Audiobooks discussion
The MOVIE Was Better Than the Book ?

Not The Hobbit book vs movies though :P
And I'd agree with Jerry on Mark Millar adaptations. Not that the comics themselves aren't great, but the movies are another level.

Absolutely! The BBC miniseries of P&P (Colin Firth & Jennifer Ehle) is the best adaption ever! The feature-length movie w/ Kiera Knightley totally missed the mark.
For Emma, you should watch the Gwyneth Paltrow/Jeremy Northram version of Emma, & you'll see that it's really about "Coming of Age", in the sense of "Growing the H*** Up & Realizing You Don't Know Everyything." Then you may have enough sympathy for Emma starting out, to stick with the book. It's awesome in its (I think)sympathetic portrayal of an unreliable narrator.
I've heard many people say that the Forrest Gump movie was much better than the book(tho I never read the book, so I wouldn't know)

It's funny that you mention Forrest Gump because according to this article the reason there was never a second book is because the author hated the movie so much he decided not to write it!
http://mentalfloss.com/article/31001/...

Oh! THERE'S where I read about how much Stephen King hated The Shining! I'd looked for where I'd read that but had trouble finding the exact quote I was remembering...

Interesting link Susie. I have to say I was very sceptical when Cruise was cast as Lestat, but he did a wonderful job. That was when I began to rate him as an actor. The Queen of the Damned was a truly awful film.


Whatney gets everything done in a jiffy, from Oxygen creation to potatoes to nuclear power source to pathfinder. Doesnt feel the struggle nor science.
Nasa is super chill, PR was useless, jus happened to be there. "Dont tell the crew, oh u did? Its ok."
Oh, the chineese one is lost, no problem. He will be fine.
I literally laughed out loud on Donald Glover solving rocket science.
I dont know , it was too cliche. I enjoyed the book for it felt more engineering, movie is more just drama. Movie isnt bad, but definitely not greater than the book. Again this is just my opinion

Whatney gets everything done in a jiffy, from Oxygen creation to potatoes to nuclear power source..."
I'd tend to agree although I did enjoy both. I do find it odd that people on this audio forum (with recommendations) had indicated they thought the book was humorous. I thought it was a serious book, and the whole tale of ingenuity and survival was very engaging. I felt the movie tended to miss it in terms of when they were trying to be humorous, especially with the incessant jokes about the disco music, which he idiotically kept on listening to. I heard someone say that was probably a studio thing trying to cash in on the Guardians of the Galaxy soundtrack phenomenon, which I think was a pretty good observation.
By default though I love ANY movie, fictional or non fictional featuring more or less realistic current, past or near future space exploration. And that includes stuff like Europa Report and I even dare to say Apollo 18 (that film did a phenomenal job on sets, and I finally got an understanding from that film on what it would have been like in the Apollo Missions LEM, which I never got from ANY other film or documentary - so I'll always defend that movie).


YES Exactly! A fellow fan. That is exactly right on the LEM. I'm an Apollo nut, and devour everything visually I can find on it, and Apollo 18 was by far the FIRST that gave any idea of what it was like existing in the LEM, just spacially, hammocks etc. That film was incredible. Even the fictional soviet LEM was apparently from designs. But for some reason people couldn't get past "rocks" (which I didn't object to as a concept - what else would a lifeform do that existed in an airless cold environment when there was no activity?). Sure it is implausible but what movie isn't (very few...).

I just got that in the mail today can't wait to watch it tonight!

I grew up in the Apollo era watching Neil Armstrong walk on the moon for the first time; watching the American and Soviet astronauts shake hands in space for the first time in the Apollos/Soyuz project, and of course we mustn't forget Skylab. When I had cable I used to watch the NASA channel frequently especially the ISS updates.
Apollo 18 should become a classic space movie, IMHO. I agree that the moon rock creatures were implausible, but I thought they fit well with the movie, and really are they any more implausible than the aliens in the ever popular Aliens series or Predator movies?


I just got that in the mail today can't wait to watch it tonight!"
Hope you find it as riveting as I did!

I know, people get caught up so much on odd things. Like a good friend of mine I lent him a J-Horror film Hypnosis which I found really creepy. He liked other horror and J-Horror as I did so thought he might like it. His explanation though on why he didn't like it was "I don't believe in hypnosis". He actually used the word "believe". Riiiight... So Sadoko coming out of a TV set was OK, ghosts of people are OK, zombies are OK, werewolves are OK, vampires are OK, aliens with molecular acid for blood that don't just digest themselves are OK. But hypnosis? That is just ridiculous...

Have to think about it more. I think Trainspotting is better than the book because it's written in Edinburgh dialect that translates easier on screen. The memoirs of junkies really do have profound impact on screen. Another is Requiem For a Dream.
But not Naked Lunch. I haven't read all of the Hunger Games. I haven't seen all the movies either. Have to think about it.
The film trilogies for the Divergent series... those movies are pretty terrible, with the exception of number one which is so-so.
But not Naked Lunch. I haven't read all of the Hunger Games. I haven't seen all the movies either. Have to think about it.
The film trilogies for the Divergent series... those movies are pretty terrible, with the exception of number one which is so-so.
The Bourne Identity , film, much better than the book.
Specifically the character of Marie is better and Jason (in movie)
does not slap her around for being hysterical as he does in the book. The book is from 1980. The old technology can be jarring. Have not read anymore in the series. Put off by the slapping of the heroine.
Specifically the character of Marie is better and Jason (in movie)
does not slap her around for being hysterical as he does in the book. The book is from 1980. The old technology can be jarring. Have not read anymore in the series. Put off by the slapping of the heroine.
I enjoyed the film, "Children of Men " better than the book written by P.D.James


"Presumed Innocent" (Scott Turrow) was a pretty good book I picked up in an audible sale. I think Harrison Ford made it a better movie.

Much agreement on this! I saw the movie first and loved it. I later went back and read the book. I have no problem with things being different. That is the nature of an adaption. But I just didn't enjoy it as much.

The Maze Runner
The Postman
movie and book were equal:
The Road
The Reader
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
The Martian
The Silver Linings Playbook
Shutter Island

The Maze Runner
The Postman
movie and book were equal:
The Road
The Reader
[book:The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo|2429..."
Great list Saeed!

Funny, I liked the book better than the movie... <><

I agree also that Stardust the movie is more enjoyable.
Most disappointed in the Harry Potter adaptations. There was so much to discover and they butchered the books creating the movies.





Am planning on reading The Lost World. Am interested in seeing how he brings 2 people back in the 2nd Jurassic book...


As it happens the films were okay if you divorced Cruise's version of Jack Reacher from the book version and pretended you were watching something new.

They were only mostly dead.

They were only mostly dead."
I just love Princess Bride references! Speaking of which, I've never read the book--last I looked only an abridged version was available on Audible--but I suspect I would be missing the movie voices if I ever read it.

They were only mostly dead."
I just l..."
Ever listened to As You Wish: Inconceivable Tales from the Making of The Princess Bride?

They were only mostly d..."
I loved that book! Cary Elwes was wonderful along with the other narrators. I had no idea what a good mimic Elwes was until listening to this one.

They were only mostly d..."
As a matter of fact, your previous comment made me think of that very book and I just finished re-reading it last night! Absolutely love that book... makes me want to re-watch the movie! Of course, I'm always up for re-watching the movie, so just about anything can trigger that desire. ;)


Yes! I agree with that one, I found the book off-putting but the film charming. And though I love Jane Austen, Sense and Sensibility as created by Emma Thompson was more enjoyable than the book. Another is The Joy Luck Club, where I had trouble keeping the characters straight in the book, but not in the film.



I thought that was a very good production, too, John.


If you roll over the dots on the charts you can see the names of the various books. SO COOL!
Geek away!
https://public.tableau.com/en-us/s/ga...
Books mentioned in this topic
Magpie Murders (other topics)Magpie Murders (other topics)
Magpie Murders (other topics)
Big Fish (other topics)
The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Diana Gabaldon (other topics)George Orwell (other topics)
Elmore Leonard (other topics)
Philip K. Dick (other topics)
It's really obvious that they're talking around certain subjects, and I figured out the twist to the ending in the first chapter. Perhaps I wouldn't have picked up on it, if I hadn't read certain other classics, but still... It's never a good thing when you can figure out the books secrets in Chapter One!
I would suspect that using POV camera angles and such would be a lot less obvious (and more spooky) than just talking around the issue like the book does.