Mock Newbery 2026 discussion
Book of the Month - 2016
>
December Reads - 2016
date
newest »


While reading this book, I had it pegged as an easy 5 starred book. I really enjoyed it and found it creative. However, I was a bit disappointed in the end. The author took a lot of time detailing the "fiction" story of the Marvels, letting the reader learn about Joseph and him exploring his efforts in finding the truth behind his family's history/Marvels history, but then I felt that Albert's sudden love for his nephew in the end and the quick ending to wrap up the story was rushed--I know this sounds weird given that it is a pretty thick book. However, this quick ending moved the book from a 5-starred book to a 4-starred book for this. I don't think this book is a contender because the art work at the ending tells the rest of the story. The end of the story is not narrative and relies on the pictures to tell the conclusion. However, the committee might overlook this???

Actually, I was a little disappointed in this book. I guess I am supposed to really like it because of the transgender topic it covers and I so much wanted to like this book. I did like how the author did write what was going on in the little boy's/girl's "George's) mind; however, I really didn't care for the plot/storyline, and the writing really wasn't that great. So although the topic was admirable, I thought the book was just okay. This is not a Newbery worthy to me.

It has been actually several days since I have read this book, and I find myself thinking about this book. Joan/Julie cracked me up. As a 47 year old, I was getting a little irritated by the protagonist's diary entries with one day stating: "Oh, this is the most wonderful day. . ." and then the next diary entry would state the opposite, "Oh, I am so horrible and in so much trouble. The worst has happened. . ." But then I had to remember--the girl is 14 and has taken on a lot of responsibilities and yes, I was once a silly girl when I was young when I had no responsibilities and could think about boys all day long. When I was reading this book, I could not put it down. When I stopped reading, I couldn't wait to read the book again. I remember really liking Schlitz's book Splendor and Glooms, but this book beats that. Loved the book after I finished it and I still love the book several days later when thinking about it every once in a while. This is the type of book that makes it hard to go on and just pick up another book to read because your mind just keeps on lingering back on the silly Joan/Julie. Great story and great ending. To me, this is a good choice for a Newbery nod and hope it is honored with some kind of recognition.
Out of all the 2015 books I read this year, my favorite is Full Cicada Moon for Newbery. If you haven't read it, I recommend it.


Actually, I was a little disappointed in this book. I guess I am supposed to really like it because of the transgender topic it covers and I so much wanted to like this book. I did..."
I couldn't agree more. It just did not resonate with me at all. It felt very contrived. I'm looking forward to reading Gracefully Grayson which deals with the same topic.

Actually, I was a little disappointed in this book. I guess I am supposed to really like it because of the transgender topic it covers and I so much wanted to like this book. I did..."
This was my reaction as well.




Since the characters are 10 years old, it does seems appropriate that they focus on superficial gender differences, such as wearing make-up or pretty dresses. However, I do agree with the mother that age 10 is very young to be making a life-long determination about gender identity or sexual preference.
As a librarian, I was disappointed in the author's reliance on the credibility of the Internet for research on such a complex subject. But that only reinforces the need for this and other books. I consider George a strong contender for the Newbery.

Of course, I loved The Marvels, but I just don't know what the committee will do with it. I felt the same way about Hugo, and although I was happy to see it get some recognition, I was really crossing my fingers for a Newbery that year. Perhaps El Deafo paved the way to let a book like this win a Newbery instead.
As for George, I feel the same as many others, in that I had high hopes for the book, appreciated the attempt to tackle a difficult subject, but was ultimately disappointed in the writing. Mostly, the book felt rushed to me, as if some agents and editors just pushed it through to get it out there. It's too bad, because it is a missed opportunity. Hopefully someone will be able to create a really beautiful book incorporating this issue.

Just to say as someone who was on the Newbery Committee the year of HUGO, I don't think it is about paving the way as much as the book itself. With HUGO the images were critical to an appreciation of the story, it seemed to me. I couldn't get my mind around the criteria in thinking about "text" as not being just words.
That was't so much the case with EL DEAFO (I wrote the following blog post to prove that and like to think it may have helped last year's Committee: https://medinger.wordpress.com/2015/0...)
The struggle for me with THE MARVELS is that the images are key it seems to me to the story. I still have an old-fashioned sense of text as words and am, I guess, a bit rule-bound in terms of the criteria. However, someone over at the Heavy Medal Blog has a Mock Newbery group of kids who seem to feel that it has a shot. (http://blogs.slj.com/heavymedal/2015/...)
I definitely have MARVELS on my Newbery goodreads list and would love to be proved wrong:)



With Joan, Schlitz presents the impetuousness of an adolescent, reaching out for one new experience after another, confident that she knows what she's about. Each experience extends Joan’s understanding of her expanding world, up to and including offering herself to the young man of her dreams. (Sorry, this ain’t a typical Newbery literary focus.) Fortunately, Joan possesses a resilient temperament, so when she has clearly misunderstood a situation, she adapts and immediately heads off on another tangent. Joan’s exuberance (and volatility) makes for entertaining reading.
Almost as important to the novel as Schlitz’s vibrant delineation of character is her attention to the details of the book’s setting in early-20th-century Baltimore. Her decision to ground the story in the ins-and-outs of Jewish and Catholic culture was unusual and compelling. (Very few books for young readers these days treat religion as a significant but normal aspect of everyday life.)
I hope this memorable book gets some award recognition, but I would expect it to be a Printz not a Newbery.


What are your thoughts on Marvels being considered by the actual Newbery committee?

I think that if Flora and Ulysses: The Illuminated Adventures can win, then so can Marvels. It seems to me that the "language" stipulation of the Newbery criteria has been bent to include visual language.
That being said, I felt that the prose portion of Marvels didn't live up to the visual portions. It gave the book an uneven feel.


It's a late release (Sept). Read it. You and your kids will love it.

Deborah,
I loved FCM as well. I agree the time period was very interesting for a mixed race family in small town Vermont. Yes, each of the characters stood out in a different ways and went through great character development. FCM will be wonderful for upper grade lit study groups. It needs to be added to my "gotta get it" list...always so long!
Books mentioned in this topic
Flora & Ulysses: The Illuminated Adventures (other topics)The Marvels (other topics)
Melissa (other topics)
The Hired Girl (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Brian Selznick (other topics)Alex Gino (other topics)
Laura Amy Schlitz (other topics)
All three are very different books. What did you think of them?