UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion
Past Group Book Discussions
>
Bad Science - Ben Goldacre
date
newest »



https://www.goodreads.com/author/show...

I spent 12 years up to my retirement in 2012 heading a team supplying evidence summaries to the local primary care trusts and training their staff in doing their own systematic reviews. Then the “Alliance” government felt the need to urine-mark the healthcare sector. The survivors of my team are now in local government somewhere and I have no idea who’s funnelling clinical evidence into the CCGs, CFTs, CSSs, LATs and the rest of the alphabetti spaghetti that constitutes the rump NHS that hasn’t been stealth privatised yet. Which I suppose is more of a worry than whether or not you like Goldacre’s style. Anyway, we need people like him.

Feeling a tad smug cos when we went for our MOT, my statins were mega good - cos I eat mostly fish and have been weightwatchering for ever.

Shame it wasn't an ebook. I'd love to re-read it."
It is an ebook - I've got it.

Can't see myself buying it again.
I'm breaking the bank buying books because of that Damn David Staniforth's fave authors thread.

I find he has a tendency to think he's the only one who's right. As Richard says he can be arrogant.

Can't see myself buying it again.
I'm breaking the bank buying books because of that Damn David Staniforth's fave authors thread."
Glad to be of service, madam :~)

I find he has a tendency to think he's the only one who's right. As Richard says he can be arrogant."
Arrogant is fine - cos he is prob right anyway

Speaking as father and father-in-law to nurses, I say of course he's arrogant - he's a doctor! But on his central theme - that decisions about our health ought to be based on evidence rather than smoke and mirrors - he's def right.
Having suggested the book, I've now dutifully finished rereading it. One thing that jumps out at you from the 2nd edition is all the fulsome reviews from the likes of the Telegraph, Times, Mail et al, the very same papers he savagely lambasts for the inaccuracy, nay, mendacity of their science reporting. We appear to have entered the post-ironic zone.

So close, and yet so far.


Id google it, but I'm lazy.


I was expecting tinkling angels."
Curiously, a Google image search on those exact terms doesn't bring any up. But it did yield a picture of Gordon Brown.
Full of spleen, this is a hilarious, invigorating and informative journey through the world of Bad Science. When Dr Ben Goldacre saw someone on daytime TV dipping her feet in an 'Aqua Detox' footbath, releasing her toxins into the water, turning it brown, he thought he'd try the same at home. 'Like some kind of Johnny Ball cum Witchfinder General', using his girlfriend's Barbie doll, he gently passed an electrical current through the warm salt water. It turned brown. In his words: 'before my very eyes, the world's first Detox Barbie was sat, with her feet in a pool of brown sludge, purged of a weekend's immorality.' Dr Ben Goldacre is the author of the Bad Science column in the Guardian. His book is about all the 'bad science' we are constantly bombarded with in the media and in advertising. At a time when science is used to prove everything and nothing, everyone has their own 'bad science' moments from the useless pie-chart on the back of cereal packets to the use of the word 'visibly' in cosmetics ads
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Science-B...