Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Book & Author Page Issues
>
Please delete this book! (pt. 39) [Anyone requests; leave deletions for superlibrarians]
Kimberly wrote: "Hello! Can you please delete this book (Riordan's Myth) from my book list? It was never published, distributed, or even begun and I have no plans to write it. Thank you!https://www.goodreads.com/..."
#689
Please contact Support who can discuss this with you.
Emy wrote: "#682 Seems to have a different cover. Can you recheck which edition this one should be combined and merged with?."
Emy, correct me if I'm wrong, but according to the Librarian Edits log, you were the one who did the "Reverting image_uploaded_at from change 33233660 image_uploaded_at: 'Wed Sep 26 18:20:25 -0700 2012' to '', resulting both editions to have different covers. When I requested the merge, both editions have the same cover and the information were correct for both pages.
The page you reverted the cover now has the wrong cover; the page indicates it is for an English edition, when the cover is clearly a Japanese cover. However, due to the question you raised... I did look into it and find a somewhat more puzzling situation:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/...
Apparently the page that got its cover changed used to have "9784088467078" for its ISBN13 and actually originally have most information correct (cover and language)... I have no idea why the creator of the page decided to change the language from Japanese to English while also changing the publication date and later the cover, basically converting the page from the Japanese edition to the English edition... It was really confusing.
So, if we want to overlook the weird switch of edition that happened to that page later on, then the page in question should be merged with the Japanese edition
. Whereas, if we want to base on what the edition the page intended to switch to, then the request still stands, if that makes any sense.Let me know how you feel it should be proceeded? I guess I'll be needing to correct how they are combined according to the decision. Anyways, thank you so much for being thorough with the request!
Awake again and working backwards!#701 Gone
#702 First listed edition queued. - Gone
Leaving the invalid ISBN as I don't know whether there was a typo on that copy, but added a note in case we decide later.
Waiting on disappearance of Edn 1 before I can queue the Truncated ISBN edition. EDIT: Truncated ISBN queued - Gone
#703 Queued - Gone
#706 Truncated ISBN queued - Gone
#711 Queued - Gone
#712 Thank you :) Much appreciated!
#714 Queued - Gone
#713 Apologies for making assumptions in my previous explanation, I'll try to be clearer now.As a super, if the reason for merging A into B is that they are duplicates based on cover, I need to look into previous cover changes to see whether a cover was changed wrongly earlier in the Record's life. This is the edit you see above. My question for you is to establish which edition the copy should be paired with. I have no doubt that it is a merge candidate, but I need to be certain that the edition it is paired with matches the data on the one that is there, and it doesn't when looking at the edit history.
Where I must leave it to you to decide:
* Is this an edition created with the cover in the wrong language (not uncommon in that kind of book, unfortunately) - merge goes ahead as previously listed, but with your confirmation.
* Is this an edition of a Japanese edition (cover match), in which case please can you pair it with that and relist.
#709 Argh! *sigh* This may take some time...First part now queued. Gone
First 3, 3 now queued but taking a LOT longer - Gone
2nd 3, 3 now queued - Gone
4th part 1&2 now queued - Gone
4th part 3 now queued - Gone
All gone :)
Emy wrote: "#713 Apologies for making assumptions in my previous explanation, I'll try to be clearer now.
[...]"
No need to apologize! I'm sorry if what I wrote made you feel it is needed! Even when I read what I wrote before posting it, I can see it sounding accusingly, unfortunately I have no idea how to fix that while still conveying my question, so there's that. Anyways, like I said, thank you for being thorough, cuz if you hadn't done so, I doubt I would have dug out the weird past edits.
It seems that the content of the questionable page
was originally basically identical to
; for unknown reasons, it was turned into the English edition, and presumably that's why the latter (
) was created as the Japanese edition disappeared. Come to think of it, I think following the train of thought, the action of switching edition probably should be flagged? I find it highly disrespectful to the edition that was switched out...If it were up to me, then yes, I would prefer for it to be merged to the Japanese edition, however, I am honestly wary and worry for the possibly of people getting into their heads and attempting to make the default an English edition again. Do you think regardlessly we should just proceed anyways? Let me know your thoughts!
