Language & Grammar discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
1100 views
Grammar Central > What's Your Word for the Day?

Comments Showing 2,651-2,700 of 3,049 (3049 new)    post a comment »

message 2651: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (havan) | 1026 comments I'd like to nominate aliterate as our word of the day - a person who is able to read but rarely chooses to do so. I saw the word in an essay posted on another website and it really deserves to be read Are you a Morlock?

aliterate reminded me first of alliteration so I looked it up and it reminded me of a horrifying statistic that I encountered few years ago.

In 2004, a National Endowment for the Arts report titled "Reading at Risk" found only 57 percent of American adults had read a book in 2002, a four percentage point drop in a decade. The study faulted television, movies and the Internet.

Another study pointed out that one in four American adults had read no books the preceding year.


message 2652: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
As an inveterate bookworm, I should have known better than to marry an aliterate. No wonder it didn't last.


message 2653: by John (last edited Dec 23, 2010 11:03AM) (new)

John David (nicholasofautrecourt) And to make things worse, I bet they're counting trashy romance novels and travel books in the 57%. If you only counted "important books," I'd imagine you might well dip into the low double or even single digits.

And good job cropping that photo, daddio.


message 2654: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
cirripid (n)
A member of the order of crustaceans which, in their adult stage, attach themselves in a parasitic way to other creatures or objects. eg barnacles.
"Do you think (insert person's name) might leave home this year or is she/he to be our permanent cirripid?"


message 2655: by Stephen (last edited Jan 05, 2011 05:27AM) (new)

Stephen (havan) | 1026 comments Woa Gabi! you mean if I compare his goodreads "read list" with mine we'd match 100% ? At least according to what he's read. I liked all three of the ones that he liked.

Course earlier today a new member commented on four topics that I had posted to in another group. I disagreed with 4 out of four of her posts so I decided to compare books. We had zero in common and she had 35 books listed.


message 2656: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
metaplasmus....(figure of speech).....describes a misspelling that still serves it's purpose.....ie fruit stall advertising....punkin $3.


message 2657: by Geoffrey (new)

Geoffrey | 126 comments It could be worse. Here in Mexico, Mexicans read on the average between 1-2 books a year. I had an English class with three students, all of whom were biochemists and only one had a book in 2005, The DaVinci Code.


message 2658: by Jan (new)

Jan (auntyjan) | 1259 comments Stephen, you and I have only 11 books in common, half of which I haven't read yet. One that you have marked as 'to read' is The Power of One, by Bryce Courtenay. I would heartily recommend that one. I wonder if I will ever finish listing my books. I haven't even listed half of them yet. Something to put on my to do list for 2011.


message 2659: by Terence (new)

Terence (spocksbro) Mammock:

1. A fragment, scrap
2. To break, tear, or cut into fragments; shred.

"Thus saying, he nearer crept
On his empty stomach;
Marked his bright spoil, and leapt -
O, like a love-adept
How he could mammock!"
(from, "Kill Joy," Sylvia Townsend Warner)


message 2660: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Mommock looks much more a noun than a verb, doesn't it? Yes, I found a mammock at curbside, but I had difficulty mammocking it into smaller pieces.

Hmn. Reminds me of Mamaroneck -- a town in New York.


message 2661: by Aryn (new)

Aryn | 136 comments This was a fun article; hopefully the site isn't redundant for all of you.
http://grammar.about.com/od/words/a/T...


message 2662: by John (new)

John David (nicholasofautrecourt) I only knew 16 of the 20.


message 2663: by Aryn (new)

Aryn | 136 comments John wrote: "I only knew 16 of the 20."

You did far better than I, so congrats!


message 2664: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
I only knew 21 out of 20 (are Dun and/or Bradstreet anywhere on the premises?).

Anyway, Buckley was always that classic case of a guy using $10 vocabulary where one buck would do.


message 2665: by John (last edited Feb 21, 2011 04:04PM) (new)

John David (nicholasofautrecourt) But then I guess the value of the word changes whether you know it or not. "Periphrastic" is only $1 for someone who knows it, but $5 (or $10, or whatever else) for someone who doesn't.


message 2666: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Hmn, kind of an egotist spin on it, don't you think? It's like saying, "If I know what otiose means, then it's a 5-and-dime word, but if I don't, then it's a 10-dollar show-off piece." Me, me, me. That's the deciding factor.

I'd say the value of words is in their usefulness for communication among the greatest number of people. If the majority are scratching their heads while the speaker struts in bantam-like satisfaction, what good is it?

The ideal, I think, is having a great vocabulary but seldom using it. The high-falutin' stuff should be reserved for certain audiences (read: highbrow). Maybe that was Buckley's reading audience, I don't know. Personally I never read an arcane word of him.


message 2667: by John (last edited Feb 21, 2011 04:31PM) (new)

John David (nicholasofautrecourt) No, it really has nothing to do with egotism, I don't think. Or, if it does, only in the strictest sense. It has to do with the words that you know, or that you don't. "Extraordinary" would be a "big word" to 5-year old, but is that a $10 word? It all depends on what your baseline for average is.

