Into Thin Air
discussion
Into Thin Air- Exceptional Read
date
newest »




However, I still say Into Thin Air was an excellent read.






Having lived and climbed with Scott Fischer in the Wind River Range for five weeks during the summer of 1974, the story was made all the more personal and heartfelt for his loss.

been questioned by others who were there.


I wouldn't say Chris McCandless was a wannabe hermit.

Couldn't agree more! I couldn't put it down once I began reading it.


I recently saw the Boukreev book and Weathers book at Barnes & Noble but decided not to buy them. This was partly because I'm already reading other things, but it was also partly because I didn't think they would be as good as Into Thin Air. Furthermore, Boukreev seemed like kind of a jerk in Into Thin Air; I couldn't believe he went down as a guide when his compatriots were dying up there. Weathers's story would surely be fascinating, but his was a mass market paperback co-authored by someone else, so I wasn't sure about it. Any recommendations?


I suggest you read the book if you read Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster. It will give you the other side of the story. Nobody said Krakauer was the definitive right story. My experience tells me there is more to meet the eye in these kinds of situations.

That's a whole lot of hate. A truckload of bitterness, but it would seem from my amateurish, non climber point of view, Krakauer had a valid point. None of those tourists really had any business being on that mountain, and they paid for it.


My point exactly, Christopher. Krakauer's too, it would seem.

Overall, I thought it was a great read and presented the opportunity to establish a connection between the reader and writer. Krakauer thoroughly explained his experience in effort to..."
Read this book four or five times; never gets old. Still remember my first time with it--and what a harrowing read it was. A must-read for any armchair explorer.

OUTSTANDING!!! It is so very cool that it lasts. I have bought 5 copies over the years because I keep giving mine away to people - and then they love it so much they recommend it and give the copy I gave them away!!! I guess that speaks for itself.
Greg

I just ordered Bourkeev's and Weather's books. Can't wait to read.


We went to the library and checked it out.
She is gobbling it up - loves it!
That book has legs
Greg


I think the point Krakauer was trying to make, right or wrong, was that Anatoly was a paid guide with responsibility to the paying clientele to help usher them up and down the mountain as safely as possible. His personal quest to climb without the use of supplemental oxygen shouldn’t have been undertaken under these circumstances and probably should have been done at another time, when he wasn’t on the clock.
But for those who want to hear his side of the story need only to read “The Climb: Tragic Ambitions of Everest”, his personally account of the tragedy published mere months before his own untimely death on Annapurna I. He does a fitting job of filling in the blanks left out from “Into Thin Air” and answering his many critics.

Though it's a point he made, I think it's a minor one. Major point being human folly.....
Great story though, a kind of mythology for the modern age....


Justin wrote: "Hi Atul, not sure if you were writing to me or to Pete, but I also read 'The Climb'. Jon Krakauer is a professional writer who had a riveting story to tell and told it well; Anatoly Bourkreev wasn'..."
Graham Ratcliffe's "A Day to Die For" is a must read too. Krakauer either lied by omission or completely failed in his research about the storm being "rogue" or a "typical Everest squall". Two other teams were getting daily, high altitude weather forecasts and shared the info with both Rob and Scott's teams. They knew the storm was coming. Rob's sirdar knew about the reports, but Krakauer never interviewed him. Why?
Graham Ratcliffe's "A Day to Die For" is a must read too. Krakauer either lied by omission or completely failed in his research about the storm being "rogue" or a "typical Everest squall". Two other teams were getting daily, high altitude weather forecasts and shared the info with both Rob and Scott's teams. They knew the storm was coming. Rob's sirdar knew about the reports, but Krakauer never interviewed him. Why?
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster (other topics)Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster (other topics)
Overall, I thought it was a great read and presented the opportunity to establish a connection between the reader and writer. Krakauer thoroughly explained his experience in effort to conquer Everest and the difficulties faced internally and externally. He captured the feelings felt during the time of the progression reaching the summit and back to the ground. I agreed and admired the fact that he gave background information of previous happenings for some who didn’t know and achievements and hardships of people he encountered. I felt close to the author because of his extensive diction, comprehensive commentary, and intense moments mentioned. Also, he always made sure to connect it to the long term themes of trust and loyalty among teammates, questions may remain unanswered, and overwhelming the force of nature. I advise one’s who have yet to read the book to quickly buy it and become attached as I am to the events and uncover to the extent of the experiences Jon Krakauer was confronted with while conquering the great Mount Everest!