A Child Called "It"
discussion
I know I'm not the only one.
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kristen
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 27, 2014 01:33PM

reply
|
flag


they probs felt guilty for what happened so they said it didnt. if you want to make sure it was true foster kids leave a paper trail.

He wrote this story from the memories of his adolescent mind, and we all know when we were younger we took everything worse than it was, so it could just be his memory, he just might have to make the book more heart yanking, or this story is actually 100% truthful in the words. Only David Pelzer and his mother will know the full extent of the abuse he endured.

In the story Pelzer's mother did a lot of the abuse when no one was looking. Like when she made him eat the feces out of a diaper, everyone else was outside and not paying attention. So it's fully possible that his brother doesn't believe a lot of this because he never saw it happened or noticed much abuse when living in the house hold.
Steven wrote: "Does anyone else feel that David Pelzer Might have stretched the truth when writing this book? I am not going to take a leap of faith and say that he was completely lying, but I did get the impress..."
Yes, I think he probably was "stretching the truth". But who cares? I wish he'd stretched the truth a lot more, because then it might have actually been an interesting book (rather than the lifeless, boring turd it is).
Yes, I think he probably was "stretching the truth". But who cares? I wish he'd stretched the truth a lot more, because then it might have actually been an interesting book (rather than the lifeless, boring turd it is).

Exactly.




Steven wrote: "Does anyone else feel that David Pelzer Might have stretched the truth when writing this book? I am not going to take a leap of faith and say that he was completely lying, but I did get the impress..."

Sometimes you try to bury what you went through in tightly sealed boxes, but I don't believe you ever forget what it felt like when you eventually talk about it, no matter how young you were.
I know of people that have been abused who now abuse their own children. Others often break down at some stage in their life because the lids of their sealed boxes start opening.
You can have a serious break down and eventually get the help you need, commit suicide as a few people I know have done because they could never get over it, or you could live in depression your entire life because of it.
Abused people don't speak about it and nor do their siblings, especially if it's only one or two children that were abused in the family. The ones that are not abused often try to protect their parents because it is an embarrassment for the world to know about it.
Some only have the courage to write about it after their death of their parents.
I agree with Gabriella. It is so common, not only between parents and children but between adult couples as well.
Abused people don't talk about it unless for some reason you tell them about your own abuse.
I am glad he had the courage to write about it and use his real name. I hope he has worked through it with professionals and is living his life feeling worthy of being here.

Gabriella I have no idea how my pic landed on your comment. I can't seem to remove it. Can you? All I did was upload my pic on my profile. So sorry about that.

Good point!


that's true


As he does say his brothers did not go through the same situations as he did. They were lucky. Why would the brother want to agree with the story and be judged as is his mother.

I dont think he was "Stretching the truth" because there were some pictures online of some scars and bruises and one of his brothers still remembers what his mother did to him


http://291888.blogspot.com/
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic