The Sword and Laser discussion
Did you get to read fantasy in school?
date
newest »


In high school though I remember reading a lot of good stuff like Stranger in a Strange Land which was for a Sociology class. And The Odyssey, and horror classics by Poe, Frankenstein, Dracula, The Picture of Dorian Gray we had a really great English teacher
No! I wish. My best friend however went to a different high school, and a lot of his reading material was speculative fiction, particularly sci-fi and fantasy. I believe he studied: LotR, Alice In Wonderland, Wizard of Oz, Dune and Ender's Game. Arg, I feel like I'm missing something in that list. Anyway, I thought it was cool. And he has seemed more interested in the genres since then. Pretty nifty in my opinion.



A Wrinkle in Time
Bridge to Terabithia
The High King
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newbery_...



Brave New World, 1984, The Giver, A Christmas Carol, Beowulf, The Odyssey, Idylls of the King, Le Morte d'Arthur, The Metamorphosis, Inferno, etc.
The two real stand outs were Ray Bradbury's The Illustrated Man and the time I used The Mists of Avalon as a modern classic for a report.

Trike - I will have to look into that at our library... thanks for the suggestion!


In junior high, we were encouraged to read across genre (probably realizing that it was more important for us to read than not).
Books I remember reading for class (by choice): Dandelion Wine, Fahrenheit 451.
We were required to read The Odyssey(which I loved) and Flowers for Algernon. Middle school also featured a number of short stories like All Summer in a Day.
In 4th grade, we had Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMHand A Wrinkle in Time.

Fantasy and SF were not considered "literature" when I was in school. I did read many classic SF/F at that time in my life, but not in class. We were forced to slog through such bo..."
I think some of the YA out there is very well written and learning to analysis it is good for students. Teaching them how to discuss books. But it should be done as book discussions and persuasive essays and creative projects of their own choosing for the most part. Not like some of the old school ways some of may have learned before.

I don't think we even read A Christmas Carol, despite reading every other da..."
We didn't either but I read it on my own and found it better in original format to some of the kid friendly versions though I do still enjoy the muppet version best for movie versions.

I think teachers just need to adapt how they teach it to make it more fun. Since kids today are all over facebook talking about books in our genres. they need to make it not seem so formal. Take a more relaxed approach to it in some ways. Make it more about creativity and exploring the books as fans and not critics.

Middle School through High School was all about the classics and Shakespeare. Though we did get to see the Leonardo DiCaprio version of Romeo And Juliet. It gave me better appreciation for both and some of them I did end up liking.
Now starting out college so far I have done a paper on Dystopian Science fiction through the ages on the genre over the last 35 years. Which is a start. And all through my school years and in between I have read the genres in my free time.

I think that this is a very good point. A curriculum defined in terms of content - 'you should read these books' - is going to put people off learning and off that content, as well as not being great at developing what matters. One built around skills - 'you should learn to analyse the themes of fiction' - and that lets pupils pick their own books to analyse will foster enthusiasm for learning and for reading, as well as developing useful skills.

Exactly and I have friends that I use these skills with all the time for fun. But the way they do it in schools makes it seem so dreary and no fun at all to do. We see people of all ages using them all over facebook now in book groups and even here. I think not only is it important to have the curriculum be about skills but also be enjoyable.



So thanks, whichever grade school teacher made that decision!

So ..."
I may not have gotten to read Redwall in school but I enjoy it a lot to this day and still have to finish the series.


The Hobbit - we even got to perform part of it in class i was dwarf.
there was not much around then- worm orobours, gormenghast,
we'd already read wrinkle in time, tame stuff for me was already reading the golden age greats

That's the only fantasy I remember reading all through K-12th grade. This may be partly because I went to Lutheran schools the whole time. We weren't taught that fantasy/sci-fi were the devil's work or anything goofy like that, but I can see them simply not thinking those types of stories were a viable choice to educate kids.
I mostly stayed away from fantasy in my free-time reading as a kid. My mom had a serious horror fixation, so I was constantly trying not to think about werewolves/vampires/ghosts/etc. when she wasn't talking about them or making me watch stuff like Salem's Lot on tv!

Wow! Talk about an awesome teacher!

In my experiences with American Protestant culture, fantasy and scifi aren't *completely* rejected *unanimously* but there is a great amount of unease towards them. A vague puritanical "reading is good only if it's improving yourself, not just for pleasure" notion has survived, so reading either has to teach you something or make you a better person ethically. All fiction is kind of looked at as "if it's not true, how can it be worth anything. Also, isn't that LYING?" And then fantasy and scifi get this in spades.
The only crusaded-against things were Harry potter, Pokemon, and dnd (though the more radical segments spoke out against lord of the rings) but yeah, in general it's not a thing a American Protestantism is comfortable with.

In my experiences with American Protestant culture, fantasy and scifi aren't *completely* rejected *unanimously* but there is a great amount of unease towards them. A vague puritanical "..."
That's a really interesting point. I recognise that part of the snobbery comes from an idea that fantasy and sf somehow aren't 'real' literature, but I hadn't thought about how that connected into valuing hard work over enjoyment.
While I sometimes like to read a book that challenges me and forces me to think, sometimes there's as much skill in writing a book that easily engages and excites the reader. It seems like some people undervalue that skill because it's not forcing the reader to work as hard as the writer.


Books mentioned in this topic
A Christmas Carol (other topics)The Odyssey (other topics)
A Wrinkle in Time (other topics)
Flowers for Algernon (other topics)
A Medicine for Melancholy and Other Stories (other topics)
More...
I love the idea of reading sci-fi in science class. My science teachers were a bit too serious for that, but it might have got me to stick with the sciences for longer, showing their potential for the future, not just all the stuff that you need for exams.