THE Group for Authors! discussion

This topic is about
Matt Drabble
Writer's Circle
>
Getting the "right" readers to read my work

"Ugh, I hate books about vampires..."
Or, my FAVORITE (on a John Green novel): "Was a cancer book John's story to tell?" (Was it YOURS? Then why aren't YOU telling it?!)
Anyway. A quick glance through the poor ratings will always give me a good grasp of whether or not the people who rated it thus were idiots, and I simply disregard their opinion.
You can't stop people from rating/reviewing this way, just part of the gig, I guess. :)

But once the book is really out in the world, I agree with AK. People will buy it if they feel like it and review it if they feel like it. You can't control everything! The more people who buy it, the more reviews you'll get, and the more bad reviews you'll get (along with the good).

70 reviews for 16,000 downloads is actually very good. One of my books was downloaded around 10,000 times on Amazon when it was free, and I only got 1 review on Amazon out of that. It was rated and reviewed a little more on other websites where it was free, but if you've got 70 Amazon reviews that's great! That's really impressive, and of course you'll get some negative reviews in that. I wouldn't look at it as not enough reviews, as it seems quite a lot, especially if it's only been a few months. A lot of people will download a free book and not read it, so at least people are reading your book :)

Congratulations to you, and if what you're talking about is your only kerfluffle, then fantastic!
------
Now to the question in general, I have a more challenging facet as my anthology includes several distinct and differing genres (intentionally as I wrote it) within it, and it does offer me woes figuring out how to classify it. On amazon, I could only choose a few categories, so defaulted to "fantasy, short story and science fiction"
I'm in the opposite conundrum, not of discouraging "wrong" readers to find my book, but to let potential readers know there's probably something in there for them, regardless of their interests.
What I have done, is attempted to join groups that seem to help, like
"Chaos Reading" for eclectic interests, and fantasy groups because that's the best, although somewhat ill fitting category to place it under.
Matt, I would continue to do things like that, try to find groups that seem close to what you've written, and don't sweat the small stuff at this point.
Keep in mind, this comes from a new author with only 4 ratings and 15,950 less sales than you. So take it with a grain of salt. I may know exactly nothing.
:)


Here on goodreads, make sure your book is in desired genre(s) by shelving appropriately yourself (genre names are also sourced from a selection of shelf names; does take at least two people shelving to see "genre" instead of Top Shelves on your book's page and can be very slow for the goodreads cache to catchup once you do have the shelves).
Looks like Matt has only one of his books on his horror shelf, Gated, and it is showing Genre as Horror on the book page (righthand column towards the fold). Readers also added to a "Thriller" shelf so showing in that genre as well. There's also a "genre" field in the metadata section although I'm not completely sure that does anything except for the recommendation engine goodreads uses.

Hannah, oh the horror! Many, many, of you - I agree... I wonder about the near 1k copies of my book out there. It's like having a kid kidnapped and never getting a ransom note. ;D I hope you have the time to get them read. And, I hope there all good reads.

Can't speak for other people, but I will download many free reads to my kindle. Some may be wallflowers, waiting their turn. And since I'm very eclectic, It will depend on my mood as to which genre or book attracts me next. This is NO reflection on the books, as I read a lot and will get to them eventually (probably, unless I don't like the beginning couple of chapters).
I have reviewed a book that I added to my kindle over 6 months prior. Now that I'm an author, I agree that can be maddening, but as a reader, this is just how I read with the free time I have. It was much worse before I had a kindle. LOL.

:)


