A Child Called "It"
discussion
What is the author trying to get across?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kiana
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jun 12, 2013 02:44PM

reply
|
flag

I find the entire system failed him in a huge way.
I'm also thinking he deals with his past issues on a daily basis

I think he was unfortunate to live in a time when abuse was not as popular topic as today
Shari I did not know there was a book by his brother. Will look into it. Thank you for mentioning it.


I'm always surprised when people can talk and write about this things.
I was just thinking last night that a parent doesn't need to use words or fists to scare the sh*t out of a child. A lot of child abuse is invisible.
\Off-topic:
P.S. Are you going to publish the book? I see the preface is on GR. You can add an entry of the book and apply for author's profile. Then you can upload excerpt or the book it self if you wish


You need to add the book first I think but I might be wrong. Just add an entry and apply from the profile. Approval takes 2 working days
http://www.goodreads.com/book/new



However there could be a lot of opinions on what the point of this story was, or what the author was trying to get across. That, however, is up to your personal opinion. Some people may believe he was just telling his own story while others may believe it is a story telling how bad abuse can get and how wrong it is. It may be there to give you an idea on how the victim feels about the abuse, however some could argue by saying it is simply there to give you life experience of your own. There are many possibilities as you can see, however none of them are particularly wrong or right. As I said, it depends on your personal opinion.

It also says to me, we tend to turn a blind eye and refuse to accept what your seeing is worse case senerio.


what you think. www.authorcarolstaff.net

I think he's trying to prove sevrel points. First, he's trying to say that child abuse is wrong. Second, he's saying that you should not keep it a secret if it is happening to you. otherwise it'll get worse. And with his third book, he is trying to say that you can make it through. You just have to be brave.




I find the entire system failed him in a huge way.
I'm also thinking he deals with his past issues on a daily basis"
What is his brother's name?


In ''The Pencil Case'', I tell my husband's story of being stolen from his family, incarcerated, and abused in institutions, then denied the right to choose his own path as an adult and kept effectively ''incarcerated'' for another 8 years, before being thrust into a world he couldn't cope with after years of institutionalization and abuse.
Writing the story served multiple purposes, and I suspect the same is true of ''A Child Called It''. Firstly, and most importantly I think, it was cathartic. My husband wanted his story told. He wanted people to know what was done to children like him, and to know about the effects of it. But until I started to write, he had kept most of it a deep, dark secret. Letting it out helped the healing process. Telling the story is therapeutic, and it really assists healing when readers let him know that they care - when people show empathy.
The second objective was to create awareness, so that - hopefully - this kind of crime is stopped. The more people who are aware of the crime and of the damage it causes, the less likely it is that it will be repeated (hopefully!). While ''A Child Called It'' addresses certain failures in the child welfare system, and abuse by a child's own mother, ''The Pencil Case'' focuses on bureaucratic bungling and corruption that led to tens of thousands of children being deprived of the love of family - and goes on to expose the flawed system and heartless cruelty that destroyed so many of those children.
Thirdly, the story was intended to inspire - to show the strength of the human spirit and the amazing power of family love, and hopefully to impart some of the wisdom that enabled Paul Wilson to survive and build a life for himself, and his shattered parents to endure the heartbreak and destruction of soul that they suffered for being poor and powerless in an uncaring world.
And yes, these stories are written to help others who suffered - to show them that they are not alone, and hopefully to encourage them to speak out. Paul Wilson suffered needlessly in adulthood because he was trained never to cry for help - to be ashamed of his past and keep it secret. Today, so many who knew him when he was a young adult say ''I wish I'd known. I could have helped''.
Hopefully his story, and others like it, will shine a light that will enable sufferers to speak up and ask for help, and the world to recognize the signs of suffering and extend a helping hand.
Finally, one of my objectives in writing ''The Pencil Case'', and the specific purpose of the later chapters that some have criticized, was to show that the suffering doesn't end. Those who suffer abuse, deprivation of love, and deprivation of opportunity as children endure pain all their lives, and pass on pain to their children by their inability to parent effectively, because they were denied a good model of parenting. The cycle can only stop when society recognizes that this is not a problem of history that has been addressed. This is a problem of damaged people who need help NOW. Governments in Australia have turned a blind eye. They have apologized, but they regard changing the system as a remedy. It isn't enough. The victims of that flawed system are still suffering, and still in desperate need of recognition and help. I hoped the story I wrote might open some eyes to that need.

In ''The Pencil Case'', I tell my husband's story of being stolen from his family, incarcerated, and abused in institutions, then ..."
Lorraine is completely correct. Though not at the level her husband experienced, I can relate. As a child or young person you develop coping habits, habits that might seem odd or off-putting later in life, such as being a 'loner'. Though over time you learn to recognize and adjust, it never really goes away completely.


One of my husband's friends was abandoned by his mother. She had more than a dozen children and left them all at the hospital as tiny babies. Another of his friends was put into a home by his parents because he had cerebral palsy - he was 'flawed'.
In some cases, tragedy causes PDs that lead mothers to abuse their children. I know of a case where a mother hated her baby because the father died shortly after the child was born and the mother felt trapped as a widow and single mother. Without the baby, she could have gone back to a gay single life. The child was repeatedly 'punished' for destroying the mother's life. Deep down, the mother loved her child, but she frequently lost perspective and the ability to cope, and lashed out at the child.
It seems incomprehensible to me that any mother could carry a child and not love it and want to protect it, but we are not all made the same. It seems equally incomprehensible to me that nuns could abuse innocent little children and destroy them emotionally, or that priests could use small boys for sex - but they did!
I'll look for more stories about David, because I'd be interested to know if there was a specific trigger that caused his mother to be abusive.

http://291888.blogspot.com/
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic