2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion

This topic is about
For a Few Demons More
For a Few Demons More
>
Question F
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Oct 06, 2016 08:12AM

reply
|
flag
*

Rachel is a very unreliable narrator and her rigid dislike of Trent colors a lot of her interactions with him. She could see things a lot clearer if she'd just learn to listen.
Thank you, Veronica because it just didn't square up in my mind. Why would Trent risk his reputation, etc. by killing these people?
I so agree about Rachel's unreliability. There are times I'm thinking, "Where'd THAT come from?"
I so agree about Rachel's unreliability. There are times I'm thinking, "Where'd THAT come from?"

Once again Trent's approach of the "ends justify the means" test the limits of what is moral. No, he didn't kill the weres but his actions led to their deaths nonetheless and he is responsible.
The fact that Trent was going to alter Rachel's memory bugged me more than the were deaths. Taking away someones free will is a big no-no for me. I'm really glad that it didn't work.
I love that Ciri scared the pants off Trent and Quen, lol!
He definitely tests those limits.
Ciri is pretty awesome! I love that Trent is intimidated by her.
Ciri is pretty awesome! I love that Trent is intimidated by her.

Not to be nit-picky but it's spelled "Ceri", short for Ceridwen. I know it's hard to guess at spelling when you're listening to audiobook. :-) I always liked that the demons use a person's full name - Rachel Mariana Morgan...Trenton Aloysius Kalamack. I can't recall Ceri's full name.

Yes, I love those. Like after the explosion on the boat.

Yeah, I was going to spell Minias "Meneas", but then decided to look it up first :0)

"Good observations, Regina. I think there is always another layer to be gleaned from paying attention to Trent's reactions. Knowing what we know now, he really was giving away a lot if you knew to look for it. "
Which is true for a lot of things in the series, not just Trent. Harrison was always writing a couple of books ahead when she wrote this series, which gave her the luxury of going back into earlier-still-not-published manuscripts to make tweaks or add things if she hit on a great idea in the one she was actually working on. So the reread revealed that there are a lot of clues seeded throughout the books that don't have their ultimate payoff until a few books later. Things that if Rachel had been paying attention or was more open to, would've made a difference. But hindsight is everything so I can't fault Rachel for missing what I also initially missed or glossed over.
I know you ladies will probably not ever reread this series but just wanted to point out that subtext is everything so I'd recommend paying attention to stuff between the lines, body language, etc. :-)

That's really interesting. I'm going to pay more attention going forward.