Basic plot synopsis: lesbian governess falls in love with her (fifteen, then sixteen) year old charge. They embark on a thoroughly unhealthy relationship which destroys them- a situation that isn't helped by the fact the charge also likes men. I clearly state that the governess becomes obsessed and the book has lesbian themes. I don't shy away from the girl's youth- why would an adult need a governess?
What confounds me is how many people seem to overlook these points! I don't mind the reviewer who said she didn't like the thought of young characters being sexually active- everybody has something that makes them uncomfortable, though I do wonder why she picked up the book in the first place. What I don't understand is people saying they didn't notice it was a gay story, when it's right there on the page, or "I don't like f/f!" Why waste time reading something you're not going to enjoy?
The only thing I can think of is my inclusion of the word 'erotica'. I did that to warn there was some sexual content, so readers who are offended by that sort of thing don't buy. Thanks to the 50 Shades boom, I'm worried that readers might come to it expecting something similar.
I must say, Matt- you've been very lucky so far. My reviews worldwide come to about fourteen, hence my concern. If you've 70 or so reviews, bad ones can be discounted, but if you've only a handful and a sizeable chunk of those seem to be from the wrong reader, it can have a horrible effect on your sales.
Matt wrote: "how can I stop non fans of my genre from reading and then reviewing my books when they don't even like the genre."
I never commented on the opening post, but I think that's not how you should be looking at things. Once you put your book up for sale it's out of your hands - you've a released a product, and people can do what they want with it. I understand feeling a personal attachment to our books, paying attention to every review, but really readers can do what they like. The only thing you can do is make your blurb as clear as you can, and if you've done that that's it.
If people were saying: "I didn't realize this was horror from the blurb and I was offended by the violence," that's one thing - you'd change the blurb. But someone can watch a horror movie and write a review saying they hated it because they hate horror movies. It's people's right. All you can do is write the best book you can, put it out there, and hope people like it. It's okay if people don't.
I never commented on the opening post, but I think that's not how you should be looking at things. Once you put your book up for sale it's out of your hands - you've a released a product, and people can do what they want with it. I understand feeling a personal attachment to our books, paying attention to every review, but really readers can do what they like. The only thing you can do is make your blurb as clear as you can, and if you've done that that's it.
If people were saying: "I didn't realize this was horror from the blurb and I was offended by the violence," that's one thing - you'd change the blurb. But someone can watch a horror movie and write a review saying they hated it because they hate horror movies. It's people's right. All you can do is write the best book you can, put it out there, and hope people like it. It's okay if people don't.
Rachael wrote: "I'm glad it's not just me experiencing this problem! My book, The Governess, is proving hugely divisive. The people that like it give it five or four star reviews; the others give it two (and in on..."
I don't want to be rude but to be honest I don't think your blurb is all that clear. It says:
"An erotic thriller set in Victorian England. Miss Benson, a governess, is sent to teach Amy how to be a lady. Amy is discovering the joys of sex and suitors. Miss Benson's unconventional methods lead to scandal, heartbreak and murder as she becomes obsessed with her young charge."
Amy discovering the joys of sex doesn't say clearly that she's having sex with her governess. The next sentence doesn't clearly say that they're in a relationship - the governess could be obsessed with her charge but not in a sexual relationship with her. I'm not saying the book is bad, and the premise is actually something I think people would really like, but the blurb is extremely vague. I'm not surprised people don't realize it's a gay story. Miss Benson's unconventional methods doesn't really say anything at all. I'd really look at expanding the blurb a little to make it more obvious, even if it pains you to do so. Of course you can ignore me :)
I don't want to be rude but to be honest I don't think your blurb is all that clear. It says:
"An erotic thriller set in Victorian England. Miss Benson, a governess, is sent to teach Amy how to be a lady. Amy is discovering the joys of sex and suitors. Miss Benson's unconventional methods lead to scandal, heartbreak and murder as she becomes obsessed with her young charge."
Amy discovering the joys of sex doesn't say clearly that she's having sex with her governess. The next sentence doesn't clearly say that they're in a relationship - the governess could be obsessed with her charge but not in a sexual relationship with her. I'm not saying the book is bad, and the premise is actually something I think people would really like, but the blurb is extremely vague. I'm not surprised people don't realize it's a gay story. Miss Benson's unconventional methods doesn't really say anything at all. I'd really look at expanding the blurb a little to make it more obvious, even if it pains you to do so. Of course you can ignore me :)

I would LOVE to offer it for free just to have people read ONLY on smashwords but woe is me I get reader sets price and it gets lost amongst the crowd even then.
It is very disheartening but like the other person said, if its out there work with what you got and keep going. I for one, realize that at some point I'm going to have to stop marketing as much and finish the darn next one in the series.
Where are the genre's of old? It was much easier when I started writing. And I'm not ancient.....at least not that I think of. My bones don't feel so dry yet.
It is out in paperback in amazon though, so that's decent.
Anybody know a good place to check out that is of vampire nature but not sparkly or full of teenage angst? Somewhere where the woman kicks butt and, although falls in love, is the big champion in the end? I kill off a lot of people too cause I like that. A lot. Great stress reducer ;) So it's actually a cross breed of Underworld movie action, Anne Rice fittings of vamp lore, with a big Fire & Ice feel to it. hahahahahaa, what genre does that go in? Too many darn genre's and not enough readers want to go outside of what they know.
Sorry for the ramble......reminder, coffee BEFORE goodreads

Matt wrote: "One of my HUGE annoyances at the minute is the genre categories over at Amazon. I have stuck with them and their KDP program as my third attempt at a novel "Gated" did really good numbers on the fr..."
Speaking as someone who generally sells a whole lot of nothing most of the time - even if people seem interested in my books - I think if you're selling a fair bit every day that's great. Maybe try to look at the positive. Did you sell nothing in the beginning? Do you remember what that felt like? It's terrible, so rather than becoming upset over what's going wrong, maybe be overjoyed you're actually selling a lot. Because most of us don't, despite trying really hard.
Speaking as someone who generally sells a whole lot of nothing most of the time - even if people seem interested in my books - I think if you're selling a fair bit every day that's great. Maybe try to look at the positive. Did you sell nothing in the beginning? Do you remember what that felt like? It's terrible, so rather than becoming upset over what's going wrong, maybe be overjoyed you're actually selling a lot. Because most of us don't, despite trying really hard.

