♔ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ・Aɴ Aᴅᴠᴀɴᴄᴇᴅ Rᴏʟᴇᴘʟᴀʏ ♔ discussion

33 views
Wᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ > Questions/Comments/Suggestions

Comments Showing 1-50 of 58 (58 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1

message 1: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
Let us know what you're confused about or thinking here.


message 2: by Savannah W ~ (last edited May 03, 2017 04:34PM) (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white)
Hey! So i think, key word being think, when a sibling becomes the new king or queen, the other siblings are no longer priencesses and princes; they become dukes and dutchesses, or sometimes lords and ladies. The title of princess and prince go to the childern of the current throne holder. I Think lol.



message 3: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
Ah yes. I figured someone smart would ask this lol. Yes, this is technically true but for the sake of this role play, I made it so they remain princes/esses until they are married, then they receive the official title of Duke/Duchess


message 4: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white)
I hear ya :). So long as it's an intentional thing, totally understand having it set up that. It probably will work better like that for an rp, in ways.



message 5: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
Yeah. I figured if there were like sixty dukes and duchesses in one place it'd get much more confusing than sixty princes/esses.


message 6: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white)
One last question. I'm sure it says it somewhere, but my dumb self didn't notice from what I've skimmed. This is...modern day? Medieval? Victorian?



message 7: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
No worries, haha, it's kind of just implied. It's medieval.


message 8: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white) Heard! Last one, is it the traditional sort where women were not usually allowed to be fighters and what not, so its a bit of a struggle for any girl to do that? Or is it way more open?


message 9: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
It's very traditional. The whole women restrictions is actually a big thing in the roleplay, especially when it comes to women being heirs.


message 10: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white) Mkay! Thank you for answering my questions. More may come.


message 11: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
Of course, keep asking them! It gives me something to do XD


message 12: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white)
If you insist XD. Imma shut you a message, though. It's about a character, so far more specific questions I don't want to litter you question box with lol.



message 13: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
Hah, alright go for it.


message 14: by Antonia (new)

Antonia (adf7793) | 16 comments Would it be possible to make a captain of the royal guard character? Basically it would be his job to train incoming royal guards and ensure they are willing/able to do their duty without fail?


message 15: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
That would be totally fine, I make the claim for you!


message 16: by Antonia (new)

Antonia (adf7793) | 16 comments Okay, thank you so much!


message 17: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
Sure thing!


message 18: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white) Are we able to make a lord who's not related to the royal family? I didn't see a specific claims area for that sorta thing. He'd be part of the French domain.


message 19: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
I was going to add some French nobles in later, once the group grew more.


message 20: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white) So...we aren't able to make a nobleman unless he's one of the Duke's children with regards to France at the time being...?


message 21: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
I'd say technically it's fine for you to go ahead and make one now, but you just won't have an official claim and may have to change some things once the official claims do go up. If that's okay with you, then go for it!


message 22: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
I really trust you guys to make your own template since it is advanced and I know most of you already :)

But a little guidance would be history, personality, appearance, face claim, status, and relationships.


message 23: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
No problem love.


message 24: by Antonia (new)

Antonia (adf7793) | 16 comments I was wondering if y'all had an idea of when you might add more visiting countries? i only ask because i prefer to play characters that are 18 or older, and it sees like all those positions might be claimed at this time?


message 25: by blue (new)

blue (hermiionegranger) Antonia wrote: "I was wondering if y'all had an idea of when you might add more visiting countries? i only ask because i prefer to play characters that are 18 or older, and it sees like all those positions might b..."

^ i was thinking this too


message 26: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (last edited May 09, 2017 02:30PM) (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
I dont think all the remaining claims are below 18, at least not from the visiting countries

I can look over the collab lists and double check but im sure if you talk with the other family people claimed then you can do older


message 27: by blue (new)

blue (hermiionegranger) well i dont wanna do older characters
but i just like want a character to do
but most of them are taken
and the ones left, i dont really wanna be them
im sorry if that sounded rude


message 28: by kaya (new)

kaya (ananats) England, Russia, China, Egypt and India all still have open claims.


message 29: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
How old is older exactly? Old as in you don't want the Widower king of Ireland or the Dowager queen both of which are over 30?


- The Egyptian concubines can be male or female 18+ and don't necessarily have to be banging the pharaoh he just likes to help people out sometimes, including from outside the country so they don't have to be egyptian either
- Any of the non royal claims can be any age
- There's an open English prince that doesn't have to be super young
- there's a russian prince who can definitely be older than 16 cause my kid is the youngest at 16
- looks like there's an indian princess and I'm sure you can ask to make her over 18
- China has a prince and princess that can prolly be over 18
- Nigeria has a prince as well who can prolly be older.


message 30: by blue (new)

blue (hermiionegranger) kaya wrote: "England, Russia, China, Egypt and India all still have open claims."

i know


message 31: by blue (new)

blue (hermiionegranger) never mind then,.


message 32: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
The plan for the group is that when all the foreign royalty claims are completely filled, then we'll add more countries. That gives time for all the details of each family to be figured out so that, when we move onto new countries, we dont have to worry about people having to sift through a ton of old threads if they joined after and there's a claim left on country first listed when the group was first made.
Does that make sense?


message 33: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white) I think it may be that people may feel a bit confined by what they can do with their characters and may not want to make a character in that family because of it. It's like telling a creative "you can make your character anything you want...but you have to keep in mind that sibling A had this happen, sibling C had this happen, and and Sibling B caused this to happen. Oh! And their parents were always super sweet and perfect to them. Yeah, so no broken childhoods for your character...hm...but yeah, other than that, free roaming. Oh, no, JK, don't forget that they can't--" You see what I'm saying? People may not want to make character that they don't feel like is actually there's in the end.

