Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) discussion
Archived Chit Chat & All That
>
Just Talking
message 851:
by
Darren
(new)
Jun 14, 2016 07:08AM

reply
|
flag

For another group's group read, there was a character who used "widdle" and "wee" instead of "pee" or "urinate."
I criticized it as being a really cutesy / childish word choice, since in the US you don't use either of those euphemisms seriously once you're out of elementary school. Another group member suggested those euphemisms might be used more often in British English than in American English. (The character is British.)
I'm skeptical. I've seen "widdle" used sarcastically for "little" but I can't remember the last time I saw it or "wee" used for "pee".
Is this something that adult Brits actually say? And if so, does it have the same childish connotations that it has in the US?

For another group's group read, there was a character who used "widdle" and "wee" instead of "pee" or "urinat..."
'Wee' is being used by adults, without the connotation, although not in every circle (more colloquial). I've heard it and used it too. There is also the Scottish 'wee' for litte, which you can hear quite a bit too, not just by Scottish people either.
'Widdle', and piddle, however I haven't heard as much. Colloquial too.
When was your book written?

Yep, I use the word wee all the time, as does everyone I know. It's not a childish word, but maybe not professional in the workplace etc. Some people I know use the word pee, but that's rarer and to my ear sounds ruder. Being polite, we'd just say that we needed to use the toilet. I've never heard of widdle, but maybe it's a regional thing.

Veronique wrote: "When was your book written? ..."
The Crane Wife, so 2013, and set in a London suburb.
Pink wrote: "Being polite, we'd just say that we needed to use the toilet..."
You wouldn't say piss in a workplace either. We have a dozen variations of politer ways to say it. Restroom, Bathroom, etc. Though this book was referring to the actual action, so none of those would have worked.
Thanks for the info!


I may have mentioned this before but it's worth mentioning again that today is the day of the one sport event I would like to take part, JUKOLA! (But I would like to run in the men's relay because it is during the night. It's possible for women but not with my running and orienteering skills...) But it's the biggest orienteering relay event in the world, with over 1700 teams in men's Jukola (7 legs) and almost 1400 in women's Venlas (4 legs), total of 17,558 orienteers this year.
I also like the fact that it's named after and the idea came from a Finnish classic (and the first novel written in Finnish) Seven Brothers, the brothers were from a farm called Jukola and their love interest was Venla. And that both the world's best orienteers and (hardly even) amateur teams from work places and even real brothers etc. compete in the same race, and people from their teens to probably some in their 60s at least. There's something very positive about it, and of course people are helping each other behind the "real", competetive teams.
Here are some greatest moments from last year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLkPV... The start is magnificent, at 11 PM 1700 runners with their headlights (this is from 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArpKA...) going in to a relatively dark forest (it's almost Midsummer after all) and the winner finishes around 7 AM. So I will be watching it all throughout the night.



That sounds really impressive, something one ought to take part in! I just started running and it feels like I found a previously missing limb, it's exhilarating!
Tytti wrote: "I might also use "wee" if I ever needed a word for that (that's rare even in Finnish), so it's common enough for me to have picked it up from somewhere (TV?). And wee for little is also known to me..."
That looks like so much fun, Tytti! I wish I could run it! Thanks for sharing the video.
That looks like so much fun, Tytti! I wish I could run it! Thanks for sharing the video.

