YA Buddy Readers' Corner ♥ discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
300 views
Challenge Archive > The May Page Count Challenge 2016

Comments Showing 51-100 of 778 (778 new)    post a comment »

Nicole's Book Diaries (nicolesbookdiaries) | 2265 comments Im in! Medium please!


message 52: by Sarah Elizabeth (new)

Sarah Elizabeth (bookworm_sarah) | 90931 comments Mod
Added ☺


message 53: by ❤ Aly ❤ (new)

❤ Aly ❤ | 3575 comments I'm in for medium please


message 54: by Sarah Elizabeth (new)

Sarah Elizabeth (bookworm_sarah) | 90931 comments Mod
Added ☺


Irena BookDustMagic | 1344 comments Count me in for Fun this month! :)


message 56: by Sarah Elizabeth (new)

Sarah Elizabeth (bookworm_sarah) | 90931 comments Mod
Added ☺


message 57: by Melanie (new)

Melanie (lovebeingvegan) | 13891 comments I love this!!! I'll now finally have the incentive to read the longer books on my shelf! :)

I'm in for serious and could I please be on a team with Megan this month? :)


message 58: by Sarah Elizabeth (new)

Sarah Elizabeth (bookworm_sarah) | 90931 comments Mod
Added ☺


message 59: by Tati (new)

Tati Serious!


message 60: by Tiffany (new)

Tiffany Heywood (tiffthebooknerd) | 1563 comments Fun team please


message 61: by Sarah Elizabeth (new)

Sarah Elizabeth (bookworm_sarah) | 90931 comments Mod
Added ☺


message 62: by Gillian (new)

Gillian Murrell | 3686 comments Serious please :)


message 63: by Katherine (new)

Katherine | 16 comments serious please.


message 64: by Amy (new)

Amy | 2535 comments I'll join a medium team please. :)


message 65: by Maddie (last edited Apr 15, 2016 04:46PM) (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
I'm in for medium, but I'm not sure if I should go for serious, because this month I'm doing really well with books. Na, I'll stick with medium, because next month I'm also not reading as many short books.


message 66: by Brooke (new)

Brooke ♥booklife4life♥ (booklife4life) | 6447 comments in for serious as always ;)


message 67: by Brooke (new)

Brooke ♥booklife4life♥ (booklife4life) | 6447 comments not to ruffles anyone feathers but i dont think its really fair to ask to be on teams with other people. the whole point is to meet new people and branch out and i feel like if your asking to be paired with someone, its an unfair advantage. just my opinion thou.


message 68: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments I see your point, but what makes this challenge a lot more fun with me is getting to do it with my best friend (allison), since we see each other every day and therefore discuss it constantly with each other, whether it be books to read or new strategies. To me, it just makes it so much more fun


message 69: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments Also, for me personally this isn't necessarily to meet new people, but to persuade me to read my books. Meeting new people is definitely a caused benefit, but not my main reason for being here /:


message 70: by Abby (new)

Abby | 5404 comments Brooke wrote: "not to ruffles anyone feathers but i dont think its really fair to ask to be on teams with other people. the whole point is to meet new people and branch out and i feel like if your asking to be pa..."

I completely agree. If everyone asked to be with a friend, it'd be a huge mess and exceptions shouldn't be made for anyone who asks.


message 71: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
I also feel that way Brooke, and also because that way you get to know who's a fast reader and who isn't, so you can ask to be on a fast reader's team, which is also an unfair advantage.


message 72: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
And Meaghan, can't you discuss books if you're on different teams?


message 73: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments Well with the fast reader thing, there are enough fast readers to balance each other out. And with being on the same team as my friend when discussing strategy and books, it gives everything a different edge when you're competitive together, and fighting for the same goal


message 74: by Brooke (new)

Brooke ♥booklife4life♥ (booklife4life) | 6447 comments meaghan that kinda proves my point, you have an unfair advantage of being on a personal level with them and being able to work better together because of that.


message 75: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments Not really though? Everything we discuss we would've otherwise discussed in the group chat. It just makes it more fun for me to discuss in person, and another fun thing my friend and I can do together


message 76: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments I just don't think it's causing enough of a problem or advantage that can't be nullified to remove it


message 77: by Tati (new)

Tati it's the discussing in person and being able to read side by side and egg each other on that makes it kind of unfair. Other teams are struggling with time zones and wonky internet access, for instance


Berit☀️✨  (berittalksbooks) I think the problem is you girls are going to have been on the winning team the last two months, and I think there is an obvious advantage to seen somebody on your team every day, rather than just communicating with them online.
Maybe it would be fun for you girls to compete against one another next month ;-)
I'm just saying I knew at the beginning of this month that team Los Angeles was going to dominate the rest of us, and it happened, and honestly it has not motivated me at all, so yes you want to be motivated, but everyone else does as well, to be completely honest :-)


message 79: by Tati (new)

Tati the way I see it (otherwise I'll get too unmotivated to keep reading), the serious teams are only NY and Chicago, that is a thrilling scoreboard! they were tied for two days in a row, then Chicago was ahead by 2 measly points and who knows what the situation will be tomorrow? And that is what makes the whole thing exciting for me


message 80: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
Yeah, because if you have the same people in the same team all the time, where's the competition in that?


message 81: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments I don't think us winning has anything to do with that though. Both Allison and I read average books for a serious member last month, and this month my excessive reading isn't caused by being in the same team as her. I would've read the same being on her team or not, but being on the same team has made it more fun. And I don't know what happened this month, but I don't think us being so many points ahead is because of Allison and I


