The Perks Of Being A Book Addict discussion
How is a good book defined?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Supreeth
(new)
Apr 26, 2013 04:52AM

reply
|
flag



U would know that you ve read a goid book if it lingers in your mind long after you finished it

For me personally I'd define a really good book as one that stays with me long after I've read it. One that makes me see things in a different light. The books I like best are ones I see myself in, when I'm reading them I think, 'wow, they think the same way I do!'.




So, given a choice between two books, one of which is popular, and the other more critically acclaimed, which one would you choose?



I also like books that are easy to read, with a gripping, believable plot. A good example of a book that does always follow this is the Game of Thrones series. I honestly think GRRM has written ingenious characters, but sometimes the books are so difficult to read that he just loses me.

It is the little details that do it, make the people and the situation real.
It doesn't matter of it is Shakespere or EL James or anything in between.
If you are talking poetry then it is the love of language that you get from the poet that does it for me. Either effervesing in description or paired back- just to get the feel of their rhytham of speech.




The characters need to be engaging; seemingly real people that one can care about.
Another valid point is that the author needs to mastered the talent of word usage as a tool of evocation. The sense of the reader 'being there' is all-important.

I love a great story! I don't worry much about typos and grammar flaws because auto correct is evil. It happens to even the Already established successful with a publisher writers so it's bound to happen with a self publishing author. If I NEED to know what happens next it's a good read!

I think a good book can be defined by the relationship the reader has with it, some books will not provoke a response whilst others will reach out into the reader's very soul.



like the hunger games. us fans never have to define how good the book is to each other.




Yes, no doubt about it. To go into a book and see the people, actually interact with them and sit along side them as the story plays out. I agree about Mr. Darcy!!! And the times of F. Scott Fitzgerald!!! Dashielle Hammett!!! And I would love to meet some of these detectives from old fiction.
And when it comes to some non-fiction, especially history, I would love to meet some of the people from the past; Elizabeth I, Eleanor of Acquitaine, Cleopatra and many others. Probably would rather be invisible because some of these people had really bad tempers!!!! It would not take much to tick them off.
Also Jim Butcher's The Dresden Files and Simon Green's The Nightside. Interesting to visit through reading.
While we can all travel in the real and physical world, reading allows travel anywhere and any time. It can also help reduce stress and let us see other realities when that is what we need.

It doesn't matter for me if it's paranormal or contemporary, I need real emotions from the characters. I need to see background motivation for their deeds, their words. I want them to stay in characters, see authentic dialogues from them. I like when there's no black and white, and the main character has flaws, as well as the antagonist has redeeming qualities or at least understandable and not only shallow reasons.
I like a nice pace, not too fast, not too slow, but a page turner. I like if the writing style is appropriate for the type of the book - I don't like it when a chick lit or average crime story book wants to show itself to be high literature just by using superfluous and pretentious phrases, when it's not.
For me, I don't have to identify with any characters to read a good book, but in that case, the book should say something deep about society, relationships or human nature.
