Short Story Connect discussion
GENERAL DISCUSSIONS
>
Why does the short story get the cold shoulder and the novel get the red carpet treatment?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Alisha ‘Priti’
(new)
Dec 30, 2015 02:39AM

reply
|
flag


So here we are, encouraging each other and I love reading short stories and always will. Do share your link :)

I find that if you read a short story, you need to commit to it fully from the get-go, and stay with it to its end. For example, I rarely stop in the middle of one. You have to be able to keep salient details in your mind as every word can be important, plot points can turn on a nuance.
With a good short story, the author needs to hook the reader quickly, keep them engaged and then finish with a flourish. As we all know, even with the best of novels there can be some down-time, so to speak, and then it picks up again. With a short story the author and the reader don't have that luxury.
I make it a point to read numerous short story collections each year, and I subscribe to The New Yorker magazine. Over the years I have truly come to enjoy and appreciate short story fiction. But it was a learned habit, and not something I started out with.
Interesting topic!



There is a brilliant short story called "The Japanese Wife" which was made into a film. It has stayed with me till today like many a novel I have read.

In contrast, Edith Wharton, is an unqualified master. She is a realist and who is all about feelings and responses, and she can punch you in the gut with the best of them. I re-read her short story collections almost every year!
John O'Hara, another of my American favorites, is dialog-driven. Dialog-driven plots and stories can be hard for some people to read as it demands every jot of attention you can muster. But there is such beauty, and reward, in getting in the rhythm of the dialog and following along as though one is sitting right there and sharing in the conversation with the plot's protagonists. As I recall, O'Hara holds the record for the most short stories published by The New Yorker magazine of any author.
Another American short story author I love is Ron Rash. He writes about the people and natural landscapes of Appalachia, both historical and modern. Man, it is some good stuff, gut-wrenching, painful, funny, loving, but mostly damn lyrical.
One of my favorite British Victorian short story authors is Thomas Hardy. He can turn a tale too. He tends to incorporate local folklore, and landscapes of southwestern Britain; and generally involves the relationships between men and women that go awry.
I could go on and on...


Thanks, ever so much, Alisha, for the recommendations. I can remember years, and years ago, my mother reading Tagore. I shall look up his work. I am always looking to expand my horizons beyond the tried and true in the English language. Have a wonderful New Year, Alisha!

In response to your initial post - is it because the traditional publishing industry finds it difficult to make money out of short stories compared to novels and so typically more hype and buzz surrounds the launch of novels ?
Earlier this year I attended the annual San Francisco Writers Conference, having just released my debut short story collection as a Kindle edition.
Just one out of fourteen literary agents present at the conference that I spoke to claimed to be interested in the short story format but yet all agreed that was no reason not to launch them via the self-publishing route.
So, as with so much else in this world, money, not readers often dictates what is published.
Long live the short story format !


@KP and S... More power to all of us. Let's keep writing and reading.



Wow, that's a really poetic way to put it.

Haha, thankyou, its good to know the poet in me is still alive to leave traces of her here and there!


Haha, yes :)

The thing is they are rather different art forms. I write both and they take very different disciplines and I get different things from writing each. I write the shortest form of short story, that of flash fiction, 1000 words or less. Having now published 5 collections of Flash, I find it utterly liberating because you simply don't have time to establish the scene and the character(s), so have to find a different way of presenting your work. I've done stories consisting of names, bingo call rhymes, endings only, stories with words that mutate and change throughout its length etc. There are no limits. What I don't find so interesting are short stories that are basically novels lite; the same approach as a novel, only with lots of stuff left out in the assumption that this creates ambiguity. It doesn't. Celebrate the form by using it in different, interesting ways from the novel.



I have a story in my first collection made up of 100 single word sentences, each beginning with the letter C!
I agree with you, it definitely makes you think differently as a writer.



I have a story in my first collection made up of 100 single word sentences, each beginning with the l..."
Marc wrote: "My latest one is this

I have a story in my first collection made up of 100 single word sentences, each beginning with the l..."
That would have been quite challenging. I will take a look at it soon :)

My book has twists in each story and I know I have to grab the reader's attention because I do not have room for details. Either genre throws its own challenge. My novel is coming out in paperback this year. As a writer of both genres, I connect with my characters differently but equally intensely. So should the reader hopefully :)
Books mentioned in this topic
Extra-Curricular (other topics)Extra-Curricular (other topics)