Beta Reader Group discussion
Writing Advice & Discussion
>
Beta Reader Contracts

I don't know plagiarism law so I can't speak on that aspect.
I could possibly see this in a publishing environment, maybe a "test market" scenario.
In the end it's whatever makes you comfortable and I'm sure there are betas that would oblige. I would probably shy away ad a beta, but I don't sign anything that could potentially affect me negatively without a lawyer.


Beta readers are not for reviewing, just make sure it is clear before you send it to them.
I've never had a beta sign anything. It made me nervous at first, to send out something so raw. It is scary to trust people you've never met with your baby. But I've had wonderful experiences, and I hope they continue.
If a beta chose to use their comments on an unfinished book as a review, I would be surprised, but I'd say it's their right. However, I think it would be poor form for someone to do so without asking for a review copy once it's finished. Just like it would be poor form for an author to ask a beta, in addition to what they've already done, to write a review.
If a beta chose to use their comments on an unfinished book as a review, I would be surprised, but I'd say it's their right. However, I think it would be poor form for someone to do so without asking for a review copy once it's finished. Just like it would be poor form for an author to ask a beta, in addition to what they've already done, to write a review.
I have never signed a contract for beta reading, but I would also assume that a beta would respect confidentiality, not pass a beta book on and I don't think they should be writing a public review either, certainly not on the beta version.
If an author has concerns on these points, however, they should by all means seek confirmation from the beta before proceeding.
I don't tend to delete beta files, as often an author will ask further questions, and storage is not an issue.
If an author has concerns on these points, however, they should by all means seek confirmation from the beta before proceeding.
I don't tend to delete beta files, as often an author will ask further questions, and storage is not an issue.

I don't add anyone else's book to the site unless it's an already published book that for some reason isn't on the site.

I'm pretty new to beta reading. I've never been asked to sign anything, but I would never pass a book along or write a review based on a beta read. I would be OK with signing a simple confidentiality agreement. I actually review those as part of my job, so I'm familiar with the language. My signing it would depend on what language was included.
I did make the mistake of adding a book (just the title of the book and the author/illustrator name - no synopsis or anything). I thought the entry would be private to me. I was horrified when I went to the author's Goodreads page and saw it posted there. I immediately emailed him and told him what happened. He was very nice and told me not to worry about it. I had already contacted a Goodread's librarian about deleting the post, but ended up leaving it since it was OK with the author (such a nice man!). I only added it to keep track of what I am beta reading, reviewing, and reading for the year. I'll never make that mistake again, though!
I did make the mistake of adding a book (just the title of the book and the author/illustrator name - no synopsis or anything). I thought the entry would be private to me. I was horrified when I went to the author's Goodreads page and saw it posted there. I immediately emailed him and told him what happened. He was very nice and told me not to worry about it. I had already contacted a Goodread's librarian about deleting the post, but ended up leaving it since it was OK with the author (such a nice man!). I only added it to keep track of what I am beta reading, reviewing, and reading for the year. I'll never make that mistake again, though!
I have used beta readers for my work and also beta read for people. I have never asked, or been asked to sign anything. Personally I would walk away if someone asked me to sign something (I don't want to feel like I need a lawyer when I'm taking time out of my own busy life to help someone).
You do take a chance giving someone your work, but there are things you can do.
Check the person you are giving your work to, have they beta read before.
You can ask for references.
Keep all email contact in a file; this is your proof that you sent them your work.
If you are not comfortable, or do not trust someone reading your work then you should pay people to do it professionally, that’s my opinion anyway.
Hope this helps.
You do take a chance giving someone your work, but there are things you can do.
Check the person you are giving your work to, have they beta read before.
You can ask for references.
Keep all email contact in a file; this is your proof that you sent them your work.
If you are not comfortable, or do not trust someone reading your work then you should pay people to do it professionally, that’s my opinion anyway.
Hope this helps.



It does seem that everyone on both sides is pretty much in agreement regarding contracts in such a situation.

No, I don't ask them to sign contracts etc, if they cant be trusted , the c..."
Registering @ ISBN free? I have done it already...

