Reader's Ink discussion
Foreign Affairs: A Novel
>
Question 7
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Carol
(new)
Jan 31, 2014 04:35PM

reply
|
flag
The ending was a surprise to me, and I was saddened. I found myself liking Chuck, and to lose him was most unexpected to me. He became a part of the "Cast" and it felt we really lost an important part when he died. Lurie handled it in a good way, and left the reader (me) feeling saddened but okay about it.

Yup, ironic. And actually, I was genuinely surprised when he croaked. And then it felt a tad gimmicky. Or maybe not gimmicky but a smidge too easy. After all, Vinnie was never forced to actually decide whether to take the risk of REALLY committing to another guy and letting her be all inconvenienced by an actual relationship. (Remember? She's VERY independent and likes her space.) With Chuck gone, she has a tragedy and love lost she can romanticize if she wants, but . . . I dunno. I'm not totally sold that Vinnie really, really, REALLY loved him.
Good comments Ashley & Cheryl. I like both of your takes on this question. Hadn't really thought of it in terms of irony, but yet that's the perfect word. I really did like Chuck, and the happiness the two of them had was kind of beautiful...!! Throw in a little Fido, and it works quite nicely.

And bear with me, because it's been over a year since I read the book, but I seem to remember wondering what Chuck's wife's version of the story would be.
Ooooh, good one, Lauren. I never thought of it as Lurie giving Vinnie her happy ending, but I think it really is the happiest ending Vinnie could've gotten.
And Fred gets his happy ending, while still having had the fun of his fling. The end.
And Fred gets his happy ending, while still having had the fun of his fling. The end.