SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
SciFi and Fantasy Book Challenge
>
2016 Group Bookshelf Reading Calendar/Planning

We do have consistent participators as well as people who don't. I don't think the google doc we're using tells us who voted for what.
I would want to talk to Edwin to get his opinion but ideas like those above are welcome. We could also maybe do voting and scheduling twice per year? Participation really does seem to lag more later in the year.
I actually can't figure out what purpose voting and not participating serves?



I start the year by checking the availability and wait list for all of the books and if the wait is long I will add it to my hold list. If it comes in early, I just try to make good notes to participate in the discussion later in the year. For example, I have had a book on hold since April, but there are still 6 people ahead of me (not for this group).
Regardless, I appreciate the effort you and Edwin put in and I will participate as much as I can either way. :)

Sarah Anne wrote: "True :) Chris, do you think voting twice per year would help with what you mentioned about less participation as the year goes on?"
I’d like to add my thoughts too... For me it was kind of hard because almost all the books I voted for ended up being at the beginning of the year. Also, if I really like a book, I usually feel compelled to read the whole series and because we have a lot of series on our shelves these are a lot of books and so, I just barely made it this year.
For that reason I’d find it helpful, if we could vote twice a year.

Just for comparison, in another group, the moderator specifically mention that the one who proposed the winning book must lead the discussion and the voters should consider whether they REALLY want to participate on the threads. No sanction on nominator/voters-cum-lurkers though, just relying on good faith.


This is one of those issues that often comes up in small groups. I see it all over the place and it's always the groups that have something like 25 people voting.
Given the amount of hair I tore out last year, I admit I would like lots and lots of participation on every single read. :) But I do know that sometimes having a schedule can keep me on track.
Of course, sometimes there just isn't much to say about a book. I've found myself occasionally not participating just because of that.

Also, perhaps we shouldn't schedule two books every month. Book length makes a huge difference. One of the longer books can take more time than two of the shorter ones put together.

"Mistborn: The Final Empire" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"Mistborn: The Final Empire" Final Thoughts *Spoilers*
It looks like when Michael did a read for this in 2014 he opened threads for each Part, 1-4. Let me know if you guys want that.

I really did have good intentions, but didn’t read it:
*The overly ambitious: “my eyes are bigger than my stomach…….”
*The dreamer: “gosh, all these books are so great..….”
*The obsessive organizer: “maybe a schedule will keep me on track…….”
*The disorganized: “hmmm, did I vote for that?........”
*The unfortunate: “dang, I can’t afford that and am still on this stupid wait list at the library…..”
OK, I read it but didn’t comment:
*The shy: “boy, everybody else seems so smart……”
*The busy: “great book, gotta go now……”
*Nothing to add: “wow, that's just what I was about to say…….”
Yup, I read it and commented:
*The loquacious: “hi, my name is Sarah……”

*The loquacious: “hi, my name is Sarah……
Haha!!! Oh man, that totally made me laugh!

I really did have good intentions, but didn’t read it:
*The overly ambitious: “my eyes are bigger than my stomach…….”
*The dreamers: “gosh, all these books are so gre..."
Fantastic, Edwin!

So anyways all that stuff in discussion about characters and how they related to this and that and those deep thoughts about the book and even author kinda scare me. Mostly because I think I need to produce something similar in order to bring something in to the discussion. Instead of the usual I didn't like this book or I liked this book.


I flee in annoyance. Clearly one of the most over-used phrases on this website.

But yeah, enough with the tropes already.

I really did have good intentions, but didn’t read it:
*The overly ambitious: “my eyes are bigger than my stomach…….”
*The dreamer: “gosh, all these books are so grea..."
Perfect! Somebody should make an illustration for these.
I am all of these. Except that in 'the unfortunate' part, usually it's when no Kindle version available for me to purchase (usually takes months to order via mail)

To me, it is not necessarily a judgement of good or bad, because there are oft used plot devices throughout literary history that are effective. However, the term has a bit of a pejorative* connotation** these days because so many authors seem to be guilty of bundling together a mass of tropes, rather than crafting a quality plot. I could go on a tangent to describe why I believe it to be the case, but that is way off topic.
So, I am going to apologize in advance for continuing to annoy you guys by using the word trope. For me, it is just much easier to type, "the author used this trope to good (or bad) purpose." versus, "the author used this commonly recurring literary device or motif to bad (or good) purpose."




Agreed, though sometimes a derivative is new to me so it seems fresh. And also, a well worn trope can still get five stars out of me if it's well done and interesting.