According to me, it is primarily a matter of trust. You may take every conceivable precaution, but not that solitary step to check out on the 'reader' and his true intentions. If the reader who approaches you, is registered with a website like GoodReads, spend some time scrutinising his profile. I am sure that will be worth much more than harbouring other apprehensions!
Having said that, let me add: The question that bothers a reader like me is a writer's willingness to accept objective criticisms. There have been occasions, when I felt that the hours I spent in reading a book, and the efforts I took in conveying my findings have all been sheer waste!
I agree with you on a writer's acceptance of objective criticism. I try very hard to give any criticism in as positive a light as possible. It makes me feel horrible to have to say anything negative, but if there is something negative that I feel, isn't the point of a beta reader to let an author know what those things are?
I had one author who never responded to the email I returned with my comments. She never even acknowledged receiving my email, and I know she did bc I replied to the email she originally sent me. I spent hours reading her book and a couple of hours putting my comments together to be as nice as possible. I pointed out positive things as well as things that I found inconsistent or that were negative in some way.
I don't care so much about not getting a reply from her; my issue is in knowing if what I said and how I said it came off as rude. Did I miss the mark with what I thought was wrapping it nicely? I can't imagine how hard it is for an author to put so much time and heart into something only to receive negative feedback. I really tried to take that into consideration. I've been bothered ever since doing that read since it was only my 4th one to do.
For those of you who are authors, do you not want betas to be honest? You have no idea how many times I've wished I had an author friend who could read what I sent to this author and tell me if I was too harsh. Maybe I shouldn't care, but I do. I want to help, not hurt.
I had one author who never responded to the email I returned with my comments. She never even acknowledged receiving my email, and I know she did bc I replied to the email she originally sent me. I spent hours reading her book and a couple of hours putting my comments together to be as nice as possible. I pointed out positive things as well as things that I found inconsistent or that were negative in some way.
I don't care so much about not getting a reply from her; my issue is in knowing if what I said and how I said it came off as rude. Did I miss the mark with what I thought was wrapping it nicely? I can't imagine how hard it is for an author to put so much time and heart into something only to receive negative feedback. I really tried to take that into consideration. I've been bothered ever since doing that read since it was only my 4th one to do.
For those of you who are authors, do you not want betas to be honest? You have no idea how many times I've wished I had an author friend who could read what I sent to this author and tell me if I was too harsh. Maybe I shouldn't care, but I do. I want to help, not hurt.
Julie you make good points. Did you send a chase email? It's always worth sending a message a few days later to check the first got through - if both are ignored, then it's time to move on.
Precisely because of the sort of feedback a beta is expected to give, I feel it's not usually appropriate to also write a review, as they serve two different purposes: one is a private report to help the writer improve the work, the other a public report for readers to choose what to read.
If a writer asks for a beta read then they need to be prepared to receive negative feedback as well as positive feedback - after all, the usual purpose is to prepare for publication, and once it's published reviewers will point out issues publicly!
Surely part of the unwritten contract between author and beta reader is to be honest and specific with feedback?
Precisely because of the sort of feedback a beta is expected to give, I feel it's not usually appropriate to also write a review, as they serve two different purposes: one is a private report to help the writer improve the work, the other a public report for readers to choose what to read.
If a writer asks for a beta read then they need to be prepared to receive negative feedback as well as positive feedback - after all, the usual purpose is to prepare for publication, and once it's published reviewers will point out issues publicly!
Surely part of the unwritten contract between author and beta reader is to be honest and specific with feedback?
I do want honest feedback, however hard to swallow. I usually take a few days to swallow the negative ones, because it does hurt. The day I get feedback from my betas is usually a day of despair, lol. But then I suck it up, realize they are not calling my baby ugly but trying to help, and I go about making the necessary changes.
However, as someone above said, it is up to the author to make the changes you suggest or not. If he/she is v. attached to one thing remaining as it is, he may not change it. I usually make the bigger changes, esp. if more than one beta point it out. But sometimes I leave certain things, because I meant for them to be that way. So it's up to the author to decide what advice to take and what not to. If you gave honest feedback, you did your job. You can't force the author to make those changes (unless, perhaps, you are co-writing the novel).
However, as someone above said, it is up to the author to make the changes you suggest or not. If he/she is v. attached to one thing remaining as it is, he may not change it. I usually make the bigger changes, esp. if more than one beta point it out. But sometimes I leave certain things, because I meant for them to be that way. So it's up to the author to decide what advice to take and what not to. If you gave honest feedback, you did your job. You can't force the author to make those changes (unless, perhaps, you are co-writing the novel).
Haha, I have no idea if she made the changes since I never heard a word back from her.
I like your policy of taking a few days to digest it. I also agree that nothing important to the author should be changed unless it appears to be a trend spotted by a number of readers. I've never found out if any of my feedback was ever used to make changes. Personally, that doesn't bother me. I beta read because I enjoy it and want to help. An author can take it or leave it since it is their story and only my opinion.
Thanks for replying honestly about negative feedback. I know it is a touchy subject. I don't take giving that type of feedback lightly. It is almost as hard to write as I imagine it would be to read.
I like your policy of taking a few days to digest it. I also agree that nothing important to the author should be changed unless it appears to be a trend spotted by a number of readers. I've never found out if any of my feedback was ever used to make changes. Personally, that doesn't bother me. I beta read because I enjoy it and want to help. An author can take it or leave it since it is their story and only my opinion.
Thanks for replying honestly about negative feedback. I know it is a touchy subject. I don't take giving that type of feedback lightly. It is almost as hard to write as I imagine it would be to read.
I may email her and make sure she got my feedback, but it has been so long now, it would probably be awkward. Do you think it would be appropriate to email her and ask if I was too harsh, though? I'd serious love to know for future reference.
I am such a huge wimp when it comes to scary stories/movies. I won't even watch the trailers on TV for scary movies. lol I would love to be able to read for you, but I know I would keep putting reading off. I'm so sorry!! But thanks so much for the offer!!!
Yes, you might be surprised how many times betas don't respond...I'd say it's much more common than an author not responding. I just figure they were doing me a favor by beta reading anyway, so I can't be too upset about it. With the one I'm working on now, I assumed I'd hear back from half, so I tried to find twice as many willing betas as I thought I'd need.

