Pride and Prejudice
discussion
Which book did you enjoy more P&P or Wuthering Heights?
message 1:
by
Kayla
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 15, 2013 11:17PM

reply
|
flag


Darn it! This is almost as bad as Wuthering Heights vs. Jane Eyre!
I refuse to pick. I love them both. Wuthering Heights is in a class by itself and shouldn't be compared with any other novel.
I refuse to pick. I love them both. Wuthering Heights is in a class by itself and shouldn't be compared with any other novel.

However, for the purpose of the question, I'll say P&P hands down. I've read both numerous times. P&P always makes me happy and makes me feel good. Wuthering Heights usually gets thrown against a wall because Cathy is a spoiled brat and I hate Heathcliff. However, the only Bronte book I appreciate is Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte, so that could be my issue.

I loved the storyline of both books, but I'll go with P&P mostly because of Elizabeth, who is one of my all-time favorite characters.

Both authors give an intriguing insight into the world as they knew it but whereas one follows a clear path towards a conclusion structured by the plot the other is far more radical and challenging to the reader.
So to conclude I like both books but for different reasons making a preference between them difficult because reading either would depend on what kind of book I wanted to read when choosing between them.

That's not to say I didn't enjoy WH, I just didn't relate to the characters. Both are fantastic books.






I thought Death Comes to Pemberly was incredibly slow and not at all worthy of a follow-up to P&P. I had never read a PD James before and wondered if she is simply going off, or does she always write like that?

I refuse to pick. I love them both. Wuthering Heights is in a class by itself and shouldn't be compared with any other novel."
I agree. Judging either of these books will be totally unfair;<







I can't judge people for not liking some books i like. I simply think that Wuthering Heights' story is much darker and much more complex than Pride and Prejudice's. Some people might like WH, but my choice is P&P





I love Elizabeth Bennett's spunk. I like the sweetness of Mr. Bingley (although he's kinda spineless) and Lady Catherine's line about "If I had studied music, I should have been a great proficient" was one of the best lines to capture a personality that I've ever read.




I like the way you put that.


And...more importantly, I'll take Colin Firth over Laurence Olivier any day (and yes, I know Olivier played Darcy in the 1940 film version. Don't get me started on the anachronisms in there).

Mr. Rochester is a much easier character to sympathize with. Yeah, he pulled some dick moves, but in the end he was redeemed, I thought. Heathcliff could have had a chance at redemption; he had a tough time as a child, to be sure, but he took that and became a horrible man. In contrast, Hareton is not doomed to his fate, because he and young Catherine do seek to break that cycle of misery.


all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic