World, Writing, Wealth discussion
The Lounge: Chat. Relax. Unwind.
>
Astronauts/cosmonauts working conditions
date
newest »



When the cost of bringing to orbit a single kilo is in the thousands of dollars, I hope you didn't marry someone that looks like Nicky Minaj!


-:)
Nicki's starring on musical orbit

Sounds complex
I believe that the Virgin Galactic solution, with a small orbiter carried aloft to high altitude by a transporter aircraft before being released, is the ideal solution at the moment: both vehicles are reusable and the cost per kilo sent to orbit way down compared to conventional rockets.

It should be the cheapest option at the moment but I am convinced there will be cheaper better developments, given time.


I don't think that someone who spent their entire life in pursuit of one of the very few seats on top of a giant stick of dynamite would think that way.
https://youtu.be/mhpFpHLCuEA



Hadfield's point had two parts:
1.) Accept necessary risks
2.) Figure out how to master those risks
We can't eliminate risk. But we can rationally examine that risk, and modify our behavior accordingly. There is a difference between cowering and minimizing contact with the enemy.
These guys or gals sometimes spend a little under or even over a year in the outer space. While I personally suspected that it might be a way to avoid paying child support, officially they are all claimed to be working -:)
But what kind of working conditions are that?
Why NASA or Roscosmos don't bring spouses to the orbit every once in a while? Where are the astro/cosmonauts unions to intervene?
What do you think?