The Humour Club discussion

280 views
General > Politically Incorrect

Comments Showing 551-600 of 1,586 (1586 new)    post a comment »

message 551: by Rodney (new)

Rodney Carlson (rodneycarlson) | 617 comments Jay wrote: " it can always be Trumped. "

Pun intended?


message 552: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Rodney wrote: "Pun intended?"

“I don't get your drift."
"I will continue snowing.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Summer Lightning


message 553: by Rodney (last edited Jan 12, 2016 12:20PM) (new)

Rodney Carlson (rodneycarlson) | 617 comments Jay wrote: "Rodney wrote: "Pun intended?"

“I don't get your drift."
"I will continue snowing.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Summer Lightning"


as in Donald....
I'll just check "no" next to that.


message 554: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Rodney wrote: "Jay wrote: "Rodney wrote: "Pun intended?"

“I don't get your drift."
"I will continue snowing.”
― P.G. Wodehouse, Summer Lightning"

as in Donald....
I'll just check "no" next to that."


Geez, Rodney! You ask if the pun was intended, and I answered with yet another pun!

Think about that check again. :-)


message 555: by Rodney (new)

Rodney Carlson (rodneycarlson) | 617 comments Jay wrote: "Think about that check again. :-)
"


Except your pun was about not getting the pun.

Don't do that to me, I'm old and get confused easily. Where am I?


message 556: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Rodney wrote: "Except your pun was about not getting the pun.

Don't do that to me, I'm old and get confused easily. Where am I?"


Ah, it's a point of view issue. You asked about Trump, so I gathered you didn't get my 'drift', hence Wodehouse. Easy-peasy.

I rarely have point of view issues anymore. New prescription on the glasses.


message 557: by Rodney (new)

Rodney Carlson (rodneycarlson) | 617 comments I'm glad we got that settled. whew


message 558: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Rodney wrote: "I'm glad we got that settled. whew"

No problemo! Now, we can get back to Trump and I can recycle all my 'bad rug' jokes.


message 559: by Joel (new)

Joel Bresler | 1587 comments Mod
Jay wrote: "Rodney wrote: "Except your pun was about not getting the pun.

Don't do that to me, I'm old and get confused easily. Where am I?"

Ah, it's a point of view issue. You asked about Trump, so I gather..."


Easy-peasy, middle-class squeezy.


message 560: by CartoonistAndre (last edited Jan 12, 2016 05:08PM) (new)

CartoonistAndre | 725 comments Jay wrote: "Rodney wrote: "I'm glad we got that settled. whew"

No problemo! Now, we can get back to Trump and I can recycle all my 'bad rug' jokes."


I don't think that's a rug, Jay. He just prefers that glue for sniffing. They might be extensions, I don't know, he just needs to avoid wind tunnels and alleys.

Here it is 8:00 pm and I'm wondering how the president is feeling right about........now. It's just an hour before his last State of the Union address and Iran pulls off another in-your-face challenge. Big weight on the man's shoulders tonight, and I hope he can reassure a concerned, yet divided, nation. This is his biggest hour.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall!


message 561: by Brenda (new)

Brenda Kearns (brendakearns) | 719 comments Jay wrote: "Rodney wrote: "I'm glad we got that settled. whew"

No problemo! Now, we can get back to Trump and I can recycle all my 'bad rug' jokes."


Go ahead - they never get old :-)


message 562: by Jay (last edited Jan 13, 2016 02:36PM) (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Thoughts on The State of the Union speech:

Trump-slam: 9.6
Republican-slam: 8.2 (Failed to mention anyone's birth certificate.)
ISIS alerts: 9.3
Immigration reform: 6.2 (Didn't really sell the sombrero.)
Good ideas that will never happen: 9.9


Thoughts on the Republican response:

Obama-slam: 8.4 (Lost a whole point on the dismount.)
Democrat-slam: 9.2
Those pesky Middle-Eastern-looking guys alerts: 9.6
Building an anti-Immigrant wall: 9.9 (Extra points for bringing own mortar.)
God-Country-NRA promo: 9.8


message 563: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
Jay wrote: "Thoughts on The State of the Union speech:

Trump-slam: 9.6
Republican-slam: 8.2 (Failed to mention anyone's birth certificate.)
ISIS alerts: 9.3
Immigration reform: 6.2 (Didn't really sell the som..."


