Literature 1 discussion

This topic is about
The Great Gatsby
Gatsby Blue Group
>
After reading chapter 7
date
newest »


As regards the focalisation in this chapter, we can see an abrupt change when Gatsby and Daisy are coming back home and they run over Myrtle (Tom's mistress). That's the moment when everything changes and everyone accused Gatsby for the murder. As a result, the only person that remained with him was Nick. I think the purpose of this focalisation is to show us that people wanted Gatsby because he was a wealthy man. That caused me indignation because he was guilty of something that he hadn't done, and even his long-time lover had left him alone. It was a question of interests, and don't like it.

As regards focalisation I´m not sure but in my opinion there is a change from internal focalisation to external focalisation because since chapter 7 Nick didn´t impart any information as to characters´ thoughts or feelings, he assumed a role outside of them and he didn´t add any interpretation or analysis. Only at the end of the novel he expressed what he thought about Daisy and Tom behaviors’.
Good points about the hot weather and the characters' feelings!
María suitably mentions this shift from internal to external focalisation, yet the voice continues to be Nick's although there are details of scenes that he couldn't have witnessed. Is this a case of faulty focalisation or does the text account for this shift? Tip: you will find the info later in the novel.
María suitably mentions this shift from internal to external focalisation, yet the voice continues to be Nick's although there are details of scenes that he couldn't have witnessed. Is this a case of faulty focalisation or does the text account for this shift? Tip: you will find the info later in the novel.


Talking about focalisation, there is a scene in which Nick talks about the eye witness account by Michaelis of the accident. This is obviously not something he witnessed. However, it does give the reader helpful information to follow along the unraveling of the plot.


As regards the shift in focalisation, I believe the text accounts for the scene Nick could not have witnessed in chapter IX page 171, when it says: “When Michaelis’s testimony at the inquest brought to light Wilson’s suspicions of his wife I thought the whole tale would shortly be served up in racy pasquinade...” It is very likely that Nick got to know what had happened because of Michaelis’s testimony.

Heat exacerbates emotions and in this case announces the tragedy that is going to unfold. It is the last summer not necessarily because of Gatsby's death, but because from the start we know that at the end of these events Nick left New York and returned to the Midwest.
The use of a limited narrator can be a constraint for the writer, but here he finds a logical solution to introduce the account of the accident (and the events leading up to it)through Michaelis’s testimony at the inquest, which Nick attended. The version of the events that emerges from it also provides Nick with another opportunity to question the validity of "absolute truth"
The use of a limited narrator can be a constraint for the writer, but here he finds a logical solution to introduce the account of the accident (and the events leading up to it)through Michaelis’s testimony at the inquest, which Nick attended. The version of the events that emerges from it also provides Nick with another opportunity to question the validity of "absolute truth"
Are there any changes in focalisation in this chapter? What is the purpose? What is the effect?