Beta Reader Group discussion
Do you mark a book "currently reading" when you beta read?
date
newest »


It is NOT advisable to manually add an unpublished book by someone else to Goodreads. A main reason is that when that happens, and then the author is ready to publish it, they cannot make ANY changes on a manually added book without having Librarian status. Then they'd have to manually add it again (and they'd have the ISBN &/or ASIN at that time along with the book cover), then there'd be two copies of the book (one without a book cover and possibly not the correct title the author wants it listed as). Then if the author wants this fixed, they'd have to find and contact a Goodreads Superlibrarian to fix that.
However, if you have a blog, and you are beta reading, your blog can be linked to Goodreads and you can mention the name of the book you are or have beta read and the author's name.

http://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/n...
My favorite one for entertainment's sake:
World After
Am I missing something?

The book I am currently beta reading has a listing on Goodreads (created by the author, not a manual add by a fan) but hasn't been released to the public for purchase yet.

The book I am currently beta reading has a listing on Goodreads (created by the author, not a m..."
If that's the case, then there shouldn't be any reason why you couldn't put it on your reading shelf.
[In the past, I've seen where other people have added an author's book before it was published and the author didn't have it on Goodreads yet. That creates a problem the author doesn't need.]


to be honest they are doing us a favour in checking for mistakes, it is up to them if they want to keep what they are reading private.



It's ok to ask a BETA to add a review. I would be sure that you have them give you input prior to the review. I won't put a review up until the book is in it's final stages because story lines change. I do like to make sure I read the final draft before I put up a review so it is a fair review. I sometimes worry that the author doesn't want me to give a review until the book is announced for publication. I try to be sensitive to that.

Otherwise my yearly reading target just missed out.



As for creating a book, I always add my books to Goodreads database. You can never have enough promotion for a book and the sooner I can get eyeballs on a book I'm planning to release, the better.
The issue of rating a book that is a WIP can be problematic. I assume that the author is going to use my recomendations or any other he or she gets to improve their book. So if I choose to rate that book, I feel I have an obligation to include a brief comment in the review section that I read a beta version of the book that way other readers can see that I had access to an early edition that may or may not reflect the final contents. But overall, it's probably not fair to rate a book that's still a WIP because it's gives the false impression that you've read the same book that readers are going to have access to, when in actuality you haven't. ARC copies, yes. Books in beta, no.



It could be useful to folks new to Beta reading, or authors seeking readers. (I'm still pretty clueless and would love the glean some tips from those in-the-know.)
http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1...



Trade publishers usually send out ARCS 6-12 months before a book's release.

What about self-published ARCs? Is there a best practices timeline for those?

What about self-published ARCs? Is there a best practices timeline for those?"
Sure. Personally, I like to start sending out "Uncorrected ARCS" as early as 3 months before my book's release (just like the trade pubs). That way, I can start getting book reviews as a part of my book's pre-release hype, especially here on Goodreads. Once my book is professionally edited and formatted, then I start issuing regular (corrected/edited) ARCS to bloggers and book reviewers.
I also recommend that authors sending out ARCS request a specific time-frame as to when they would like reviewers/bloggers to start posting early reviews of their book. The ideal time for reviews to start showing up on blogs for an unreleased book is (as you mentioned earlier) during the final two weeks leading up to its publication. That makes it easier to build up anticipation in readers about your book's release without them forgetting about it.
The third thing I suggest is that authors kindly ask reviewers to post their reviews on Amazon and other online bookstores on the first day of your book's release. In the case of Amazon, their algorithms are set up to give your book the most visibility during the first 30 days of its release. It's best to have as many reviews during those 30 days to ride the electronic wave Amazon gives you.

What kind of book do you have to beta read? I have a historical fantasy. If you have any genre (not lit or sex) we can swap.

It's a YA novel about a rising college freshman who gets the chance to work for her favorite musician. Sounds cliched, but the feedback I've gotten so far has been good. It has romantic elements (attraction between the main characters) but nothing beyond a kiss.
Here is the link to the GR page:A Million Miles Away
Thanks for your interest. I like historical novels and would be willing to give a fantasy a serious look.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Million Miles Away (other topics)World After (other topics)
When you BR, do you put the book on your Currently Reading shelf, or do you find there are reasons to not do so (for the author's sake or your own)?
For example, having the book on some currently-reading shelves could increase visibility and reader anticipation for the book, but it could also confuse people who see it is not available but is being read by someone. I am sure there are more reasons either way...