Review Group discussion

18 views
General discussion > BBC discussion about grammar

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jay (last edited May 13, 2013 12:00PM) (new)

Jay Howard (jay_howard) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22...

I do insist on good grammar, both in the fiction I read for enjoyment and the material I plough through at work. I don't think that makes me an intellectual snob, just someone who loves our language and cherishes clarity and richness in the things I read. I'm not averse to the language being modified to meet everyday needs, and appropriate use in context. Dead languages don't change and I don't want English to die. Just don't mangle it.

What do you think?


message 2: by L.A. (new)

L.A. Parker (lafp) | 9 comments Uh oh!


message 3: by Theresa (new)

Theresa Nash (theresa_nash) | 21 comments If only it were genetic. One daughter gets it, the other mangles it (but she has the sense to ask me to proof anything 'official'). They both, however, poke fun when I insist on using 'real' words instead of text-speak!


message 4: by L.A. (new)

L.A. Parker (lafp) | 9 comments At times the art is in breaking the rules. But I am all for having my work be the best it can be, taking into consideration the fallible human creating it.


message 5: by Jay (new)

Jay Howard (jay_howard) Well said, Ali:) It's no good haphazardly breaking the rules by accident: there must be a purpose behind doing so, and for that to be the case you must understand what rule you are breaking and why.


back to top