DIVERGENT FAN CLUB discussion
Fan talk
>
Do you think Tris should be blamed for shooting Will?
message 1:
by
Aishatariq
(new)
Dec 19, 2013 01:31AM

reply
|
flag





No, because Will was under the simulation and she couldn't think fast enough to think of an alternative option.












Yes because the only solution shouldn't be to automatically shoot your friend- be wise Tris. But Will was under simulation so she shouldn't be entirely blamed!


I totally agree with you @Abigail

I don't think she should've killed him. She could've shot him somewhere else. In my mind, even if he was under a stimulation and she was stressed, the first thing to go through her mind shouldn't be to kill him. And it wasn't an accident that she did, and she didn't aim blindly either.
"The bullet hit him in the head. I know because that's where I aimed it." -
"The bullet hit him in the head. I know because that's where I aimed it." -
If she didn't then it would have changed the story. But Amanda^ I thought of that when I read it! :P

Robin45089 wrote: "I don't think Tris should be blamed for killing Will, I mean it was a matter of life and death. Also, Tris would've died. It's like saying that Tris, who had no other option should be blamed but if..."
You're absolutely right! ;)
You're absolutely right! ;)

You make a good counter claim but that doesn't change my mind.
Okay. I don't think Tris should be blamed, but still she didn't HAVE to kill him…

It's like if someone came in your house and held a fun to your head and you could defend yourself you should
Will was not will when he was about to shoot her
He was a robot




