The Evolution of Science Fiction discussion

This topic is about
The Sparrow
Group Reads 2016
>
December group read - The Sparrow
message 1:
by
Jo
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Dec 01, 2016 08:44AM

reply
|
flag





Why mention this? Sofia Mendes, or rather, Mendes' occupation, which is to gather information about other occupations in order to build AIs with which to replace them. Scary, or what?

Did I say scary? Well, it just got even scarier ...

I personally would be scared if the cat started talking to me. Still didn't happen.
The telling in The Sparrow is going back and forward in time. That method is used in quite some books we read here and I don't allways like it. But in The Sparrow I find it very well used tot tell the story.

Asking a judgement question from a search engine is the basic error. It's not what they're designed to do, as the disclaimer quoted in the article makes clear. Use of a tool implies a responsibility to understand the tool. Whether it is a chainsaw or a computer program, using it incorrectly will lead to bad results. Anger tends to be voiced more than approval, so the results are not at all surprising. People like things simple, but it's not a simple world. It never was & is decidedly less so today. I highly recommend reading A Field Guide to Lies: Critical Thinking in the Information Age.
I just finished reading Sparrow and have ordered Children of God. This book was a great read and wonderful characterization. I found the characters fascinating in their approaches to life. I have struggled most of my life with approaching God. It is interesting to watch Carlos in his progress approaching God. I find it difficult to find the peace in my heart that I wish to attain on this subject. But is always worth the effort, at least for me, so far.

I found the concept of intellectual slavery frightening.

The problems I had with it are bound to my own preferences. At first the big role religion has in the story. I'm interested in SF but not a bit in religion. Obvious that's a problem reading The Sparrow. Second is the fact that the author takes a lot of time for describing the characters, relations and interaction between the characters in the book. Characterbuilding of course is very usefull, but in my opinion it's overdone here. Especially when the characters also have a relationship with god which also needs to be described. I see though that for a lot of readers this fact is adding to the quality of the book.
The gruesome and humiliating things that happen at the end of the book seemed to me to have the function to show us that even in the worst circumstances there must be a way not to lose trust in god. I would be disappointed if this religious theme became more obvious in Children of God. If not, I'm looking forward to reading the second part of a great story.

I'm around half way now, just at the point where they are about to make contact. I've really been enjoying it up to now. The only lull has been when they landed on the surface which lost my attention. I assume with contact my interest will resume. I like the blend of characters and the fact they are not all of a religious nature. It makes it more interesting in how the characters approach the unknown.



In the beginning of the book we are introduced, in depth, to five characters. Then one more, not quite as in-depth, then at the last minute, two more. When they are embarking on their journey, it seems like the pace picks up. It's almost rushed, compared to the earlier part of the book. (view spoiler) I guess we'll find out as we read on. It is a long book.
In the first part of the book, we've been teased with allegations of unknown atrocities. I keep wondering if this is really necessary? On the other hand, I feel that it is very well written.

I hope we aren't compelled to read the second novel to finish the story in the first. Connie Willis' double novel Blackout/All Clear annoyed me no-end in that it was really one too-long novel cut into two pieces and given different names. I hope The Sparrow isn't like that, the first half of a very long novel.

Well, The Sparrow does have sort of an end. So you can stop reading after finishing it. But about half of what I read until now in Children of God (20% in) is extra information about the things that happenend on Rakhat. It really adds to what is told in The Sparrow. For the other half it is the story continuing after Sandoz returned to earth. If you liked The Sparrow I advise to read Children of God after it.

Totally agree with that, Buck; I'm about 80% through and enjoying the novel quite a lot, but I'm undecided yet whether to launch into Children of God straight after. Wait and see how it goes at the end, I guess. Of course, the reverse situation can be infuriating, too: read Neal Stephenson's Seveneves earlier this year - one heck of a long book that really ought to have been two, in my opinion.

It's such a well written book. Although during the reading of the book you know something bad is going to happen, the ending is particularly hard hitting. It's a strange ending in some ways and I have to agree with Leo that's it's written to demonstrate the issue of faith in God. I was surprised how quickly the plot resolved at the end. It was almost out of keeping with the rest of the book. A 4-4.5 stars from me and i'm going to read Children of God now.

I also thought that the first part of the novel could have been shorter, since some of the scenes before the mission was even discussed tended to drag. (There were too many scenes with Anne and George).

(view spoiler)
A plot hole.

No, I don't mean the horrific details involved in its conclusion because the entire novel lead up to that point right from the beginning. No. What I'm referring to is the whole 'Anne and George' thing, especially that bit in zero g - please, who wanted that image planted there! Ugh!




Rosemarie wrote: "My issue is her writing style and characterization. The book is uneven in structure and the writing is turgid at times, with too much detail for the first 100 pages."
My impression was that the writing in the first 100 pages was, stylistically speaking, excellent; though I concede that if the novel had continued in that style it would have gone on for more than 1000 pages.


I've only just started so I guess more bad things to look forward to. I did wonder if after the early revelation if it was going to be a different type of book, clearly not.

Oh, my God.
The climax of this novel is as powerful as any I can think of. It's disturbing, horrifying, appalling, unsettling - I can't think of the right word.
It's not perfect. The writing sometimes gives the impression of being uneven, but in hindsight I can't really find fault with it. As a non-religious reader, the Jesuit arcanity sometimes left me nonplussed, but in the end, I can't say that it was overdone. With all the hints of atrocities, I knew something awful is coming, but it took me completely off guard.
I expect that I will be reading the sequel.

Oh, my God.
The climax of this novel is as powerful as any I can think of. It's disturbing, horrifying, appalling, unsettling - I can't think of the right word...."
I agree it is a powerful novel, this is the second time i've read it and even with knowing the ending in advance the impact is still the same.
I'm reading Children of God at the moment and I second what Leo said about reading it. It does explain various things from the first novel which you probably wondered about. It also continues the story and it's certainly keeping me interested.


I'm not convinced it is more balanced than The Sparrow. It is tying up a lot of loose ends and explaining a lot of what happened in the first novel. The beginning is quite slow paced though but still very readable.



For me if you are hoping for something as good as the Sparrow I think you will be disappointed, so probably best not to read straight afterwards. I hope Leo will comment when he finishes as I would like to know what he made of it.

A big difference between the two books is that in The Sparrow there was the on-going sensation of discovering the new planet and its inhabitants. Also there's a very different type of companions for Sandoz this time, and very different things happening. In Children of God we find that things are not what they seemed to be in The Sparrow. That's also why l think the two books are one story.

I agree the two books are one story in some ways it works better as two separate books as you come out of the one thinking one thing and you start reading the other and are suddenly enlightened. I'm glad I read the book as it's well written, it's just I think I ran out of patience with the Isaac arc by the end.

Books mentioned in this topic
Children of God (other topics)Children of God (other topics)
Children of God (other topics)
Seveneves (other topics)
A Field Guide to Lies: Critical Thinking in the Information Age (other topics)
More...