That's Normal's Boozy Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Dragonfly in Amber
Outlander Series
>
Let's talk about Outlander Book 2- Dragonfly in Amber

(I don't need to spoiler tag any of this, do I, since this is the thread for this book? I don't want to ruin anything for anyone!)
I agree you guys. I started googling the books as soon as I picked up DiA because I was so confused and heartbroken. ROGER? 1963? WHAT IN THE ACTUAL ...
Thank God that book is told in partial flashback because without the glimpses of their time in France, it would have been too painful. Of course, their time in France is painful enough. SO MANY TEARS for that book. I still remember where I was when I started reading it. (We don't have that couch anymore, SIGH).
Something about the missing 20 years STILL grates on nerves bit with refards to the series as a whole. WHY. But then, of course, Claire would not have survived Bree's birth if she hadn't been in the present. And how could she leave Jamie's child behind to be with him in the past? And how could she risk their child's life to try to take her through the stones? SO MANY FACTORS. She made the right choice. She did. IT JUST HURTS. So good.
Thank God that book is told in partial flashback because without the glimpses of their time in France, it would have been too painful. Of course, their time in France is painful enough. SO MANY TEARS for that book. I still remember where I was when I started reading it. (We don't have that couch anymore, SIGH).
Something about the missing 20 years STILL grates on nerves bit with refards to the series as a whole. WHY. But then, of course, Claire would not have survived Bree's birth if she hadn't been in the present. And how could she leave Jamie's child behind to be with him in the past? And how could she risk their child's life to try to take her through the stones? SO MANY FACTORS. She made the right choice. She did. IT JUST HURTS. So good.

Believe it or not, that wasn't the part that I felt made DiA so hard to read. It was the looming battle that kept me from reading. I know from history that the battle took place, despite their efforts to thwart it, and that SO MANY highlanders died brutally. It's no secret I get too emotionally involved with the books I read and I had a really hard time reading and connecting with characters knowing so many of them weren't going to make it :(
...onward to Voyager, my favourite book!

PS. And I love historical novels! Can't help wondering about how much of that stuff is accurate, though?
MC wrote: "I didn't like how Claire's and Frank's relationship turned out, but there's a bit more about that in Voyager. She DID go back in time to Frank, but then it seems it was just 20 wasted years for bot..."
WRT Frank and Claire: so many people live in relationships like that. He was a good father to Bree, and never REALLY judged Claire for Jamie. He was unfaithful, she was in love with someone else, but they were a partnership. I understand it, I guess.
WRT Frank and Claire: so many people live in relationships like that. He was a good father to Bree, and never REALLY judged Claire for Jamie. He was unfaithful, she was in love with someone else, but they were a partnership. I understand it, I guess.



I liked Roger, too: I guess I prefer intellectual men to brawny men and I found the geek in Roger adorable!
Another thing I started thinking about after reading Voyager: isn't the author a little too fond of wrenching Claire and Jamie apart on some dramatic misunderstanding, only to let them drift together and have sex again and make up? I feel like maybe she's jerking on my heartstrings a little bit too often, making me think that "Oh no! Now they'll never get together again!!" It's a bit soap-operatic as tricks go, don't you think?
MC wrote: "isn't the author a little too fond of wrenching Claire and Jamie apart on some dramatic misunderstanding, only to let them drift together and have sex again and make up? "
To an extent, yes. It's what makes for an interesting plot. Yanno, conflict. I think that the time period, Claire's "ability" and Jamie's position/history/etc together kind of lend themselves to drama. The author has taken other characters in the series and written about them, which shows it's not really fabricating drama for drama's sake. It's kind of a turbulent time. What makes Jamie and Claire so interesting is their devotion to one another, and how that plays out when they are ripped apart.
To an extent, yes. It's what makes for an interesting plot. Yanno, conflict. I think that the time period, Claire's "ability" and Jamie's position/history/etc together kind of lend themselves to drama. The author has taken other characters in the series and written about them, which shows it's not really fabricating drama for drama's sake. It's kind of a turbulent time. What makes Jamie and Claire so interesting is their devotion to one another, and how that plays out when they are ripped apart.

To an extent,..."
I think what I mean is not the historical twists and turns, which I appreciate, but the romantic misunderstandings, when they doubt each other and themselves. Those start feeling a bit construed by book three, after all they've been through together by then. If I say "Laoghaire in Voyager", do you get what I mean by soap-opera?

And in case anyone was confused as to whether this was a work of fiction or not: morning sickness sex? I don't think so.

