The Mark of Athena (The Heroes of Olympus, #3) The Mark of Athena discussion


326 views
best couple? percy & annabeth? frank and hazel? or piper and jason?

Comments Showing 101-136 of 136 (136 new)    post a comment »
1 3 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Lesbian_Unicorn im ganna say none of them and solangelo will always be the best


message 102: by Amelia (new)

Amelia M I like Percabetha and Caloe even though Caloe arent in this book


message 103: by Amelia (new)

Amelia M i mean Percabeth


message 104: by Vikirna (new) - added it

Vikirna Percy and Annabeth are obviously great but I also like Jason And Piper together


Arianna why is there even a debate on this?? Both Percy and Annabeth went through so much to be together!! Percabeth for life!!

(plz note i love the other characters and couples but come on)


message 106: by Megan (new) - rated it 5 stars

Megan I only see Percy and Annabeth! Piper and Jason, unfortunately I don't like it (especially if you've read the Trials of Apollo). Hazel and Frank, no way. Leo and Calypso are awesome, but they don't reach Percy and Annabeth levels.


message 107: by [deleted user] (new)

Hazel and Frank are probably the healthiest, too bad they have zero chemistry. They don’t even seem like a couple most of the time. Also why did Rick decide to make Hazel 13 and the rest of the seven 15-16? It served no purpose except unintentionally making it creepy to have Hazel be dating Frank at her age. I think a big problem here is that Rick is good at writing the relationship between characters when it’s leading up to their getting together, but once they actually are it falls flat. The characters are suddenly no longer individuals who can’t live with out their partners and basically become codependent and obsessive. I loved Jason and Piper in The Lost Hero. I wanted them to be together but when they actually were together in Mark Of Athena, they were so different all of a sudden. The relationship was not as good as it promised to be in book one. Same with Percy and Annabeth, they worked beautifully as friends but as soon as Annabeth began to have feelings for him, she treated him and any girl he was friends with horribly. Really though why was Rick so determined to pair everyone up anyway? And treat it like they’re perfect for one another and will always be together. They’re teenagers, it’s completely unrealistic to portray relationships that way. Much as I didn’t like Jason and Piper breaking up, at least it showed that your first boy/girlfriend isn’t the person you stay with forever. Especially at that age when everyone is so immature and usually end up being completely different people once they reach adulthood.


Camille S. Percabeth will forever be one of my favorite ships of all time. Piper and Jason I found a bit irritating, and Frank and Hazel are just too adorable.


message 109: by kiwi (new) - rated it 4 stars

kiwi Piper and Jason :)


message 110: by [deleted user] (new)

I honestly can’t pick between them. Percy and Annabeth have the best development. Jason and Piper have the most potential. Hazel and Frank have the healthiest relationship. I don’t really have a favorite because the romance in this series isn’t written well enough for me to like one better than the other, as is the case with most YA novels.


message 111: by [deleted user] (new)

frank and hazel


message 112: by Tankstreet (new) - added it

Tankstreet I like percy and annabeth because I hate to break it to yall, but I did a little(lot) of resarch to find out which of the two couples were the most powerful, and piper may have charmspeak, but percy and annabeth can withstand that.


message 113: by Jonah (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jonah Schwandt PERCABETH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


message 114: by Jonah (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jonah Schwandt Halena W wrote: "Oh, they're calling it Caleo. Yes, totally them!!!"
I agree, I want to see more of Caleo!!! :)


message 115: by Cindy (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cindy PERCABETH FOR LIFE YALL


message 116: by Marlow (new) - rated it 5 stars

Marlow SOLANGELO.


message 117: by Marlow (new) - rated it 5 stars

Marlow SOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELOSOLANGELO!!


message 118: by Cindy (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cindy PERCABETH!!


message 119: by kate (new) - rated it 5 stars

kate I love all of those couples but my favorite ship is Percabeth, so I have to say Percabeth haha. I really like how their relationship built up throughout all of the books.