And this time the seven men of the winning team run 84+ km in total, it took them a few minutes over 8 hours (the ideal time was just under it but the weather made it more difficult, and muddy!), and still the first three teams finished under 2.5 minutes from each other. I can't understand how they can run that fast on that terrain, I would be afraid of falling over all the time. But of course there were also tent saunas for the orienteers, it must have felt especially great to get to have a proper warm bath afterwards. And there was at least one 77-year-old taking part in his 42nd Jukola, too. The start was particularly pretty this year because it was so dark because of the rain but no good video yet online.
It's also a tradition that the winner reads a message that also quotes the novel, this year it was about biodiversity and bioenergy. http://www.jukola.com/2016/en/2016/06... The winning team won for the first time since 1966, so that was nice, too.
Tytti wrote: "MMG wrote: "That looks like so much fun"
And this time the seven men of the winning team run 84+ km in total, it took them a few minutes over 8 hours (the ideal time was just under it but the weat..."
That's fantastic and inspiring! Thanks for the introduction to Seven Brothers, too.
And this time the seven men of the winning team run 84+ km in total, it took them a few minutes over 8 hours (the ideal time was just under it but the weat..."
That's fantastic and inspiring! Thanks for the introduction to Seven Brothers, too.
Five years ago today I joined this group. Paraphrasing Robert Frost, I came to a fork in the road of my reading and had to choose how to continue. Was I going to stay on the old path, or start traveling a new one? Until I joined this group my reading was mostly concentrated on contemporary mysteries and non-fiction. I was a bookstore cheapskate, if a book cost more than $6.99 I didn’t even look at it. So I ended up reading a lot of Clive Cussler, James Patterson, and Stuart Woods. I also read authors I had never heard of simply because the book was priced right, Bryce Courtenay, Edward Rutherfurd, and Marge Piercy come to mind.
I never considered reading classics to be worthwhile. I thought they would be dated, boring, and difficult to read, so I left them alone. It’s not that I had never read any classics, but that was when I was a kid or in school, when I read books like Huck Finn, Call of the Wild, Black Beauty, and others.
After joining this group I started reading a few classics. I found them to be enjoyable and interesting. Yes, many were dated and a small number have been boring. And yes, they are a little more difficult to read than the modern publishing’s I was reading. But I also found most to be well crafted and beautifully written. Joining this group has been a game changer. The majority of my reading now involves classics or at least older books. I have a fairly loose interpretation on what defines a classic. I think a book about 40 years old or older that has stood the test of time (still readily accessible) is a classic.
So for the last five years I have been traveling the classic reading fork in the road it’s perhaps less traveled than the modern main stream, but taking this less traveled path has made all the difference. I have always enjoyed reading but never have I enjoyed it more than I have over the last five years.
I never considered reading classics to be worthwhile. I thought they would be dated, boring, and difficult to read, so I left them alone. It’s not that I had never read any classics, but that was when I was a kid or in school, when I read books like Huck Finn, Call of the Wild, Black Beauty, and others.
After joining this group I started reading a few classics. I found them to be enjoyable and interesting. Yes, many were dated and a small number have been boring. And yes, they are a little more difficult to read than the modern publishing’s I was reading. But I also found most to be well crafted and beautifully written. Joining this group has been a game changer. The majority of my reading now involves classics or at least older books. I have a fairly loose interpretation on what defines a classic. I think a book about 40 years old or older that has stood the test of time (still readily accessible) is a classic.
So for the last five years I have been traveling the classic reading fork in the road it’s perhaps less traveled than the modern main stream, but taking this less traveled path has made all the difference. I have always enjoyed reading but never have I enjoyed it more than I have over the last five years.





I just got an email that the group is going to be reading

I'm 44 years old going on 2, apparently I know nothing! :-(



Discussions in most groups start on the first of the month - though a few groups start on the 15th.
The threads are generally started close to the end of the month or on the 1st at latest.


And I can't believe Bob has been on here 5 years. The time does fly. I think I only found out about GoodReads itself in 2013. If it wasn't for a random penpal mentioning it, I might still be out there not knowing and losing out on wonderful book reading friends. ♥

Buddy reads, which are set up by group members may have discussion threads up and running before they start.
There is a 'how our group works' post somewhere near the top of our group, that tries to explain everything that's going on (sorry can't link at the moment from my phone) but don't worry about understanding everything, I know it takes time to get to grips with how different groups run things. So if you have any more questions, just ask :)

Yes, the phone thing. I'm on my computer right now because I'm going to try to finish and review another book if I can. I hate when I'm trying to use my phone, it types the craziest stuff. The un smart phone. I still fight with that thing after so many years. :-D


I'll start on the discussion threads for Bleak House next week so that it will be ready on July 1st. And we do link the discussion threads to the book covers that appear on our home page as Currently Reading.

I actually ordered it used a couple of months ago and was excited to see it on the list :-)

I recently rejoined Audible on a special offer for 99 cents for 3 months. When I was a member previously, I never used up my credits before they would expire. They made a lot of money on me. I thought of audio books as being for only less literary books and really long trips. Now that I read an article saying that listening to a book has the same benefits as reading, I may be more open to listening more. Also it will help to keep up with all these books this group has me wanting to read when I can "read" in the car.



Do you mean like html? you can use square brakets so these [] around the term book: title . If it can't find the specific book or version you want to link too use book: title |number where the number is in the html link for that book so.
book: Wind in the Willows |5659 which turns into this Wind in the Willows when put in square brackets.
This is all in the help section which can be found by hovering over your profile picture.


http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/the-f...

http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/the-f..."
There are certainly some very bizarre habits from some of these authors.

http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/the-f......"
It's amazing what lengths to which people will go when they are driven. I kind of feel for James Joyce though, what a way to have to write! ;-)

http://www.adweek.com/galleycat/the-f..."
Thanks for sending that, Bat-Cat. It makes me feel so boring by comparison. I like to write while in silence while my husband is out and about. Maybe I should try something more odd. Perhaps it would help my writing.
Books mentioned in this topic
They Were Sisters (other topics)The Wind in the Willows (other topics)
The Wind In The Willows (other topics)
The Consequence of Anna (other topics)
The Consequence of Anna (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Kate Birkin (other topics)Robert Coover (other topics)
Ray Bradbury (other topics)
Kate Birkin (other topics)
Kate Birkin (other topics)
More...