Right! We know that Claire uses a twig to brush her teeth, but Jamie? Ugh. Whisky and haggis breath. (shudder)
Also, I like to pretend that I read historical fiction like this to learn about the day-to-day life in the past, especially details about brushing teeth and mending socks, because it makes me feel smarter than admitting a JAMMF obsession.

Right! We know that Claire uses a twig to brush her teeth, but Jamie? Ugh. Whisky and hagg..."
You're in a Book Club! Hey, you MUST be smart! ;)

So, when Claire forgives James so easily for beating her or when she stays with Frank although he cheats on her, I just can't relate. I understand the pragmatic arguments, but I don't believe it emotionally.
Sorry to rant. This came to me when I couldn't sleep at 3.30 am. ;-)
MC wrote: "So, when Claire forgives James so easily for beating her or when she stays with Frank although he cheats on her, I just can't relate. I understand the pragmatic arguments, but I don't believe it emotionally. "
I feel this way too, about some things that happen in later books. Emotionally, I can't relate.
I feel this way too, about some things that happen in later books. Emotionally, I can't relate.



I totally agree. It does, however make me regret re-visiting old lost favorite novels though. Sometimes I just want to leave them there as a great read in my adolescence. Such is NOT the case with this series though.
MC wrote: "jerking on my heartstrings "
i feel like she needs to write a Jamie & Claire ONLY book that is called "jerking on my heartstrings"
i feel like she needs to write a Jamie & Claire ONLY book that is called "jerking on my heartstrings"
Jenny wrote: "But I read it again 15 years later as the mom of two small children and thought "what a tragic, selfish woman." I still loved the book, but I related to it in quite a different way. "
oohh deep
oohh deep

i feel like she needs to write a Jamie & Claire ONLY book that is called "jerking on my heartstrings""
I dread the final book. Dread dread dread. Because I think in the final book Jamie will have to die and I just don't think I can live with that. So maybe when the final book is published I'll let all of you read it first. Because if Jamie dies, I think I'll just have to not read it, ever. Just yank out my heart and stomp in it. I can say that the end of this series will probably affect me like no other. I know HP was a big harry deal for lots of kids who grew up reading the series, but this one spans longer. When I started it, I was young, unmarried, and had just started college. A lot has happened to me in the last 22 years and to the characters. I can only imagine the empty space that will take up residence in my heart when this series ends.


I think it was simply that she thought there was no way he could have survived Culloden and thought there really wasn't any point in looking. I am so much more like Bree here, I'd be tearing apart the library archives looking. lol



OMGosh! Wait until you hit book 7! LOL! Without mentioning spoilers I'll just say this, the series continues as J&C get older and follows their children as well. And I can promise there is never a dull moment.
Stacey wrote: "I always wondered,if the love was so great,why did she REALLY wait so long? I imagine she was too afraid to find out he was dead.."
No no no. She *had* to wait. (view spoiler)
No no no. She *had* to wait. (view spoiler)

I had a harder time with Clare putting up with Frank than I did her getting past the beating with Jamie. I can understand her putting up with Frank because of Bree, lots of women do that. Bree thought Frank was her Father and Frank took back Clare knowing she was pregnant, she probably felt she owed him a lot. But I still found it tough to swallow.
The beating though, there is only one thing that irritated me about the beating, and that's how FAST she got over it. I know lots of people have a hard time loving a hero who can beat the leading lady but for the time period, and with what Clare did, I can understand why he did it. If something like that were to happen in this day and age I would not be understanding whatsoever. I can also understand Clare getting past it, as she was smart and adaptable to her new culture. She only had so many options. However, I was surprised at how QUICKLY she did so. Even with her understanding the culture, the men and the situation she was in, I would have thought pride might step in the way of getting over it as quickly as she did.
The other thing I found odd was Jamie giving up his right to beat her again. Yes, I found that WEIRD! From his perspective, the stunt she just pulled, the danger she placed herself in, the danger she brought to him and the group they were traveling with, I can understand Jamie feeling completely justified (for the time period) in carrying out her punishment. What I can't understand is after seeing how his wife can make such incredibly stupid decisions (from his perspective) with huge life or death consequences, he gives up his right to punish her in the way that was common back then only because she promises to listen to him in the future? What if she were to break that promise?

i feel like she needs to write a Jamie & Claire ONLY book that is called "jerking on my heartstrings""
I dread the final book. Dread dread ..."
Ahem, Jamie lived in the 18th Century. He's ALREADY dead. Sorry if this comes as a shock to you! ;-)
MC wrote: "Ahem, Jamie lived in the 18th Century. He's ALREADY dead. Sorry if this comes as a shock to you! ;-)
"
life ruiner!
"
life ruiner!

