All About Books discussion

This topic is about
The Moonstone
Readalongs
>
The Moonstone by Wilkie Collins (Pink & Myst, others welcome to join)
date
newest »




That style of multiple points of view is one Collins used a lot -- in fact, I think of that as a trademark of his style though he did write books which didn't have that feature.

I have a *very* small hope of getting anything read for a day or 2 as I've got a day trip planned tomorrow and need to get dishes done tonight (10pm currently).
I've got a mini calendar on a piece of paper taped in my kindle case to track my progress which I found helps one get through certain books in a more timely fashion. Even though the Moonstone isn't tedious, I want to make sure I stay on track as I've got a few books going on at the same time.

Myst, you're definitely further ahead than me, so you can take a breather while I catch up. Does your kindle edition have the same chapter breakdowns, after the first three chapters there are eight different narratives, then an epilogue. Have you reached the narratives yet? I'm still on the second chapter I mentioned above, but it's nearly 200 pages and by far the longest chapter of the book.
Leslie wrote: "Pink wrote: "Chris, no problem, join in whenever you get time. So far I'm enjoying the writing and I'm really intrigued by how the story is constructed from multiple points of view. Think this migh..."
I love this book, also because of that. Collins used it a lot, but I thinkbit was quite common in Victorian literature: think of Dracula. It was a way to say that truth was not one, but coukd have multiple aspect...
I love this book, also because of that. Collins used it a lot, but I thinkbit was quite common in Victorian literature: think of Dracula. It was a way to say that truth was not one, but coukd have multiple aspect...

I'm trying to do a daily quota while I work on other books. Right now I'm about to read:
Blood Debt
Blood Bank
Undead and Unfinished
Undead and Undermined
Dragon Harper
I really hope to get 3-4 of those done this week.

Surprisingly I haven't been reading any other books alongside this yet. It looks like you have lots of others on the go!

I think I'm more used to reading multiple narratives in epistolary novels, but don't come across it very often in other books. I know it was more of a device in Victorian literature though.
Laura, I'm interested to know if you have a preference for The Woman in White or The Moonstone? At the moment this one might just have the edge, though I've got quite a long way to go yet.
Pink wrote: "LauraT wrote: "I love this book, also because of that. Collins used it a lot, but I thinkbit was quite common in Victorian literature: think of Dracula. It was a way to say that truth was not one, ..."
I love them both; I definitly think they're Colin's best works. Probably I slightly prefere The Woman in White, but only slightly!!!!
I love them both; I definitly think they're Colin's best works. Probably I slightly prefere The Woman in White, but only slightly!!!!


Today is a rainy day so a project I need/want to work on isn't really do-able as I need better light, so I may just read all day.

There's theories, but I doubt we'll know much for sure for awhile yet.


I've got 8ish other books to try and finish this month (I had time with only 5 scheduled before 3 books had their holds come in early and another was acquired by the library quicker than other PNR books have this year when the catalog stated 'on order'...those books were 'on order' for 3-6 weeks!)
So I'll probably be juggling books for the rest of the month.
I'm just glad I finished DQ before I had a zillion and 8 holds come in early.
I've just finished Basil and about to start The Law and the Lady by Collins. The first is a sort of Mystery - his first book, not as good as the one you're reading. The second I don't know; I'll tell you as soon as I'm inside it!
Are you at the quicksands already?
Are you at the quicksands already?
I've read it is a mystery as well. At the moment is nice: I like his way of unravelling things bits by bits ...

Onto Mr Bruff, the solicitor's narrative now, which is quite a bit shorter at 23 pages.
One of things I liked best was that the narrating voices were so different from each other and sometimes so whimsical! No so trustfully narrators at all -even if in the end the story comes out all right!

And then she didn't get the hint when the tracts were returned to her, so she had to go and push them on the recipients again!
And what little we heard of the contents of those tracts...ugh, talk about living in the 1400's.
I didn't meet my quota last night. So I'm falling behind slightly, but I'm further ahead of you. I'm on the heir who was in the far east just reading the letter that his father had died. 61% or something.

We also get more insight into Rosanna and Rachel.

Yes I like the different narrators too, it's good to find out the story in this way and also see how everyone has their own motives and story that they want to tell.
Myst, I'm not surprised you couldn't stand Miss Clack. I thought she was a fabulously annoying character, very well written and I found her religious antics hilarious.
I still haven't read about Mr Bruff yet, but will try to read that today, then I'll be onto Franklin Blake's narrative. Glad to know we'll be finding out more about Rosanna and Rachel again.


Books mentioned in this topic
Basil (other topics)The Law and the Lady (other topics)
The Woman in White (other topics)
Blood Debt (other topics)
Blood Bank (other topics)
More...
Myst, I know you're already further ahead, whereabouts in the story are you?