2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion
This topic is about
Where Serpents Sleep
Where Serpents Sleep
>
Question D
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Apr 07, 2016 12:04PM
Mod
reply
|
flag
Early on, I assumed she'd gone to the country to have a baby, with no idea who the father might be. At some point, it became clear to me that she had been abused by her father.
There are only a handful of reasons a girl from her social status would choose to flee her family and work as a prostitute. Unfortunately, a child out of wedlock is the least of the evils and it turned out to be an even worse one.
I had the same thought as Charlene initially but then, as the story progressed, that wasn't making sense. Something about the tie-in to her mother's death and her change in behavior had me start go look at her father. But, it only dawned on me about a minute before it was sort of revealed.
Initially I thought pregnancy too, since sending young girls off was a standard way to deal with that back then, but I started to suspect sexual abuse about the same time as Sebastian. I just wasn't sure if it was the father or the brother.
Yeah, I was initially leaning towards the brother and figured the father found out about it but covered it up. As it ends up, I don't think the brother has any idea.
I thought it was the father only because of her intensity to leave her life behind and not return. And also his steadfast denials were suspicious. I wondered if the brother knew or was involved. I did think she ran away because she became pregnant by her father.
No one talked about it and who could even go there. The girls only knew because they were victims. Rachel never told her sister, who guessed only when she saw a change in her young sister's behavior.
Jonetta wrote: "Kudos to you for figuring that out, Kris."
Thanks Jonetta! I've been reading too many mysteries, lol.
Thanks Jonetta! I've been reading too many mysteries, lol.
I thought similarly, Stephanie, but just didn't want to lay blame at another victim. What a horrible situation for her.
I just wonder why -when she noticed the changes in Rachel - she didn't look further into knowing what happened to her.
Charlene wrote: "I wondered how her brother could not know about this abuse by their father."I thought the brother had been off at school. Sons of wealthy families were basically sent off to expensive boarding schools for most of the year, weren't they? It's conceivable that he would have no knowledge.
Veronica wrote: "It's conceivable that he would have no knowledge. "Agreed. He would have been away at school and probably had no idea.
Yea, I thought it was bad on her sister's fault to leave her with her father, since he abused her. I was surprised that it was her father, I was expecting it to be her brother that sexually abused her.