I'd say that about covers it.


message 564: by CartoonistAndre (new)

CartoonistAndre | 725 comments Wow! You guys kept score? I was all set to watch it but was invited to go shoot hoops at the rec center.


message 565: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
Apparently there was some sort of thumb-wrestling competition last night between these two -

description

description

and something called Fox Business covered it, for some reason.


message 566: by Joel (new)

Joel Bresler | 1587 comments Mod
It was about the least substantive debate to date that didn't involve Democrats.


message 567: by Melki (last edited Jan 15, 2016 05:11AM) (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
Joel wrote: "It was about the least substantive debate to date that didn't involve Democrats."

Oh, you know that debates involving Democrats only air at 3 AM on Sundays.

On the Golf Channel.


message 568: by Jay (last edited Jan 15, 2016 09:45AM) (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Melki wrote: "Oh, you know that debates involving Democrats only air at 3 AM on Sundays. On the Golf Channel."

Not true, Melki. Democrat's debates are also covered by FOX "News." Perhaps you've seen their expose "Threats to Modern Civilization" which focused on ISIS, The Democratic Party, Third World countries with better reading and math scores than the US, and Tagless Underwear.

It was indeed most interesting watching FOX's anchors and commentators bravely attempt to appear well-balanced by straining themselves to find air-able euphemisms for words that begin with 'mother.'


message 569: by Gary (new)

Gary Jones (gfjones_dvm) | 127 comments Melki wrote: "Joel wrote: "It was about the least substantive debate to date that didn't involve Democrats."

Oh, you know that debates involving Democrats only air at 3 AM on Sundays.

On the Golf Channel."

just after the competitive bass fishing


message 570: by Jilly (new)

Jilly Gagnon (jillygagnon) | 147 comments The count is a good one. I always saw this:




message 571: by CartoonistAndre (last edited Jan 17, 2016 05:40PM) (new)

CartoonistAndre | 725 comments I think MOM (Martin O'Malley) will rock the Democratic debate and within a few short months take a commanding lead. I mean, who is actually still contributing time and money into this guys' campaign? Sure MOM as president has a nice ring to it but I could only see that happening after Bernie Sanders keels over during a physical and Bill and Hillary commit their lives to feeding villagers in the heart of the dark continent....and the Donald starts wearing an orange kehfiyah. Hey, there's always that chance.

And that Gilmore guy in the Republican race. WTH? Where'd he come from? Like there weren't enough candidates running now? Well, it sure has been interesting so far.

WAB


message 572: by Jilly (new)

Jilly Gagnon (jillygagnon) | 147 comments LOVE that cartoon.


message 573: by Gary (new)

Gary Jones (gfjones_dvm) | 127 comments droll


message 574: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Very nice, Andre!

It's given me the courage to post yet another rant:

I must say, considering that it's election season, I'm amazed that so many fine, humorous voices are so dreadfully quiet. Seriously!

One need only look to our campaigning politicians (whether Democrat or Proudly Anal-Retentive), to see that 'publicly shooting off one's mouth without worrying about engaging one's brain' is the order of the day. Aren't we being shown the way... Isn't this leadership by example... Aren't our hopefully-soon-to-be-Fearless-Leaders showing us how to be fearless????

Now, I happen to find presidential election campaigns to be the funniest reality show ever produced. For anyone with even modest humor writing skills, it's like having an entire cadre of straight men at your disposal FREE OF CHARGE!

And so, I implore you, Dear Humour Club Membership, please do not allow a single moment of election season to pass you by! Let's give both of the major political parties (and the Republicans) the shellacking that they truly deserve. After all, this is a time of great political change...

GOP image


message 575: by Jilly (new)

Jilly Gagnon (jillygagnon) | 147 comments Ahhh, the Funny Times! I contributed there back in the day -- still get a paper version every month!


message 576: by Joel (new)

Joel Bresler | 1587 comments Mod
Jilly wrote: "Ahhh, the Funny Times! I contributed there back in the day -- still get a paper version every month!"