Again, thank you SO MUCH for being patient with me! I don't even read this series, was just trying to correct the data on Goodreads for those who do, but I feel that if this were happening to series I do read, I would be even more frustrated, so I'm really appreciating the help you are offering. =D
Firstly - changes made contrary to policy should (almost) always be flagged. Occasionally it's worth checking who made the changes, e.g., Staff, but almost always it's flaggable - and you'll recognise the names pretty quickly too! If you have flagged changes, though, I'd hold off on the request for a day or so to give Staff time to take a look (I'm not confident that data on changes persists if the copy is removed). I we, as librarians, make changes as above based on consensus or other discussions, my advice would always be to link to the discussion in the Change Comment with as much detail as possible. It makes it SO much easier to figure out what happened and why... Unfortunately not all people do that bit so we're left guessing.My feeling with this one is that it was set up as Japanese in 2012
The same editor changed it to English three months later, and changed the cover a number of times.
In 2013 a Librarian moved the ISBN13 to the Japanese edition - this I feel is when it should have been merged.
Are you OK with it being merged into the Japanese edition?
Hello! Some duplicates need merging.Correct:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
Duplicate:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
Thanks :)
Renske wrote: "660-663 done664 All editions look valid, the first has a Kindle edition and a paperback and the second has tow different covers, so no merges needed.
This title republished as hence the new cover and different editions... that's why I was requesting the remove of the following https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2... and ensuring my reviews would be merged with the new edition. This title http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28... is no longer in publication that's why I was asking for its removal and requesting if the reviews could be retained.
665 done"
Cara wrote: "Renske wrote: "660-663 done664 All editions look valid, the first has a Kindle edition and a paperback and the second has tow different covers, so no merges needed.
This title republished as he..."
Goodreads does not remove valid editions, including editions that are now out of print. If you need assistance with setting up Alternate Cover edition for the first title, please start a new thread.
Please, I think this one is a duplicate:Original: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
Duplicate: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
Thanks!
Emy wrote: "#702 First listed edition queued. - Gone
Leaving the invalid ISBN as I don't know whether there was a typo on that copy, but added a note in case we decide later.
Waiting on disappearance of Edn 1 before I can queue the Truncated ISBN edition. EDIT: Truncated ISBN queued - Gone"
Thank you, Emy! :-)
I think we could safely merge the remaining two editions. They are almost certainly the same.
Only difference is the number of pages. In the one with correct ISBN it is 176, the other has 256. I own a copy of the very book with the correct ISBN, so 256 is the correct info, double-checked on publisher´s book page. However, Brazilian Amazon says "176", but I guess this is a mistake.
Published year is 1988 (book CIP data). I'll fix that later. In my opinion there may have been a reprint in 2013 (date quoted in Brazilian Amazon), but I could find no reference to another edition. Publisher mentions no date. World Cat mentions only 1988 publication.
If I find any reference in the future I can add a different edition then.
I'll let this final decision to you. Thanks again!
#720 has been done#721 cover is different from default (position of "Foreword" under author's name)
#723 done
#725 done
#727 done
#728 done
These two books should be merged, same edition listed separately under ISBN-10 and ISBN-13:Nothing is True and Everything is Possible: Adventures in Modern Russia
Please, merge these books:https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
Thanks!
المدرب wrote: "No 700 still bending"#700 still in wrong thread! :) Author's should be in the author merge thread, this is for books.
Hi! Please could you delete these books from my author dashboard and the Goodreads database?Short story 1: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
Short story 2: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
Kind regards,
Giles Blackley
#731 done#732 done
#733 not done; covers are slightly different (most noticable the spot of light in the left bottom corner). There were two editions of the edition without isbn; I have merged one of them.
