Writers and Readers discussion
Writers Corner
>
Does Age Matter?
date
newest »



Mental capacity, attitude, confidence, knowledge, skill-set, capability and ability are the factors that determine a person's achievement limitations.
My personal life experiences have occasionally brought me into contact with 16 year-old adults and 60 year-old adolescents - humble genuises and incompetent braggarts.
In other words, Ken; go for it!
One of my favorite quotes:
"The past may dictate who we are, but we get to determine what we become." (Steven Spielberg)

For every young success story (S.E. Hinton was only 17 and Christopher Paolini was only 15) there is someone who was first published much older. Laura Ingalls Wilder was in her 60's and Richard Adams was in his 50's.
A good story is a good story no matter how old you are.

My husband (who at nearly 78 still skis and plays racquetball) is fond of saying, "Keep riding the wave until it hits the shore!" Good attitude for writers, too.
Good comment, Laurel. Actually, I precede the boomers by a couple of months, but I was part of the wave anyway. I'm not bothered by my writing skill at my age, because I think you're right; we can write good characters of all ages (and I have a close friend who's 95, so I'm familiar with the previous gen, too). I was wondering more about how others accepted new work from little-known older writers.
It's funny that one of the characters in the book I'm currently working on is a teenage boy, and when I'm writing that character, and get into it, I can remember the muddled thought processes I had at that age, the way of thinking, the attitude, and the hormones. It all comes back as if it were yesterday. Culture also plays a part, and if I haven't lived the culture I'm writing about, most likely I've read about it--and in my case, with Science Fiction, I can make it up.
It's funny that one of the characters in the book I'm currently working on is a teenage boy, and when I'm writing that character, and get into it, I can remember the muddled thought processes I had at that age, the way of thinking, the attitude, and the hormones. It all comes back as if it were yesterday. Culture also plays a part, and if I haven't lived the culture I'm writing about, most likely I've read about it--and in my case, with Science Fiction, I can make it up.


I'd let the author photo do the talking and not worry too much about broadcasting your age.

I agree. I have no idea how old authors are when I read a book. I do look writers up when reading for the lit mag if I suspect I am reading a submission by a very young author who thinks spell-check and grammar rules are a waste of time. :)

Laurel wrote: "While we're on the subject of age, what about novels with primarily older characters? I don't find many mysteries, for example, with primarily older characters. Some years ago I read a comment by a..."
The main character in my current novel is over a 100 years old when the story starts. Of course, in Science Fiction there's this rejuvenation deal...
The main character in my current novel is over a 100 years old when the story starts. Of course, in Science Fiction there's this rejuvenation deal...
Emphasize your experience rather than your age. Saying I spent 21 years in the CIA helps me sell my books. Saying I'm a 56-year-old woman definitely would not.

I posted this question on another website, and it got a lot of response and over 600 views, so it might be a relevant question to a lot of people.
About 20 years..." Hi Ken. You made me smile, that's because I'm older than you, and have three books on Amazon. Sometimes I think we need to grow older in order to have something of significance to say. I believe it's still true that with age comes wisdom. Also, with such high-tech advantages we have today I think it helps to compensate for our aging. I wrote a poem titled "Old People," which I might post.



I published my first book at the humble little age of 12. It was the best and worst decision of my life (I'm near 15 now), and not because I was 12, but because I had little experience in writing (I'd only been writing for about 4 years at the time, and I had yet to discover some of my greatest mentors such as Stephen King) and I didn't know the consequences that would have come with me not doing the proper work to make the book good; now, anyone who reads it either a) dosen't get beyond the first 100 pages or b) finishes it and says 'meh' plus it's been described as a great book for "Boys who like a good action packed thriller," per the fact it was written b a boy who had been in contact with mostly action movies and the books of Rick Riordan and to some extent was tryi to recreate both of them. At the time, I think that it would have been a bad idea to mention my age, and even then, I think it may have been obvious. But even so, I don't think age really matters when writing, it's the words that count. I'm sure someone has already mentioned him, but Cormac McCarthy is friggin' 81 (and has a little boy too!) and he's still writing some excellent fiction that's won him the Pulitzer and eventually, and possibly the Nobel Prize for Literature; his books adapted into award winning films and his books praised endlessly by this reviewer and that; and he rarely does interviews, yet the mention of his name could well cause a frenzy. Sometimes, your words will speak a lot louder than your stature: I think that, when I wrote my first book, that there was some kind of misconception between writing and the person behind it: "Aw shoot, I'm only a little squirt my writing ain't never gonna be no better than trash; I'll never be good as Stephen K(a)ing, not ever-ever-ever! Not until I get old as em' at least," but that's not true: had I known a little more about writing at the time, and had I refined my skill a bit more, maybe the book would have come out better; in recent times, big things ahev changed, I'd say my writing style and my literary taste has grown tremendously and I've written some pretty good works, and I've been able to see my growth. But, the point is, as I said before, the words will speak louder than your stature.

Some writers, regardless of age, refuse to expend the time and energy required to learn and develop the technical writing and narration skills needed to create a literary work worthy of the title.
As with any product, a book can be only as good as the knowledge, skills, and work ethic of its creator. The age of the author has very little bearing on the quality of his/her work.


Marianne Perry
Author of The Inheritance
Writing inspired by genealogical research to solve family mysteries.
http://www.marianneperry.ca



As a matter of fact, it doesn't seem to. A year after getting back into writing, I just released a new novel and it's doing very well.

A poster near the beginning, Laurel perhaps, mentioned that older people have the experience of having lived through different ages so I don't think you need to worry. I'm more inclined to be wary of a young writer than an old one. This is one occupation where age is probably helpful.
I think it's not a good idea as a writer to have a pic that was taken 20 years ago or so (mine's coming up for four years old) and that is as much as I'm prepared to say - my actual age is irrelevant, you can see I'm old enough to have lived!
I posted this question on another website, and it got a lot of response and over 600 views, so it might be a relevant question to a lot of people.
About 20 years ago, after being in the game for 18 years, I stopped writing. I had published some stories in a few limited-circulation magazines, but getting published was still an uphill battle, and I was burned out from trying. Then, last year, I bought a Kindle. I saw all those books on display, and saw how easy getting published was nowadays, and I thought, "I can do that." So now I have a novel and two short-story collections listed, and I'm working on another novel. Trouble is, I'm old. I'm retired, on Social Security and Medicare, and in less than two years I'll hit the big (and I mean big) seven oh. I'm not yet senile (but what senile person knows he's senile?), and after years of composing on a typewriter in the "old days," I've discovered that my writing method has changed with the advent of computers. However, I still seem to write as well as ever, probably better, and I've become a much, much better editor of my own work, which is the key to writing well. I don't expect to start any long, involved series, but I'm healthy and I might write a sequel or two. My question is: Can you be too old to be accepted as a "new" writer? Should you reveal your age at all?--or is that a disadvantage in selling your work these days? Would love opinions.