Okay, so this is weird. I know the owners of Funny Times, from Cleveland. I had just read this post and logged on to Facebook, where I had a friend request from one of the owner's sister, who was a high school classmate of mine. Quasi-freaky.


message 577: by CartoonistAndre (new)

CartoonistAndre | 725 comments Good luck with the reconnect, Joel!

That's a good one also, Jay. But that 'retooling' was way back in 1998 and the GOP has gotten even hipper now with even younger, smarter, sassier talking heads! There's even talk of introducing some hip reporters that will rap their lines to the younger voters. Well, we may see some rapping for Bernie, I doubt FOX could find anyone anywhere to pop a rhyme for them.

What's this about Hillary's emails being classified sap? Something above Top Secret material found on these recently released emails? I think she'll be sitting through another 11 hours before a different committee again soon. Can you see Biden coming in at the last minute to save the day! You're right, it's so much fun watching the show!


message 578: by Jilly (new)

Jilly Gagnon (jillygagnon) | 147 comments Joel -- I love when the world shrinks to a pinpoint like that. So often it feels overwhelmingly vast.


message 579: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
CartoonistAndre wrote: "Good luck with the reconnect, Joel!

That's a good one also, Jay. But that 'retooling' was way back in 1998 and the GOP has gotten even hipper now with even younger, smarter, sassier talking heads!..."


It's true! That retooling was 1998, however I'm a big fan of recycling. You know, all the oldies but goodies: 'Save the Earth, Don't Vote Against Your Own Self-Interest Just Because Some Putz Tells You It's The Will of God, The NRA, and Exxon, etc.'

I wonder if I can work that into a rap for Bernie?

If the worst they can come up with against Hillary is a few emails, she's basically Snow White and Mother Theresa rolled into one, and Joe won't need to do a White Knight.

I wonder how many Republicans would be willing to put all their emails up for scrutiny. No doubt we'd discover equal parts Top Secret and Victoria's Secret.

Back to you at the studio, Andre.


message 580: by Joel (new)

Joel Bresler | 1587 comments Mod
Jilly wrote: "Joel -- I love when the world shrinks to a pinpoint like that. So often it feels overwhelmingly vast."

Most of the time I only feel half-vast.


message 581: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
And then this happened.

description


message 582: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
I don't believe it. I bet those hammers were paid off!

Did anyone notice, there's not a ball-peen in the bunch?


message 583: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca Douglass (rdouglass) | 2433 comments Mod
Jay wrote: "I don't believe it. I bet those hammers were paid off!

Did anyone notice, there's not a ball-peen in the bunch?"


That's because their lifestyle is an abomination.


message 584: by CartoonistAndre (last edited Jan 20, 2016 11:17AM) (new)

CartoonistAndre | 725 comments Joel wrote: "Jilly wrote: "Joel -- I love when the world shrinks to a pinpoint like that. So often it feels overwhelmingly vast."

Most of the time I only feel half-vast."


Ha-ha! Good pun, Joel.

Jay- No one would argue that there'd be lots Republican emails that could be deemed inappropriate, possibly criminal, but they were not Secretary of State at the time, exchanging classified, no wait, Top Secret, no, hold-it, above that -special access programs, all on a non-secure server hidden in her bathroom like a Victor's Secret catalog. Doesn't bear thinking about!

It's the first I'd heard of SAP files, they are so confidential, even an intern would know enough to keep that sensitive correspondence only on a secure server. But, being the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy that is being bandied about, I'm sure that the FBI and DOJ will look into those allegations...well, wait a minute, those allegations were made by the Intelligence Community Inspector General and part of the investigation into about one dozen files classified SAP.

What's disconcerting is that it's common knowledge that nothing will be done about it. They could catch her on film drowning a sack of puppies and her base would defend those actions and vote for her anyway. Just like Trump can make fun of a handicapped reporter, give Putin a pat on the back, and still not drop a percentage point in the polls. How deep will it get by November is anyone's guess.


Hillary


message 585: by Gary (new)

Gary Jones (gfjones_dvm) | 127 comments It wasn't a problem when Colin Powell also had a private server, but then, he wasn't a Democrat.


message 586: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Gary wrote: "It wasn't a problem when Colin Powell also had a private server, but then, he wasn't a Democrat."

Nor was it a problem when the entire Bush administration lied to the public, US allies and the United Nations concerning KNOWN false intelligence, much of it classified. Nor was it a problem for Cheney to deliberately leak classified intelligence from the Office of the Vice President, then go on television the following day to state, "Now that it's been leaked, I can confirm it."

Anyone who has dealt with classified information (military service, etc.) has seen anomalies crop up with its handling, including people like the Walker family who sold it outright to our enemies. Using classified intel for political gain is certainly not new either. It does however take a truly massive level of hypocrisy to pillory Hillary when her misuse of classified information did not intentionally involve our country in a NEEDLESS war, costing thousands and thousands of lives and over a TRILLION dollars.

Oh, wait! That was legal. The Republicans said it was!

Andre stated, "What's disconcerting is that it's common knowledge that nothing will be done about it." --Good point! Really!!

To be honest, I'm not completely sanguine about that either. My proposal is that Hillary receive the same punishment as Cheney for the misuse of classified intel. That is, have her shoot a friend in the face, and forget about the rest of it.

Now, that's politics!


message 587: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
Jay wrote: "My proposal is that Hillary receive the same punishment as Cheney for the misuse of classified intel. That is, have her shoot a friend in the face, and forget about the rest of it."

Oh, c'mon - you know she's dying to shoot Bill.


message 588: by Gary (new)

Gary Jones (gfjones_dvm) | 127 comments Bill doesn't qualify. She'd have to shoot at a sound (called a 'sound shot'--a really stupid thing to do when you're hunting) and hit a person she'd hardly ever met, then claim they were bosom buddies later.


message 589: by Jay (last edited Jan 20, 2016 04:09PM) (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Melki wrote: "Oh, c'mon - you know she's dying to shoot Bill."

You might be right, Melki. Bill looks shot.

bill-clinton-and-obama-620x362


message 590: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
description

Interesting . . . as Track Palin deployed to Iraq in September 2008, under President George W. Bush.

And there's Bill again, though I didn't know you could get anyone pregnant by using a cigar.


message 591: by CartoonistAndre (new)

CartoonistAndre | 725 comments Melki wrote: "And there's Bill again, though I didn't know you could get anyone pregnant by using a cigar."

Unless you Hav-a-Tampa!

Hey! I’m asking about oranges and I get a banana peel thrown at me. You think I’m going to defend Cheney? He was a Dick, we know that. And Colin Powell? I don’t recall anything about him discussing Top Secret issues on a private server, must’ve missed that article, but I liked the guy- so shoot me.

Along with millions of others, I’m just trying to decide who I want to vote for. I’m sure that comparing the mistakes and blunders made by past administrations will be the natural defensive response to any allegations of wrong-doing by this years nominees, it’s just the old CYA tactic that works so well in a clinch.

Let me put it this way; would any independent thinker have voted for Bush & Cheney if they knew that they’d lie (amongst other things) ? Would those independent thinkers have voted for ‘Slick’ Willy knowing he was a wanker and another fantastic liar? Well, now that we’re (well, most of us) hearing of additional lies and deception from HC, even before the coronation, how can you so easily ‘poo-poo’ her actions. So, It will, again, come down to who will be the least offensive rather than the most trustworthy, experienced candidate to honor the office.


message 592: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
CartoonistAndre wrote: "...would any independent thinker have voted for Bush & Cheney...?????"

We hold these truths to be self-evident, NOT A CHANCE IN HELL!


message 593: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
CartoonistAndre wrote: "Would those independent thinkers have voted for ‘Slick’ Willy knowing he was a wanker . . . "

If he was a wanker, he wouldn't have needed Monica.


message 594: by Gary (new)

Gary Jones (gfjones_dvm) | 127 comments Nothing was said about Colin Powell's use of a private server because that was standard procedure at the time. The rule that they shouldn't be used began in the Obama administration.


message 595: by Jay (new)

Jay Cole (jay_cole) | 5436 comments Mod
Andre, who I tip my hat to for providing such greatly amusing insights into the 2016 campaign season, made an excellent point:

"It will, again, come down to who will be the least offensive rather than the most trustworthy, experienced candidate to honor the office.”

Sad, but once again, supremely true.

There are currently, 1,491 candidates who have filed a Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Election Commission according to Ballotpedia. (Click 'SHOW' next to "FULL LIST") My favorite, of course, is Elvis Bubba Jones, if for no other reason than having a 'Bubba' in the Oval Office would keep The Humour Club in stitches for the duration of his administration.

Still, Andre is correct in finding a trust deficit with all the candidates, and we need a sorting mechanism. This leads to my extremely modest proposal that we rate the leading contenders using an appropriately calibrated scale. Hence, my modest proposal, admittedly based on Andre and Melki's comments above:

The Wanker Scale (0 = least, 10 = most)

Democrats
Hillary Clinton – 8.6
-Confuses 'Madam President' with 'Your Majesty' but can use Rhodes Scholar husband for backup.

Martin O'Malley – 8.7
-Tell me he's not a nerd.
Omalley for President pic

Bernie Sanders – 9.9
-Please refer to Andre's previously posted toon.

Republicans
Jeb Bush - 9.9999999
-Polluted gene pool.

Ben Carson – 9.7
-Lukewarm Obama wannabe

Chris Christie – Sorry, can't fit on the scale.

Ted Cruz – 9.7
-Protected Ten Commandments; Can't remember first ten amendments (Bill of Rights).

Carlie Fiorina – 9.9
-Never got over being Texan.

Jim Gilmore – 9.9
-Never met a war he didn't like or a fur'ner he wouldn't bomb.

Mike Huckabee – 11
-Hates ______. (Fill in blank with just about anyone not personally approved by Jesus.)

John Kasich 8.6
-Who?

Rand Paul – 9.2
-Easily the worst NATURAL hair and his government-provided healthcare doesn't cover it.

Marco Rubio -9.5
-His "new ideas" were just granted membership in AARP.

Rick Santorum – 9.7
-Mitt Romney wannabe.

Donald Trump – 25
-"I am not a narcissist, but let's talk about me."

Independents
We don't do roadkill.

Feel free to do your own wanker assessment. Just like mine, your input may actually be read.


message 596: by Joel (new)

Joel Bresler | 1587 comments Mod
I have my own personal guide to candidate selection, which pretty much rules out everybody:
1. Must need to shave daily (bye, Marco)
2. Must not have auditory hallucinations, e.g., can talk to God but not hear God talking to them (so long Santorum, Huckabee, Cruz)
3. Must never use words like 'golly' or 'gee' or any other Andy Hardy-ish expressions (see ya Jeb, Kasich)
4. Must pee standing up (does not rule out Hillary, but she's a Democrat, which does). Easier to reach the Constitution that way.
5. Must know what the President of the United States's job description is (pretty much takes care of everybody else)


message 597: by Rodney (new)

Rodney Carlson (rodneycarlson) | 617 comments My candidate selection is pretty simple, as I believe we're $cr3w3d no matter what. I'm a rebel, so my one rule is:

1. Which candidate will piss off the most people when I tell them I voted for said candidate.

Last time it was Roseanne Barr. Pretty tough race this time.


message 598: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
Jay wrote: "The Wanker Scale . . . "

Well done. I approve this scale.


message 599: by Melki (new)

Melki | 3540 comments Mod
Rodney wrote: "My candidate selection is pretty simple, as I believe we're $cr3w3d no matter what. I'm a rebel, so my one rule is:

1. Which candidate will piss off the most people when I tell them I voted for sa..."


My wishes are pretty simple, too.

I want a candidate who:

- is willing to admit global warming is a thing and wants to do something about it.

- plans to spend the next four years doing something besides making life easier for the rich.


That's it. That's all I want.

Since the Republicans are too busy denying climate change, evolution, and a woman's right to medical care, AND bending over and spreading their cheeks for the wealthy, they are ALL ruled out.

Pat Paulsen, anyone?


message 600: by Rodney (new)

Rodney Carlson (rodneycarlson) | 617 comments Melki wrote: "I want a candidate who:

- is willing to admit global warming is a thing and wants to do something about it.

- plans to spend the next four years doing something besides making life easier for the rich.
"


Good luck with that. You might get a few to say that stuff, but none of them would do it.


back to top