#736 Giles wrote: "Hi! Please could you delete these books from my author dashboard and the Goodreads database?Short story 1: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
Short story 2: https:..."
GR does not delete books that are no longer available.
Please see https://www.goodreads.com/help/show/2... and https://www.goodreads.com/help/show/3...
Please merge with default https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...Looks like it was meant to be a placeholder and an incorrect pub date was added (book published 7/24/12, not 7/10/12).
Please delete this unfinished fanfiction mistakenly added thinking complete:https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
Duplicate, please merge:https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
Please merge https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2... with https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2... and recombine.ETA: Re-separated editions, author had recombined them.
Hello! I noticed recently that someone added a duplicate of my book, Can't Stay Away. Could somebody please combine or delete the new one? Thanks!Correct book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
Duplicate book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...Please delete this book (978-1-941203-19-4) AND (978-1-941203-14-9) called THE WAKING STAR. The publisher has cancelled both editions. The material is being repackaged under a different name, different ISBN.
Thanks for your help!
I am an author and another author of the same name shows up as my work - how can i remove their books from my author profile?
Emy wrote: "My feeling with this one is that it was set up as Japanese in 2012
The same editor changed it to English three months later, and changed the cover a number of times.
In 2013 a Librarian moved the ISBN13 to the Japanese edition - this I feel is when it should have been merged."
My conclusion exactly! (Sorry! For some reason I missed your reply!)
About flagging though, again I'm not exactly sure just which one of during the course of action is the one to be pinpointed as violation... it didn't like to be all done in one go? (I don't know if only supers are able to check past images used for book covers; if regular librarians can do so, I have yet to figure out how); I'm guessing actions done on Mar 27, 2012 12:19PM is an indication, but then the one done on Jun 12, 2012 04:30PM is also a defining moment cuz of the change of publication date.... Should I be flagging ALL the questionable edits? (still not quite sure how it works)
Thanks for being patient with me.
To answer your question though; yes, I would like the page to be merged with the Japanese page. But I do think Staff should be seeing this as well. BTW, how exactly will we know if the Staff has seen it? Do we get to know at all? Cuz I have flagged stuff before, and well, I never heard back from them (and I'm not even sure if I was supposed to), so in this case, I don't know when the merge could be proceeded. (Also needed to figure exactly what to flag) (I think I'll definitely do the one for language change and then the one for publication change; as I can't verify the images. Let me know if you think others should be flagged as well)
Thanks!
Douglas wrote: "I am an author and another author of the same name shows up as my work - how can i remove their books from my author profile?"Douglas, you let us know either the other authors book titles or your own. But this isn't the best place to post it. A new thread in Issues is a better spot, as a super may not need to address this.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Alice in Wonderland, and, Through the Looking-Glass (other topics)Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland / Through the Looking-Glass (other topics)
裸足でバラを踏め [Hadashi de Bara wo Fume] 8 (other topics)
Surviving Gretchen (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Cecil Bødker (other topics)NOT A BOOK (other topics)
NOT A BOOK (other topics)










#685 Already gone - see edit to original reply
#686 Queued
#687 First queued, need to wait to queue 2
#688 Queued
#690 Queued, haven't checked the pagination though - will leave that to your judgement here :)
#691 Queued
#692 Queued. Are you OK with the recombine as I don't want to mess it up with a less familiar script. Also, please could you add the author name in the same script as the book record? If translated into English, it needs both versions, if never translated, just the original script is fine.
#693 Queued
#694 Different (earlier) publication date - possibly an original cover edition but not sure if we can ever know!
#695 Queued
#696 Queued
#697 Queued
#698 Gone
#699 Queued. In future please can you separate out Dupe+Target (unless into default edition of course!). This stops us accidentally merging into the wrong edition.
EDIT: All gone except second extra Tintin which is queued now.