Read Runners discussion
This topic is about
To Kill a Mockingbird
Archives
>
To Kill a Mockingbird
date
newest »
newest »
message 51:
by
Anirudh
(new)
May 29, 2014 07:47AM
Anoop has dissuaded me from reading this book :-P
reply
|
flag
Sumit wrote: "Bad book? This one? :O No way!"I disagree... Only the court part was good. But it came too late and it took little space in the book. By then I was ready to raise the white flag.
Manju & Sumit - Since we are almost finished , I ask you two to start reading it :) Since its a relatively small book ( at least for you, Mistborners :P ) and this is a weekend ( controls sadness) I hope you will complete it soon :) :)
*demands status updates of Manju and Hulk as me finishes reading and rereading * *goes to the corner and starts fighting with Miss Ini Finch* :P :P
@hp *hi harry finch*:P:P:P *wonders whether sumit boo radley will leave gifts in the tree hole*:-):P:P
When I read a book, especially the ones with an intriguing title, I love to see how it fits in the story. To kill a mockingbird was an interesting title, but I couldn't really find the relation of that, to the story throughout. It was only towards the end, that too a little part justified the title. this important part was too less and I felt it should have been highlighted even more, and a lot sooner
It wasn't awful, but the whole kid kid part, got on my nerves. Plus they called their dad by his name:-/
Hajarath Prasad wrote: "*demands status updates of Manju and Hulk as me finishes reading and rereading * *goes to the corner and starts fighting with Miss Ini Finch* :P :P"
sorry HP I'm yet to start this. But I'll try to start this soon:):)
Anoop - I think the title was justified twice I guess : once at the time of Tom's death , and at the end. And at the end, two characters were justified by the use of the phrase : Boo Radley and Jem Finch. And since the idea was to make Scout understand it's meaning in the truest sense (This is my assumption ), I think the title was completely justified :) But then , to each his own :) :)
I totally agree with the title thing. I literally wait for that particular chapter or paragraph or sentence where I get to know the significance of the book's title.
Hajrath- the phrase was just a passing mention somewhere in the middle.. N it did justify the parts. Not the book :)
http://www.studymode.com/essays/The-S...@Anoop.. here's an explanation for why that title and what it means :) :)
Srividya, it asks me to sign up. That's the explanation?? :D:D:Di will check it out in the evening :)
@Anoop.. here's another one.. this time its the whole thing :) :) *am a little OC when it comes to these things, so don't mind*http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/mocking...
The title is a metaphor for killing innocence. In this case, the death of jem's innocence, where he comes to realize the reality of hate in his town. Also of Tom Robinson who was literally killed despite his innocence. Even that little kid who preferred to be a clown instead of dealing with racism. If you missed the part about why its bad to kill a mockingbird since they only make music and do no harm, the title's meaning would be hard to figure out. It is only mentioned once before the end.




