There’s a fan-edit that completely removes the Sandman from the film – even from the final showdown scene. Considering Sandman’s story only runs side-by-side with Peter’s and its only pay off is the unnecessary “who killed Uncle Ben” retread, I was delighted to see it go. I dig the actor and portrayal of Sandman, but it just didn’t need to be there. Emo Peter is bad, but not worse than go-nowhere storytelling.
Spider-man 3 is an okay watch, not the worst movie ever. but the “No Sandman Edition” fan edit is my ideal version. I just need to track it down again. Despite taking over $890 million worldwide, the large-budget and extensive promotion also meant the profits were down on previous entries and the film took an extensive battering from the critics at the time; reviewers and fans alike pointed to the crowded and unfocused plot as being far less engaging than Spider-Man 2, still regarded as being the best Spider-Man film so far” Could someone please translate this into English?
There was a fan edit that removed the venom parts of the film that I enjoyed. I’m sure it was a lot shorter and there were some holes because obivously there are moments that Venom had to be there but still I enjoyed that. Yeah and it’s a bummer because so many things could have been good in this movie. Like you said, sandman was good, but he was unnecessary in this movie. With a plot and themes that made sense with the sandman arch and gave it time to develop they could have had a very compelling movie. They just needed to pick a thing and develop it, and sandman wasn’t given the opportunity to do that.
The wait is over in few days you can see one of the best movie this year the Transformers: The Last Knight
Spider-man 3 is an okay watch, not the worst movie ever. but the “No Sandman Edition” fan edit is my ideal version. I just need to track it down again. Despite taking over $890 million worldwide, the large-budget and extensive promotion also meant the profits were down on previous entries and the film took an extensive battering from the critics at the time; reviewers and fans alike pointed to the crowded and unfocused plot as being far less engaging than Spider-Man 2, still regarded as being the best Spider-Man film so far” Could someone please translate this into English?
There was a fan edit that removed the venom parts of the film that I enjoyed. I’m sure it was a lot shorter and there were some holes because obivously there are moments that Venom had to be there but still I enjoyed that.
Yeah and it’s a bummer because so many things could have been good in this movie. Like you said, sandman was good, but he was unnecessary in this movie. With a plot and themes that made sense with the sandman arch and gave it time to develop they could have had a very compelling movie. They just needed to pick a thing and develop it, and sandman wasn’t given the opportunity to do that.
The wait is over in few days you can see one of the best movie this year the Transformers: The Last Knight
http://www.oldsouthvideo.com/watch-tr...