes to your success!

Congratulations Heather!! While my self-published books have found only modest success thus far, it is the act of creating, publishing, reading a review, knowing I completed my project that keeps me loving this process... Keep going!

Be it a rejection from a publisher or a bad review if you self pub, don't see them as a barrier to your success. They are learning tools!


Be it a rejection from a publisher or a bad review if you self pub, don't see them as a barrier to your success. They are learning tools! ..."
It pays to consider the source, too, especially of a bad review. When I see a snarky review of someone's work that is, itself, poorly written, without grace or wit or often even basic wordcrafting skills I chalk it up to someone with an chronic ego problem.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/bestseller...