"
life ruiner!"
Yup. It's my day job. Ask my kids. ;)
Stop the press!!!!! Jamie DIED and FRANK RAISED HIS DAUGHTER???? If this iPad hadn't cost $750 I would have thrown it at the wall! Whaaaaaaaaaaaat???
I'm assuming considering there are 9 books (total) in the series- Jamie comes back somehow....... This honestly is the only reason I'm continuing.
Horrrrrrrrrified!!
I'm assuming considering there are 9 books (total) in the series- Jamie comes back somehow....... This honestly is the only reason I'm continuing.
Horrrrrrrrrified!!
I cannot IMAGINE a scenario which will make this ok in my mind! Is the tragedy supposed to elevate the (eventual- I bloody well hope) joy?
Arrrrrrggghhhhhhh!
Arrrrrrggghhhhhhh!
Christine wrote: "I cannot IMAGINE a scenario which will make this ok in my mind! Is the tragedy supposed to elevate the (eventual- I bloody well hope) joy?
Arrrrrrggghhhhhhh!"
Like I'm tearing up for you. Everything you are feeling I have felt. Just trust. There are 8 books. :)
Arrrrrrggghhhhhhh!"
Like I'm tearing up for you. Everything you are feeling I have felt. Just trust. There are 8 books. :)

I agree with Shalan's comment about the looming battle that hangs over this book.
Did everyone also suspect that Claire's first pregnancy was with Brianna? That kept throwing me off -- like when does she go back and -- there's a lot of pages for someone who needs to go back to the future in less than a few weeks.
Jenny wrote: "I'm almost done with DiA, and I think I need a break from Jamie and Claire. I've grown weary of her being the "shiny metal object" that everyone wants to rape, threatens to rape, gives rape-y looks..."
Yes, sometimes you need a break. Which is why there are 4-5 years between publications.
I thought her preg was Brianna too, and I knew the timeline didn't match up, so I was really irritated. And obviously not smart enough to figure out that she got pregnant again.
Yes, sometimes you need a break. Which is why there are 4-5 years between publications.
I thought her preg was Brianna too, and I knew the timeline didn't match up, so I was really irritated. And obviously not smart enough to figure out that she got pregnant again.
Still no resolution....... Blah blah politics......... Blah blah blah dinner parties........ All the while waiting for the death and sending back to frank.......... This is becoming a tough read...........




Dear Claire, Randall is alive. Jamie wants to kill him via a duel. Jamie deserves to kill Randall. LET HIM KILL THE SADISTIC RAPIST!!!!! Regards, frustrated by your stupidity in trying to stop him.
Arrrrrrgggggghhhhhh CLAIRE! Totally hating you right now!
REPEAT AFTER ME- FRANK IS NOT WORTH IT!!!!
I am sorely regretting reading this book on the iPad....... For perhaps the 17th time- I WANT TO THROW THE BOOK AGAINST THE WALL IN FRUSTRATION!
REPEAT AFTER ME- FRANK IS NOT WORTH IT!!!!
I am sorely regretting reading this book on the iPad....... For perhaps the 17th time- I WANT TO THROW THE BOOK AGAINST THE WALL IN FRUSTRATION!
Ok. That's it.
Don't think I can EVER forgive Claire for that.
And I'm now GLAD that she lost Jamie and got sent back to stupid Frank. She deserves every bit of heartbreak coming her way. Idiot.
Don't think I can EVER forgive Claire for that.
And I'm now GLAD that she lost Jamie and got sent back to stupid Frank. She deserves every bit of heartbreak coming her way. Idiot.

Don't think I can EVER forgive Claire for that.
And I'm now GLAD that she lost Jamie and got sent back to stupid Frank. She deserves every bit of heartbreak coming her way. Idiot."
Dear Christine, Do you now understand my comment about the author jerking on our heartstrings? Completely unnecessary and exaggerated rift between Claire and Jamie. Claire, do you not watch soap operas? You should know better!
It WAS a tough read. I DIED at the beginning. Like crying. book throwing. I was warned but still.. doesn't come close to all that actually happens. THEY ARE APART FOR 20 YEARS?
How can a love like that exist and they not get to experience it? UGH
And then all that damn history. Terrible. But Still... I liked it. But it wasn't until I started book 3 (i'm maybe 25% through) that I realized how difficult of a read it was.
Let's discuss it!