I can't believe someone would agree to beta read and then not respond. That is so rude! I can understand if something comes up and someone has to back out, but they should still contact the author and let them know.
I will say that, for me, some books take longer to read than others. I typically finish a book in two to three days, but sometimes a book just takes me longer to get through. Reading your post makes me realize that it might be a good idea to shoot my author an email once a week in those cases so they know I'm still reading. It has only happened in one case, but it is something I will keep in mind going forward.
I will say that, for me, some books take longer to read than others. I typically finish a book in two to three days, but sometimes a book just takes me longer to get through. Reading your post makes me realize that it might be a good idea to shoot my author an email once a week in those cases so they know I'm still reading. It has only happened in one case, but it is something I will keep in mind going forward.


Maybe one approach would be to give readers a chapter. It won't be so overwhelming a task to read and if they like it they will ask for more, if they don't you can at least get feedback on the all important first few pages.

Personally, how I myself work is that I don't even name the authors with whom I work unless they name me publicly first or have givien me permission to use them as a reference. Furthermore, regarding manuscript files that I've worked on. I keep them on my computer for a short time after I've sent it with my comments to the author for the sole purpose of being able to refer back to it to refresh my memory if the author asks me further clarifying questions. Once I know we're completely finished working on it I delete it. As for the question of reviewing or rating... I absolutely don't review or rate them until or if I've read the finished, published book. It would be totally unfair to review or rate a draft of an unpublished book.
It's sensible to arrange a deadline with beta readers (realistic: I always wince when I see something like "I need a beta reader who can read it within a couple of days because the publication date is next week"!) and to email them to ask politely how they're getting on if you don't hear from them (that doesn't mean every single day for a week; again, be realistic!).
Luke: Some betas will read a chapter or two, some prefer the whole thing at once - and you can get a much better idea of how the plot works that way. I'm sure there are betas on here who would read your work. I charge a fee for my beta reading and I'm still fairly busy with it, which means I'm having to be careful what I take on time-wise.
If anyone's looking for feedback on writing skill/style rather than on a specific story, don't forget sites like scribophile, where you can post your own writing for critique, read and critique other people's work - and also read writing/critiques by others.
Luke: Some betas will read a chapter or two, some prefer the whole thing at once - and you can get a much better idea of how the plot works that way. I'm sure there are betas on here who would read your work. I charge a fee for my beta reading and I'm still fairly busy with it, which means I'm having to be careful what I take on time-wise.
If anyone's looking for feedback on writing skill/style rather than on a specific story, don't forget sites like scribophile, where you can post your own writing for critique, read and critique other people's work - and also read writing/critiques by others.

I love honest feedback - just want to echo that. I like it in a nice way - but LOVE HONEST FEEDBACK. But I also echo the statement that I generally don't change something unless more than one Beta comments on it OR if it was always something I was worried about.
My Betas have made my book 10 times better than what it was when I started writing it. So I can't imagine, not listening to them. In fact those who weren't overjoyed about it generally gave me the best feedback on what to fix. I think when a person doesn't like something - every little nail sticking up pokes them. LOL But I try to immediately send an email saying "Thank you" especially if the feedback is bad because I may not want to do it later. :-)
On time - I generally give betas 3 weeks to read, and honestly I use their turn around time to let me know how they enjoyed it. Someone who tells me, "I'll read it this weekend" but I don't hear from them for three weeks - it may have taken them a while to get into the book. But when I send it off and a day later I'm getting a response, means they flew through the book and couldn't put it down.
But Both Betas and Authors need to understand that it's a relationship. And like any relationship not every Author is for every Beta. I'm still building betas because I want them for the whole series. LOL And just like any book - even the best books on goodreads - there is a drop between readers of the first and second book.