But that's just my two sense XD. I get why ya'll don't wanna make more with claims still open. But...what if we cut away the claims that haven't been taken and trade them for a new country or two with smaller families? Just a suggestion!


message 34: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
That is an interesting suggestion ^-^ I'll pitch it to Rose


but to be fair, if a person doesn't want to work with others in a family collab, they're probably not suited to doing a royal family collab lol cause that requires everyone being on the same page XD


message 35: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white) Not quite true in my opinion. I dont think that because someone cant make a character feel 'right' to them because of restrictions od a family collab doesnt mean they would be unfit to do a royal fam collab. It just means that family collab isnt for them. It's like in real life; each family is different, and not every person can fit into them. But! My opinion XD. Im happy that youre gonna run what i suggested by Rose! Itd allow for the current families to set everything in stone while allowing new joining members a chance to get into a family that hasnt had so much done for it already, thus making others feel confined and uneasy when it comes to joining the fam.


message 36: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
I'll agree to disagree lol

but yeah its not a bad idea imo, its up to Rose if she wants to wait a little longer or not. I think some of the families haven't really been started, or at least not talked about in the collab threads made but that doesn't mean nothing's been talked about lol


message 37: by Savannah W ~ (new)

Savannah W ~ (savannah_white) To each his own XD.

Heard! Look forward to hearing back from you all :). Thank you for your replies :).


message 38: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
^-^ I'm happy to help~


message 39: by Antonia (last edited May 09, 2017 03:16PM) (new)

Antonia (adf7793) | 16 comments @kiks; Preferably a male older than 21 but definitely younger than 30, I guess it doesn't necessarily have to be a royal male but since the only two claims I have at the moment are non-royals it'd be nice? lol.

Thank you for your suggestions, I'll look into them. :)


message 40: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
If you want someone to hash out details with you, you could do an egyptian concubine ^-^ I've got the 19yo pharaoh so I can help you out in that regard since I know all the deets for the country :D


message 41: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
Thanks to Kiks for updating me.

I like the idea of removing claims some claims to open up more. To accommodate everyone, I will be removing the unclaimed characters in the visiting claims and adding more.

I cannot promise this will be done soon however. It is finals week for me so I may not be able to add all the new claims until this weekend.


message 42: by kaya (new)

kaya (ananats)
y'all are going to hate me for this but australia doesn't work.
australia was colonised in 1788 by the british, and only became its own nation in 1901. we still have the same royal family as the british, although we have a governor-general who acts on behalf of the queen when signing things.
also australia's history when it comes to genocide and other such things is very complicated and a sensitive topic for indigenous australians
that aside, if you ignore this request am i allowed to write a list of things to avoid/be sensitive about? bc there's a lot



message 43: by blue (new)

blue (hermiionegranger) kaya wrote: "y'all are going to hate me for this but australia doesn't work.
australia was colonised in 1788 by the british, and only became its own nation in 1901. we still have the same royal family as the br..."


Well, I mean it's claims for now. Not like for history. I mean, I know what you mean, but I mean, it's still a place. An actual country as well. So we can't just leave it out and add the others.


message 44: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
Rose will give you an answer when she comes online. Please do not instigate or anything until the question is answered ^-^ We dont want a fight to break out in our roleplay group


message 45: by blue (new)

blue (hermiionegranger) I know but like, I'm just saying you cant leave it out. but it's fine. the mods decision.


message 46: by blue (new)

blue (hermiionegranger) okay so this just a suggestion. please dont think its like against or you something, it's not. it's just my opinion. so i think we should have australia? i mean a few people (including me) already wanted it and claimed characters plus i think, i mean it is a country too. i realize what you mean by the history but we cant just remove it after we already made it? i'm just saying so the mods take this into consideration as well.


message 47: by Kikki, Part time mod, full time awesome (new)

Kikki (kikki-not-kiki) | 288 comments Mod
Guys please wait to continue until Rose gets on or else I'm going to freeze this thread. This is the second warning.


message 48: by juno., you make me gold (new)

juno. (junosummers) | 66 comments Mod
I second Kikki; please wait until Rose gets on.


message 49: by Rose ♥ (new)

Rose ♥ | 196 comments Mod
First of all, when a moderator tells you to hold off on discussing something for one reason or another, even if it's not me, please listen. This is unnegotiable and I don't want to hear excuses.

Second, this is a fantasy roleplay. All countries that are in the world are available to be claimed when put in the claim topic. It's not meant to offend anybody of any culture, it's just to allow people to use face claims of whoever they'd like. Everything is completely made up, not according to history at all. If this is too much for anyone to handle, and I hate to be this blunt, but you should leave because it won't change.

All good?



message 50: by sucre'd fiend (new)

sucre'd fiend (sucredfiend) | 45 comments Hello, hello!
Just a quick question: would foreign royals be bringing their own servants? I assume they have a choice to do so, but was curious ^-^
and if they do, might I suggest limiting it to guards and maybe an adviser or two, depending on the country maybe?


« previous 1
back to top

218559

♔ Cᴏᴜʀᴛ・Aɴ Aᴅᴠᴀɴᴄᴇᴅ Rᴏʟᴇᴘʟᴀʏ ♔

unread topics | mark unread