message 120: by Tankstreet (new) - added it

Tankstreet i4gotmyboba wrote: "SPOILER ALERT When I first read the Hero of Olympus so I thought of Piper and Jason. But then I read the PJ series but was still hooked to Piper and Jason. It so sad the Jason died. But two years l..."
jason died in trials of apollo


message 121: by Marlow (new) - rated it 5 stars

Marlow Why are y’all ignoring solangelo?


message 122: by Marlow (new) - rated it 5 stars

Marlow *gasp*


message 123: by Marlow (new) - rated it 5 stars

Marlow Umm... okay? I’m lgbt+, and it isn’t really difficult to understand. We’re just a bunch of people who simply do not vibe with heteronormativity or our assigned gender at birth or both. If you want me to explain something more in depth, I’m happy to as long as you ask in a respectful way. By the way, there is no age restriction on lgbt people, or there at least really shouldn’t be. If a kid is old enough to understand heterosexual or cisgender people, they’re old enough to understand lgbt+ people. I’m also just going to mention that you can be homophobic even if you have lgbt+ family. Trust me, I know from experience. Also, please don’t call yourself “neutral” on a topic like this. Our existence isn’t a debate question. We exist, and we deserve the same rights and visibility as everyone else.


message 124: by Marlow (new) - rated it 5 stars

Marlow Umm... okay? I’m lgbt+, and it isn’t really difficult to understand. We’re just a bunch of people who simply do not vibe with heteronormativity or our assigned gender at birth or both. If you want me to explain something more in depth, I’m happy to as long as you ask in a respectful way. By the way, there is no age restriction on lgbt people, or there at least really shouldn’t be. If a kid is old enough to understand heterosexual or cisgender people, they’re old enough to understand lgbt+ people. I’m also just going to mention that you can be homophobic even if you have lgbt+ family. Trust me, I know from experience. Also, please don’t call yourself “neutral” on a topic like this. Our existence isn’t a debate question. We exist, and we deserve the same rights and visibility as everyone else.


message 125: by Sarah W (new) - added it

Sarah W Percy and Annabeth for sure. They have a relationship built on years of friendship. They’re completely natural around each other. Piper and Jason are always worrying and tiptoeing around each other, whereas Percy and Annabeth know each other backward and forward and love each other for it.


message 126: by Tankstreet (new) - added it

Tankstreet deleted user wrote: "I honestly can’t pick between them. Percy and Annabeth have the best development. Jason and Piper have the most potential. Hazel and Frank have the healthiest relationship. I don’t really have a fa..."
god damnit gray


message 127: by Tankstreet (new) - added it

Tankstreet deleted user wrote: "I honestly can’t pick between them. Percy and Annabeth have the best development. Jason and Piper have the most potential. Hazel and Frank have the healthiest relationship. I don’t really have a fa..."

like really bro


message 128: by Sara (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sara Ok, Percabeth is my OTP forever. Jasper... I like them, but not that much. Sorry. But Frazel... SUPER CUTE AND ADORABLE. I LOVE THEM SO MUCH AAAAAHH

So, my order is: Percabeth, Frazel and then Jasper


Jasmine Definitely Percabeth!!!! They're sooo cute together


message 130: by Joseph (new)

Joseph Nelson percabeth, jason and piper is a weird couple, and hazel and frank have some problems


DemiFangirlWarrior99 Percabeth and SOLANGELO

and my BROTP: Person/Jercy


message 132: by Mishal (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mishal Leo and Calpyso but they werent in this book....


Michael Hederman Percabeth


message 134: by Addie (new) - rated it 5 stars

Addie Donnell CALEO


message 135: by Addie (new) - rated it 5 stars

Addie Donnell and i hate solangelo.


message 136: by Addie (new) - rated it 5 stars

Addie Donnell Marlow wrote: "Umm... okay? I’m lgbt+, and it isn’t really difficult to understand. We’re just a bunch of people who simply do not vibe with heteronormativity or our assigned gender at birth or both. If you want ..."

ew.


1 3 next »
back to top