And I'm not sure that Buckley would have accepted your theory of demotic language. There are some uses for language whose goals aren't to reach the widest possible audiences: they aim for accuracy and precise first, above accessibility. I don't know why writers should aim for the middle of the Bell curve.

It's sort of old-fashioned to draw a hard-and-fast distinction between high- and low-brow, but, being familiar with some of the stuff he wrote, he probably did it himself. Having the political inclinations that he did probably didn't hurt, either.


message 2668: by Stephen (last edited Feb 21, 2011 07:25PM) (new)

Stephen (havan) | 1026 comments First as to William F. Buckley... The man can't open his mouth without what sounds like a $10 word coming out. He comes from a blue blood background and even expletives sound as though they've been to finishing school coming from his mouth.

But, back on topic I'd like to suggest a pair of words of the day...
Venal and Venial

venal - willing to sell one's influence, especially in return for a bribe
venial - able to be forgiven or pardoned; not seriously wrong, as a sin

I came across the sentence How many of the Sunlord's priests were corrupt and venial creatures, with no more calling than a cat.

I'm guessing that the author got her words mixed up. Course this author only has about 30 or so popular novels to her credit, so she probably can't afford a good editor...


message 2669: by Aryn (new)

Aryn | 136 comments Stephen wrote: "I'm guessing that the author got her words mixed up. ..."

Or she was being slyly humorous at her readers' expense. Personally, I'm giggling.
To weigh in on $10 words; one of the great things about the English language is one has the possibility of using just exactly the RIGHT word to say exactly what is meant. If that means I have to read with a good dictionary next to me, I'm game. And sometimes not only the language matters, but where and even when the author learned it. So whereas my friend in WI would read 'plethora' and think 'a lot', I would read the same word and think 'an embarrassment of riches' or along those lines. Makes a huge difference to how the passage is interpreted.


message 2670: by Ken, Moderator (last edited Feb 22, 2011 03:10AM) (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Heh. Venial cats. Good one. Doesn't explain the cattiness, though.

Aryn, you've nailed it. Le mot juste, which might mean "the right word" if I remember my French (I'm almost sure "left" is gauche). When you DON'T use the right word because you're more intent on impressing your reader with your vocabulary, your ethos, as the (what else?) ancient Greeks would say, takes a hit. A fatal hit, I might add. I can't tell you how many writers and speakers I've stopped reading/listening to once I became convinced they were using unnecessary words to feed their own lack of self-confidence (or some other Oprah-worthy condition).


message 2671: by Ruth (last edited Feb 22, 2011 09:09AM) (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
When I was very young, I used to think Wm Buckley was the ultimate in urbane sophistication. Now he's become a caricature of himself. Yech.


message 2672: by Aryn (new)

Aryn | 136 comments Newengland wrote: "Heh. Venial cats. Good one. Doesn't explain the cattiness, though."

Too funny!


message 2673: by Geoffrey (new)

Geoffrey | 126 comments But aside from his oversized ego, his caustic wit, verbose and pompous demeanor, slashing tongue, the former guardian of the right was also a vindictive s.o.b. When Kunstler bested him in public debate, Wm. F__ly sought to have him disbarred.


message 2674: by Jim (new)

Jim (jakadeus) | 2 comments pawkily adv form of pawky

Shrewd and cunning, often in a humorous manner.

Found in The Glory and the Dream by William Manchester.

"In 1970 a national advertiser taunted middle-aged Americans by running a photograph of a 1930s dance marathon and asking pawkily, 'Now What Were You Saying About Today's Youth?'"


message 2675: by Ken, Moderator (last edited Apr 16, 2011 02:08PM) (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Pawky. New one for me. Thanks, Jim.


factotum [fak-TOH-tum] (n.) -- a general servant with myriad duties or [2] a jack-of-all-trades. Plural = factotums.


message 2676: by Aryn (new)

Aryn | 136 comments Newengland wrote: "Pawky. New one for me. Thanks, Jim.


factotum [fak-TOH-tum] (n.) -- a general servant with myriad duties or [2] a jack-of-all-trades. Plural = factotums."


Tried to find you elsewhere on a list and couldn't, so please forgive the off-topic. I have been listening to a book I thought you might enjoy, titled Bozo Sapiens, re logical thinking. Take care. (Did the Kitchen Sink sink? Couldn't find it under groups. TTFN)


message 2677: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
And might I enjoy that book because I'm one of the Bozo Sapiens???


message 2678: by Aryn (new)

Aryn | 136 comments Heavens, no. Because you were interested in rhetoric, and a lot of what passes for 'knowledge' these days is little more than a fast pass with the 'BS wand' (think Harry Frankfort). Of course, I could be mistaken.


message 2679: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Oh. Inferiority complex, is all. I come from the other side of the tracks, you see. Thanks for that.