Berit☀️✨  (berittalksbooks) @Tati that is the best way to look at it! I can't believe we've actually been tied, that really never happens :-)


message 83: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
Well either way, I think it's quite unfair being able to choose teams.


message 84: by Anna 'Bookbuyer' (new)

Anna 'Bookbuyer' (bookbuyer) | 22764 comments Berit wrote: "@Tati that is the best way to look at it! I can't believe we've actually been tied, that really never happens :-)"

Especially with their only being three teams for each level this month it makes it even more exciting and challenging! :D


message 85: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments I honestly see what you guys are all saying, but it's really not affecting how much Allison and I area reading as it seems I guess. Our lead this time isn't because I asked to be on the same team as Allison, but because almost everyone in our team is turning in a book a day or every two days, often over 450 pages and with buddy reads. It's also not like Allison and I both read a book or two books a day, because in that sense, it might be a little unfair. I just happened to be having a good month this month, but I know Allison hasn't been reading as much as she'd like, and is reading a book every 2 to 3 days.


message 86: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments We're not exactly choosing teams though, just one mem ever we want to be with. If people were asking more than 2 people to be in the same team, that's more unfair because then half or more of the team is being decided by the players. In the case of two, there can still be tons of possibilities, and reading skills can be evened out


message 87: by Brooke (new)

Brooke ♥booklife4life♥ (booklife4life) | 6447 comments yah but if everybody's asking for one person that messes up how sara figures out the teams. i think it should be 100% random for teams.


message 88: by Melanie (new)

Melanie (lovebeingvegan) | 13891 comments I have to side with Meaghan. I don't think it's unfair at all -- it's just one person and isn't this whole challenge supposed to be for fun? If having a friend on your team makes it more fun and motivates you to read more, what's the big deal?
And regarding being the leading team two months in a row -- we never would have been that if it wouldn't have been for the whole team. It's rarely just one or two people.


message 89: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments Yea Melanie said it perfectly. I did one challenge without Allison (my first one), and even though we won and I did have fun, I was less involved just because we weren't discussing it everyday. There's a huge difference between competing and working together, and if we were competing, it just wouldn't be as fun for me. I don't think it's having a huge effect on the competition, if any at all. If everyone started pairing up then maybe a change would be needed, but it's only be 3 or 4 people doing it every challenge, even though everyone has always had the option too. A lot of people might do this to meet people, and for them going solo is perfect, but some of us are using it as motivation, and having my friend on my team just makes it more fun. (I know it helps her too, because she's not the most talkative with those she doesn't know online all the time, and her notifications are wonky so I keep her updated too. I don't think that's negatively affecting anyone though, me being able to help her or her helping me)


message 90: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
Backing out now.


message 91: by Brooke (new)

Brooke ♥booklife4life♥ (booklife4life) | 6447 comments its not just one person thou, its been getting worse each month, there is 4 people asking for a friend. if i read 40 books and my bf in my group reads the same 40 books and we buddy read together, that makes a big difference. i didnt want to start a fight, it was just something ive notice and see that its getting worse as we go. maybe im just PMSing and am upset that no one asks to be on my team, haha. it just irks me a bit and doesn't give me a lot of motivation when i see people asking and getting paired up.


message 92: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
Yeah that's true about the buddy reads!


message 93: by Tati (new)

Tati for me, the whole principle of it is just wrong. Teams are not supposed to be pick and choose, even if you're choosing just one member.


message 94: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
Especially if you have the option to talk to them beforehand and sort them out.


message 95: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments A lot of people BR within teams though, and in the case of BRing with a friend that's the same thing. The amount of BRs I do with her doesn't change if we're in the same team or not, and it's not affected by the fact we're friends, because we only BR books we both wanted to read, not forcing each other to try books just because we're friends. And I haven't really been noticing it getting worse, I could've sworn February had more people buddying up, but I could just be remembering it wrong


message 96: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments Yea I get the whole idea of not picking your teams, I really do. I just don't think this is really hurting anyone, and it's not excessive, so I thought that if it's not hurting anyone or giving huge advantages, but still makes the challenges more fun for people, I don't see any harm in it /:


message 97: by Maddie (new)

Maddie (maddisonbruce) | 53684 comments Mod
Yeah I get the fact that challenges are meant to be fun, but the point of it is to challenge yourself, right? Not just cruise on through. The amount of times I've had 'but it's for fun so no stress' thrown in my face just get annoying. I join challenges to push myself and to actually challenge myself, and sometimes it isn't that fun because you have to read books you sometimes wouldn't in some challenges, but I don't mind that. I think just having random teams makes it more of a surprise and a challenge.


message 98: by Tati (new)

Tati to be quite blunt, I don't care if it's harmful or not, it doesn't make it less wrong


Berit☀️✨  (berittalksbooks) I guess we can all agree to disagree!
But, in my opinion, there is a clear advantage especially when it comes to BR points when you are with a close friend, especially a close RL friend.

And I've been doing these monthly challenges for over a year, and just recently I've seen people asked to be on the same team as others, and it has gotten a little worse this month.
Having said that, if I had a close friend that was involved in this group in RL I would also love for her to be on my team.


message 100: by Meaghan (new)

Meaghan (ectophine) | 3596 comments Having Allison (or any friend for that matter) doesn't make me take any challenge easier though. I've read books I wasn't planning too and maybe didn't even end up liking while on her team. It's just the fact that we're being challenged together, and then can talk about it afterwards that makes it fun. I'm pushing myself every month, and that doesn't change just because I have a friend with me


back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.