Of the titles I've volunteered to beta read I have only ever not been able to finish 2 of the titles I was sent, so a 98% completion rate.
I send my feedback, quite frequently I ask a lot of questions, these are things I think the author should ask themselves but mostly I'm curious too. I think only 1 of my authors ever answered those.
When I say "I'll read it", I tell them exactly when I expect to start and finish it. I also email them to tell them EXACTLY when I started so they know I'm on the case.
I explain my feedback and always say they can ask why I've said a particular thing.
I've stopped beta reading to concentrate more on my own writing now but I will come back to it, eventually.
If I've read for you, I hope it was a good experience and your book benefitted from it.
D R wrote: "Lots of good and bad things were said about Beta Readers. Some even wished to bind them in confidentiality clauses and copyright contracts. But honestly, how many authors are willing to pay them?"
Some betas charge a fee, some don't. They all seem to get plenty of work either way.
Some betas charge a fee, some don't. They all seem to get plenty of work either way.
The advantage for charging a small fee is: on the author's side they know they have a reader who will feed back and take it seriously (I have several testimonials on my site to reassure) and on the reader's side they know they have an author who is serious about investing in their work and about seeking honest feedback. Yes, both can happen without money, but it's a bit hit and miss, and being paid means I can justify taking my time over my comments a little more. Don't forget that some critique services charge several hundred pounds, and they're presumably getting the work in.
Self publishing doesn't mean cheap publishing. It means the author takes on the risks and costs themselves but has much more control than trad publishing.
Self publishing doesn't mean cheap publishing. It means the author takes on the risks and costs themselves but has much more control than trad publishing.


Since I am given a free book to read I think it is only honorable to follow the authors wishes. But a signed contract (or a digital version of it), might be a good idea.
I just think that people that have no experience about beta reading might do the types of mistakes you are describing, esp. if the author didn't make any restrictions.
P.J. It is always possible that the person realized that they are not only suppose to read but to do some work. She might have been ashamed, or something in her life might have happened.
It seems to me that this group needs a mod and the one now hasn't been active in more then 4 months.

That is why clear rules for this group should be made. In such cases the mod should be warned, so he can give warning to the people. If they still don't respond they can be banned from the group, so other authors will not suffer.
I think some people assume beta reading is equal to r4r.

Do you think it's okay to ask beta readers the names of some authors they have read for and get feedback from the author on the beta's responsiveness?

Yes, why not. Seems like a good idea. I wouldn't mind.

I have in the past couple of years been overwhelmed with some real life family issues,foreclosure, deaths and helping elderly parents, that have interrupted my beta reading to the point that I completely forgot that I even had them. However, once my mind calmed down enough that I remembered I did make contact and explain what had occurred and apologized profusely.

Well there are other reasons then death, but it can take months. Of course that it is preferable to get back to the author, but not everyone cares enough.
About informing the author, no one knows my passwords, or all the sites and activity I have online. Nor do I live with a family, if something were to happen to me, no one online will ever know.
Ellie [The Empress] wrote: " It seems to me that this group needs a mod and the one now hasn't been active in more then 4 months. ..."
Agreed. I emailed him a while back asking if he'd like some help or to add me as a mod, but never heard back. It would be helpful if we had folders for those offering services, those seeking, and discussion such as this.
Agreed. I emailed him a while back asking if he'd like some help or to add me as a mod, but never heard back. It would be helpful if we had folders for those offering services, those seeking, and discussion such as this.
Maybe there's a way to claim the group? I'd be happy to help out. Although we do all seem a very well behaved bunch (or is saying that asking for trouble?), some organising would be good, as you say.

Agreed. I emailed him a while back asking if he'd like some ..."
That is what I was thinking. If you want to take over the group just flag it and explain the mod is not active and that you would like to be the mod. They will investigate and probably put you as the owner.
Lin, it is a well behaved bunch but for example, folders are needed, for authors and beta reviewers. As well people need to put the genre in the title in my opinion. Seeing 30 topics with a title "beta reader needed" is not very helpful. And a mod can kick out beta readers that don't follow any rules, such as the ones that some of author complained in this topic.

Re: Mods
Some different areas of the group would be useful, it is by far the biggest Beta reader group so a handful of mods may be needed. I would consider helping out here and there if you were looking for some extra hands.

Some different areas of the group would be useful, it is by far the biggest Beta reader group so a handful of mods may be needed. I would consider helping out here and there if you were looking for some extra hands. "
I am not a mod. Someone needs to take over by the method I have described.
Just wanted to run something by you all to see what the general consensus is.
I read today that writers should always ensure that Beta readers sign a contract regarding mainly confidentiality, before they send them work to read.
I also saw somewhere else that some Beta readers add works to goodreads with their comments as a review. This was something else covered in the contract mentioned.
As I am new to using Beta's that I don't know. I would like to know how things are generally done in the view of both seasoned authors and Beta readers.
Do Beta readers generally sign a standard contract regarding conditions around Beta reading?
Also is it common practice for Beta readers to add books they have read in draft form (along with a review), to this site?
I am really not trying (and hope not) to incite any sort of argument about this between readers and writers. Am just generally interested in getting the system straight in my mind before venturing out.
Many thanks