Today's WOTD:


plantar fasciitis (n.) -- inflammation and soreness of the bottom of the foot.

I choose this word because it's a great spelling challenge AND because I am off to watch (better to watch than to run) the Boston Marathon in a few hours. Plus, I have suffered this myself as a runner. That, and the equally damnable piriformis syndrome -- one pain in the ass.


message 2680: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
I am not a runner, but have managed to suffer this, too.


message 2681: by Carol (new)

Carol | 10410 comments I had it from standing too many hours at work.


message 2682: by Debbie, sardonic princess of cheerfulness (new)

Debbie (sardonicprincessofcheerfulness) | 6389 comments Mod
Never got it....don't run, won't stand for it! (hee)


message 2683: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Now there's a woman with sole!


Today's WORDS OTD:

gourmet (n.) -- one who knows well and appreciates the finer points of food and drink.

gourmand (n.) -- a glutton for food and drink.

epicure (n.) -- same as gourmet, though perhaps with a touch of overrefinement. Epicureanism is a philosophy concerned with personal happiness and freedom from pain.


message 2684: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
Hmm. Can I be all three?


message 2685: by Savvy (new)

Savvy  (savvysuzdolcefarniente) | 1458 comments Of course! :-)

A gourmet cook with epicurean taste... and a gourmand's appetite!

Life is good.......


message 2686: by Savvy (new)

Savvy  (savvysuzdolcefarniente) | 1458 comments Newengland wrote:


Today's WORDS OTD:

What is OTD?
Obsessive Twittering Disorder??? :-)



message 2687: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Words Of The Day, is all (though obsessive twittering disorder probably describes more folks these days).


message 2688: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Saw this in my reading yesterday, so thought I'd use it because it's one of those many words I see rarely and wind up looking up over and over:


sui generis (adj.) -- individual; of its own kind; unique.


Language and Grammar is a sui generis group at Goodreads enjoyed by the best minds in the business -- just ask them.


message 2689: by Summer (new)

Summer | 87 comments Omphaloskepsis [om-fuh-loh-skep-sis] –noun contemplation of one's navel as part of a mystical exercise.


message 2690: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Good one, Summer. And it's good to see your season but a few weeks away.

For El Cinco de Mayo, a little Spanish influence:

pa·chu·co

   [puh-choo-koh; Sp. pah-choo-kaw]
–noun, plural -cos  [-kohz; Sp. -kaws].
(especially among Mexican-Americans) a teenage youth who belongs to a street gang known for its flamboyant style.

Origin:
1940–45; < American Spanish (U.S. Southwest), Mexican Spanish: probably originally a resident of El Paso, equivalent to ( El ) Pas ( o ) + -uco pejorative noun suffix, with expressive replacement of s by ch; compare Mexican Spanish pachuco worthless card hand, derivative of paso pass


Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2011.



message 2691: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
Anyone who grew up in and around LA, knows pachuco, man.


message 2692: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Growing up in Connecticut... no.


message 2693: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
It's a great word to know for playing Scrabble or Bookworm.


message 2694: by Hillary (new)

Hillary | 7 comments Flat-hat--(verb) to fly low in an airplane in a reckless manner

I've never been in an airplane with someone doing this, but I thought it was interesting word anyway!


message 2695: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
"Pull 'er up, you flat-hatter!" Heard many times in the movies.


message 2696: by Hillary (new)

Hillary | 7 comments :-) I want to call someone that because it's sound so silly. It's not going to make sense though!


message 2697: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
"Make dollars, not sense," I always say.


message 2698: by Cecily (last edited Jun 09, 2011 03:08AM) (new)

Cecily | 175 comments Anna wrote: "My word for today is ha-ha."

The definition doesn't quite conjure up what it is; in particular "trench" makes it sound rather ugly, whereas it's really about beauty.

In England, you usually find them around stately homes. The house sits in formal gardens/lawns, with livestock in adjacent fields. To avoid spoiling the view with a fence or wall, the field is at a lower level, with a retaining wall as the ha-ha. It's about differential height more than digging a ditch - more like a big step than a trench. From the upper level, you don't see the wall, just an uninterrupted expanse of green.

The name allegedly comes from the reaction of onlookers when the unwary keep walking, don't notice the drop and suddenly fall out of sight!

Here's a picture of one: http://www.englishheritageprints.com/...

And here's a slightly more trench-like one: http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/63626


message 2699: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
Cecily wrote: "Anna wrote: "My word for today is ha-ha."

The definition doesn't quite conjure up what it is; in particular "trench" makes it sound rather ugly, whereas it's really about beauty.

In England, you..."


Thanks. I knew they were about not ruining the view with fences, but I'd always thought they were actual trenches.


message 2700: by Cecily (new)

Cecily | 175 comments Ruth wrote: "I knew they were about not ruining the view with fences, but I'd always thought they were actual trenches"

They can be trenches or include a trench, but in England at least, the step/terracing/retaining wall is usually the defining characteristic.


back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.