Stephen King Fans discussion
The Stand Buddy Read
>
The Stand Part One: June 1 - June 30

(Sorry, don't know how to reply properly; probably because I'm on my phone not the computer).
I have also finished book one and read on, because I can't hold back when I'm reading King's writing. 😜

I also noticed that he used the description full dark several times so I started to highlight it. This caught my attention because he named a collection of stories "Full Dark, No Stars" which I think is a wonderful title for the collection that he put together. In book 1 I highlighted this phrase "full dark" 3 times and he has used it twice so far in book two.
Another cool nod to himself occurs when Frannie says, "Flu made who" which is a play on who made who by ACDC and therefore Maximum Overdrive.



I read that Tabby scoured the house and his office and gathered an entire Hefty bag of empty bottles (alcohol and coke) and dropped them at his feet before the planned family intervention! A FULL Hefty bag. It boggles the mind.

It's from Jungleland, right at the beginning. I'm still on the Book 1 but I keep thinking that later on, as people are (presumably since I haven't actually read that part yet) traveling the countryside, someone could come upon a scene like this.

(Sorry, don't know how to reply properly; proba..."
I made note of the use of "full dark" too! Most people say "complete" or "total" and say "darkness" and not just "dark." Other than his story collection, I don't remember noticing that expression in his other writing but I don't know that I was looking too closely. Has anyone noticed this in other King books?




Me too, Angel. I like her a lot so far. (view spoiler)

yes it will all come clear in the end actually quite a bit sooner then that. Because of the size of the book it allows him more room to flesh out his characters, giving them greater depth.

On a different note, I really like Frannie's dad. [spoilers removed]"
Summer I agree with you on your assessment of this happening in the present. (view spoiler) .
You are right about Frannies Dad.

The problem is when this was written that was the norm. It would never fly if it was written in the present.

I agree. I'm 66, King's age roughly and that is how I'm reading the book for the 4th time. If he was to write it again today there would be stronger women characters.

OK I know that sounds sexist, but at the time it wasn't. Trust me I know the fallacy of the statement I know how strong women are and am not afraid to say they are more often then not stronger emotionally and in some cases physically then men.
I do not think that way, but that is how we were taught.



I think my opinion of Frannie is colored by her interactions with Harold. (view spoiler)
On a different note, I just made it to Nick's introduction and I'm excited. He's one of my favorite characters (view spoiler)

(view spoiler)

[spoilers removed]"
Not as I remember, but I will let you know when I reach that part of the book.

Frannie can be a bit that way (view spoiler)
Yes I feel the same way about our friend Nick one of my favorite characters in the book.





So true! We are often confined by our circumstances despite being told we can be/do anything we want. It's not always true and these women were strong.


I think it's crazy how King is so good at "getting in the head" of someone not like him. I mean he writes terrific female character POVs, a deaf/mute, and dogs to name a few. He is none of those things and yet it feels very, very genuine.






Maybe the critics mean that women don't control or have a powerful effect on the story the way they do in some of King's other books or say, Swan Song.


Larry is one of my favorites as well. (view spoiler)




There's a difference, though, between characters like Alice and Vic in NOS4A2. The authors are writing at different points in time with different understanding about feminism, mental health, technology, economics, etc. and that's apparent in how their female characters are portrayed.
(view spoiler)[I thought the moment between Frannie and her father really showed the love between them. Her mother was awful to her.
I also thought it was interesting that Frannie was hinting that if her mother died that it would be at least partly her fault. Then she started thinking that responsibility was like pie and she would have to eat her piece. This reminds me of "Thinner". I also thought that King would expound upon her guilt or at least dismiss it but so far he hasn't revisited Frannie's guilt at all.
Responsibility is again discussed in Atlanta when Stu finally gets some answers. The exact quote from Deitz is "On this one the responsibility spreads in so many directions that it's invisible. It was an accident. It could have happened in any number of ways."
We have Frannie on one hand feeling the responsibility for something that is in no way her fault and then you have Deitz who I feel is at least a little responsible but is trying to explain it away as an accident.
(hide spoiler)]