Stephen King Fans discussion
Recommendations
>
Which version of The Stand??
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Colton
(new)
Jun 24, 2016 05:45PM

reply
|
flag

There's some little things like one has snickers and the other is chocolate Paydays, LOL Things like this don't really make a difference but funny they were changed.
I honestly don't think it matters which one you read. If you already have one version then just read that.
Some might have a strong preference over one or the other but I woudn't worry about it. You can can always try to find the original later and say you've read both!



The cuts made to the novel may have been made to fit it into the 823 pages that was the limit a novel could be at the time (based on the printing technology), but the edits were very judicious and focused the novel brilliantly. Now it's a sprawling mess.
The 1978 version is my 2nd favorite King book. The 1990 version is my least favorite. I got into a discussion about this with some people at King's Dallas signing for 11/22/63 and the lines were pretty evenly split. Most of the people who liked the original had read that one first; those that liked the 1990 version were younger and had read that one first.

The 1978 version doesn't suffer from the edits at all. Just read what you have access to.




If you are looking for quality the version is not the issue, the book is. I have only read the uncut version it's atrocious both in terms of plotting and pacing. Feel free to check it out, just consider yourself warned.


I was reading a google doc that someone had going, keeping track of all the changes between the two on a chapter by chapter basis. There are quite a lot, and some of them change the tone a pretty good deal, adding a bit more humor in the uncut.
