CLOG - Comedy Literature Only Group discussion
Setting a good example
date
newest »


Even with double speech marks there is a choice between the symmetrical " and the classical 66 and 99, as we used to call them when we were kids.
Kids are pretty resilient and flexible. They will usually understand.

I was told it should be single. However, I wasn't taught in school which was correct and I don't believe it's taught now whether double or single are correct. I think things like this have gone by the by.
Books have changed quite a lot in terms of what should and shouldn't be done in terms of Double and Single quotation.
I know this can be frustrating for a lot of readers or writers who work in the correct, standard way but I think this has changed massively in recent years.
I've always used doubles but I agree with Will; I think it's a style issue.
I once heard the suggestion that it saves publishers money by reducing the amount of ink needed on big print runs. I have no idea whether that's a genuine consideration, though. It sounds unlikely. Personally, I use doubles because it allows me to differentiate between speech and content that feels like it should be put in (single) inverted commas.
I once heard the suggestion that it saves publishers money by reducing the amount of ink needed on big print runs. I have no idea whether that's a genuine consideration, though. It sounds unlikely. Personally, I use doubles because it allows me to differentiate between speech and content that feels like it should be put in (single) inverted commas.
Surely a publisher should take some care when printing a book that is aimed at children, and from an author with a track record of high sales volumes? How can we expect the next generation to possess good writing skills if bad examples are present in such a widely read book?