The Sword and Laser discussion
May Pick: More Democracy? SORT OF!
date
newest »

message 51:
by
John (Nevets)
(new)
Apr 10, 2016 11:18AM

reply
|
flag

I really liked it. My review.


Isdihara wrote: "Why are we not considering the novel "Shaman?" (I liked "Aurora" very much and have not read 2312, just for disclosure.)"
There are way more books not in this poll than are. So I'm not sure how o answer that. I picked these four because they looked good to me. It's not a judgement on the literally thousands of books that I didn't pick.
There are way more books not in this poll than are. So I'm not sure how o answer that. I picked these four because they looked good to me. It's not a judgement on the literally thousands of books that I didn't pick.

Maybe a little bit OT -- but is there any chance in the future we could find out the next month's book choice sooner so we can have time to get the book before the read starts ? (3 weeks maybe?)
It takes awhile to get the books sometimes - it often takes me so long to get books from the library that I can't start the pick of the month until the following month (I'm still waiting for ATBITS ha-ha).
I know I can read the book any time, it would just be nice to be able to follow the discussions IRT :)


I still don't have a copy of ADSOM, and since I'm trying to spend less on entertainment and I was able to to discuss TFS this month, I've decided to put it off until I can borrow it. *checks Overdrive* Still 7th in line.

I still don't have a copy of ADSOM, and since I'm tryi..."
Does your library offer Hoopla services? I'm listening to ADSOM through them. It's a free app on your phone (or website on your laptop) but the catch is, your library has to be affiliated with them for your library card to get you access. Might be worth looking into?

I still don't have a copy of ADSOM, and..."
I don't know if it will be a shorter wait on Hoopla than Overdrive, but I can at least check it out, thanks.

I still don't have a co..."
No wait on Hoopla. It's either an ebook or an audiobook and it's an instant dl that disappears after a couple weeks.

Dude. There's tv shows in here for borrowing, too. Not a huge selection, but they have Farscape, which I've been meaning to watch. Thanks, Meaghan, this is an amazing find!

Dude. There's tv shows in here for borrowing, too. Not a huge..."
You're welcome :)

There are some downsides about announcing a book too early IMHO.
I for one think people should read on their own time, but we always have a few members who read the book immediately.
If that's nearly a month before the book is actually the pick, then where do those people post? Do they start threads 2 or 3 weeks ahead of the group?
Not to mention, there is often a thread from at least one person whose giving up on the book before the month begins. I find that discouraging to people who haven't even finished this month's pick, or were debating if they are going to read the next month.
So personally, I think 1-2 weeks lead time is sufficient, and Tom and Veronica have been really good about that lately. It's going to be hard to ever strike the right balance for everyone in a group this large though.
I for one think people should read on their own time, but we always have a few members who read the book immediately.
If that's nearly a month before the book is actually the pick, then where do those people post? Do they start threads 2 or 3 weeks ahead of the group?
Not to mention, there is often a thread from at least one person whose giving up on the book before the month begins. I find that discouraging to people who haven't even finished this month's pick, or were debating if they are going to read the next month.
So personally, I think 1-2 weeks lead time is sufficient, and Tom and Veronica have been really good about that lately. It's going to be hard to ever strike the right balance for everyone in a group this large though.

IF they don't give reasons, yes, but otherwise this is tantamount to saying we only want positive feedback. If someone picks a book up, gives it a fair chance (say, 100 pages) and dislikes it enough to not finish.... isn't it just as valid to post that as to post "OMG I read this n one gulp and LOVED IT" ?
As long as people give reasons and details about their opinions it seems to me a negative opinion is just as valid as a positive one. If another reader is that easily put off that's their issue. This is, after all, a discussion forum - people who are uncomfortable with differing opinions are probably in the wrong place in that sense.

It's got some of the same content. I find Hoopla is really hit and miss with things. Overdrive has a lot more but if you can get it on Hoopla there's no wait time... which is the upside. So I usually check Hoopla first before I get on a waitlist at the library or on Overdrive.
I don't care if someone doesn't like the book and gives a well thought out reason..but we constantly get "I'm lemming the book threads" way before the group read has started. And they rarely have any real reason why. That's all I was talking about.


Ignore them. If all you want to do is read your favorite author then you shouldn't join a book club in the first place.
I at least give the book a shot.

Actually, I've noticed the announcement threads used to be much less spoilery in general. Now it seems people use them to discuss the book, possibly because the announcement is up a few days before a discussion thread is posted at the beginning of the month?
I can make it a point to add (No Spoilers) to the title..but they are already pretty long.
I'm not really sure why so many people have started discussing the book in detail in those threads. It's meant for pre-month buzz and to make sure people are aware of the pick.
I don't recall things ever getting too spoilery though, or I'd yell at people :)
I'm not really sure why so many people have started discussing the book in detail in those threads. It's meant for pre-month buzz and to make sure people are aware of the pick.
I don't recall things ever getting too spoilery though, or I'd yell at people :)


I for one think people should read on their own time, but we always have a few members who read the book immediately.
If that's ..."
It's too bad some people try to ruin it for others by posting early about reading or lemming a book. But it's honestly pretty discouraging for me to not be able to join in the discussions at all because I haven't been able to get the book till after the month is over and the rest of the group has moved on. Not all of us are fast readers who can grab a 500 page book and start it mid-month and be finished before the month is over. A week is really not enough time to get a book, and some of us can't afford to buy them every month. I guess I just wish it was not so difficult to participate.



My library has Overdrive, Freegal, Zinio, Hoopla and Lynda.com so I can usually get the book of the month in one form or another. I was just talking about people who do not live in urban areas with large library systems.


Whabah? So...many...apps.

Only a full primary would have legitimacy! :)

Boaty McBoatface is next months choice."
It'll probably have the most votes but it'll be dismissed anyway.
and the winner is Aurora by Kim Stanley Robinson
Aurora 87 votes 35.2%
Planetfall 64 votes 25.9%
New Moon 59 votes 23.9%
The Red: First Light 33 votes 13.4%
Toal: 247 Votes
Aurora 87 votes 35.2%
Planetfall 64 votes 25.9%
New Moon 59 votes 23.9%
The Red: First Light 33 votes 13.4%
Toal: 247 Votes

We will know in a few days, but it is possible we will have Hugo nominated work for the current voting cycle 2 months in a row.
If I remember correctly they usually don't release the voter packets for a few more weeks, otherwise it might be another way to read the book, if it is nominated.


Now now Stephen, stop using core math ... :)
275 of 22,515 is only 1%

We should have a Contested Convention where we pick a book that wasn't in the original poll.
Something by this guy maybe
Books mentioned in this topic
Cybernetics of the Sacred (other topics)Aurora (other topics)
The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet (other topics)
Antarctica (other topics)
2312 (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Kim Stanley Robinson (other topics)Neal Stephenson (other topics)
Vernor Vinge (other topics)