Science and Natural History discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archived
>
Group Read Nominations for November
date
newest »
newest »
I submitted 4 books for cosidersation; yes ---this is more than the limit of one: but as a good scientist I am compelled to bend/break rules in order to advance.
Steven wrote: "I submitted 4 books for cosidersation; yes ---this is more than the limit of one: but as a good scientist I am compelled to bend/break rules in order to advance."
Actually struch that rule pr. your suggestion.. It was I think a way to limit the nr. of suggestion, lest we get far too many to choose from. But we'll see how we make due without.
Actually struch that rule pr. your suggestion.. It was I think a way to limit the nr. of suggestion, lest we get far too many to choose from. But we'll see how we make due without.
Steven wrote: "I submitted 4 books for cosidersation; yes ---this is more than the limit of one: but as a good scientist I am compelled to bend/break rules in order to advance."Steven: I loved this comment. Thanks for the chuckle! - Bette
I absolutely loved Ben Goldacre's "Bad Medicine - ?Quacks, Hacks, , and Big Pharma Flacks," and think it would make for a good discussion. Quite serious and very funny.
Wild Minds: What Animals Really ThinkDespite Hauser's recent controversies I've wanted to read this and Moral Minds for a while.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think (other topics)Deadly Feasts: The "Prion" Controversy and the Public's Health (other topics)




- Books must be nonfiction, within our general theme.
- Nominations are open until 16th of September.
- Please add suggestions using add book/author.
- All recommendations will be featured in a subsequent poll.
- Feel free to pitch, especially in the comments at the poll.