I thought so, too. I am so sad that no one has seconded it yet for the UF read. (shameless plug for my nominee)

On to Little Big....
p.s. Since Valerie has rated Sevenes 5 stars I can clearly not trust any of her future opinions so no way am I seconding Blackbirds ;)


Lately, it appears that Sarah and I have been agreeing more. Maybe we can rotate who is the odd man out? Tag! Hank's it! Mwuhaha!
By the way, enjoy Little, Big. *smirk*


I've been feeling guilty because I haven't been able to participate like I wanted to...reasons for me include many of the already stated:
-the unfortunate (unable to attain books due to wait lists/money)
-multiple books at one time
-books I voted for happening to occur when life happened
-life happening (I moved to another country...turns out that takes a lot of time. Good news: now that I'm here I have time to read!)
Also, I don't typically participate in the non-spoiler threads, because sometimes spoilers are inadvertent. I usually read them once I've finished the book, though.

The Lies of Locke Lamora
"The Lies of Locke Lamora" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"The Lies of Locke Lamora" What did you think *Spoilers*?
To Say Nothing of the Dog
"To Say Nothing of the Dog" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"To Say Nothing of the Dog" Finished Reading *Spoilers*

Wild Seed
"Wild Seed" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"Wild Seed" Between the beginning and the end *marked spoilers*
I have no idea why it says "marked spoilers" but it's as close as they have to a final thoughts thread.
Dune
"Dune" First Impressions
"Dune" Finished (possible spoiler alert)
Sarah Anne wrote: "Here are our Oct threads! I'm excited about reading Wild Seed.
Wild Seed
"Wild Seed" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"Wild Seed" Between the beginning and the end *marked spoilers*
I..."
I'm a little nervous about Wild Seed. It seems kind of depressing...but then Amazon had to put it on sale, so I didn't have an excuse to not get it.
Wild Seed
"Wild Seed" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"Wild Seed" Between the beginning and the end *marked spoilers*
I..."
I'm a little nervous about Wild Seed. It seems kind of depressing...but then Amazon had to put it on sale, so I didn't have an excuse to not get it.

- This bookshelf reading idea actually goes hand in hand with the Read All the Books! challenge, which is a challenge for the full year.
- Doing the whole schedule all at once allows us to schedule the highest ranked with the lowest ranked, which makes for fewer conflicts for people who only read one per month.
- This also gives us the most flexibility for making sure that we don't end up with two high page count books per month.
- It keeps us from having to schedule the same book twice because it's voted in twice.
At Edwin's suggestion, I have started to add in what we're reading into the monthly announcement of what's going on in the group. Hopefully this way we can stir up some participation. I'll make a note next month to include the fact that we'll be voting soon.
This year we're trying something new with the voting. We're going to use a link to a google doc that works as a survey and will allow the voters to choose as many options as they like. Voters will also be able to edit their response. This is new for Edwin and I both but it does appear that it will work well. Books will be listed in alphabetical order and it will include book title, author, and page count. I stopped shy of the research involved in adding the audiobook length as well.
Edwin and I are very glad that we won't be at risk of losing our sanity when trying to track everything. Hopefully this will work as well as we hope!
I'll post the voting link on Nov 15th.
Sarah Anne wrote: "Voting for the 2017 books will begin on Nov 15th. Edwin and I have decided to do the whole year at once again for a couple of reasons.
- This bookshelf reading idea actually goes hand in hand with..."
Thanks for all the work you put in. Between the BOTM and the group re-reads, there is always a book I want to read.
- This bookshelf reading idea actually goes hand in hand with..."
Thanks for all the work you put in. Between the BOTM and the group re-reads, there is always a book I want to read.

They did that at my request. I knew you were wavering ;)
Sarah Anne wrote: "Melanie wrote: "I'm a little nervous about Wild Seed. It seems kind of depressing...but then Amazon had to put it on sale, so I didn't have an excuse to not get it. *..."
They did that at my reque..."
You really are all-powerful!
They did that at my reque..."
You really are all-powerful!


It's no problem :) The nice thing about this google doc is that I'll just have to add the new books in every year and clear the votes. It's going to make things much easier over the years.


"Leviathan Wakes" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"Leviathan Wakes" Finished Reading *Spoilers*

The Quantum Thief
"The Quantum Thief" Discussion *No Spoilers*
"The Quantum Thief" Final Thoughts *Spoilers*
The Warded Man
"The Warded Man" First Impressions *No Spoilers*
"The Warded Man" Final Thoughts *Spoilers*
Books mentioned in this topic
Caliban’s War (other topics)Leviathan Wakes (other topics)
Wild Seed (other topics)
Wild Seed (other topics)
Royal Assassin (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)Scott Lynch (other topics)
Guy Gavriel Kay (other topics)
Hugh Howey (other topics)
Iain M. Banks (other topics)
More...
I admit, I missed the read for one of mine. I'd totally understand if my vote was given lower value because of it.