Ok, I'm just getting this weird feeling. I could be completely off base, but I'm starting to wonder if this isn't a sort of backhanded marketing ploy on your part. You keep saying things are difficult for you, but then you follow that with posting super numbers, how well the book is really doing, how highly it is ranked.
It's a head scratcher. You seem to be making contradictory arguments: The system is gamed against you & you're doing really successfully in the system.
If I'm wrong, I apologize.


This being my first published book, it's very much a learning curve. If it doesn't easily fit into a category, it's tricky to market. Another issue could be overfamilarity with old lesbian titles and Sarah Waters novels; if you know the "code", certain phrases equal gay goings on, but perhaps they don't mean much to the straight reader. I'll have a think and see if there's a way of making it clearer.

Believe me I am nowhere in the grand scheme of authors and success stories. I am bashing my head against against a brick wall in trying to literary agents to even bother reading my submissions. There are plenty of charts that do not require high download numbers to register on them. And just exactly who would I be marketing to? This is a thread for authors to give help, thoughts and opinions.
Matt wrote: "My first two books disapeared without a trace so I am very well aware of what it's like, but I do not want to waste any tiny crack in the door to move forward. The quickest thing that you find is n..."
I understand it is stressful, and you're right - getting noticed is half the battle. I had a few weeks of good sales last year after a good free run, but it petered away after a while and made me quite sad. I guess you want to hold onto the success as much as you can and propel it into ongoing sales. From the point of view of those of us who aren't selling, though, all I can think is, "OMG he's selling so much!" But it is hard :)
I understand it is stressful, and you're right - getting noticed is half the battle. I had a few weeks of good sales last year after a good free run, but it petered away after a while and made me quite sad. I guess you want to hold onto the success as much as you can and propel it into ongoing sales. From the point of view of those of us who aren't selling, though, all I can think is, "OMG he's selling so much!" But it is hard :)
Rachael wrote: "Re: Mona- No offence taken. I was going by the Amazon tags- its chief tag is 'Lesbian', though it's also down as 'Historical' and 'Erotica'. Perhaps when people come across it, they've used one of ..."
I wouldn't want you to go against the way books in your genre are typically described, but yes, to the straight reader the blurb seems vague. I think it would only take a mild change to what you have, and maybe a couple of extra sentences to make it clearer. It might seem like dumbing it down, and it probably is, but I think it would help. I wouldn't want you to lose potential readers because they don't know what the story is about, or alienate readers who didn't want a lesbian story :)
I wouldn't want you to go against the way books in your genre are typically described, but yes, to the straight reader the blurb seems vague. I think it would only take a mild change to what you have, and maybe a couple of extra sentences to make it clearer. It might seem like dumbing it down, and it probably is, but I think it would help. I wouldn't want you to lose potential readers because they don't know what the story is about, or alienate readers who didn't want a lesbian story :)

well, like I said, I could be (and was) wrong.


Apologies if I sounded snappy, long day!!

none needed. I was the one speculating out of line. ;)


I agree there is little preparation from Amazon for understanding marketing, or even the best ways to utilize KDP select for example, but I think the reviews are just what they are. If we aren't prepared for them, or we are prepared for them, it really doesn't matter. They will be whatever they will be.

On goodreads, you have not "tagged" (that is, shelved) as anything much less assigned a genre. That might help you here with the browsing goodreads members.
On your author profile, you can also say what genres you normally write in (doesn't set a genre for any book but does show on your author profile). If you don't like the few sample genres, click "other" and put whatever you like.
Take a look at the meta data for your book, too, to see what's there. (Under "edit details" there's the normal edit screen and a "show metadata" tab to click. Right now you have no meta data answers, including genre. ) I say that without completely understanding how goodreads uses meta data (do know it is used somehow in the recommendations engine; no clue how many potential readers even know it's there or add metadata answers themselves ).



I've learnt it's something that you can't control. That's life.


Has anyone used www.authormarketingclub.com? There's one section where they invite you to upload your manuscript so people interested in reviewing it can download it - but then stipulates that readers are under no obligation to review your book.
The first alarm bells went off when I read that they want you to upload your manuscript. Hmmm.


I might of been born at night, but I wasn't born last night...

Maybe there is the possibility to upload an excerpt or the first chapter.

the right reader is the one that enjoys your work


um, not what i meant. I wasn't meaning restrict anyone reading (?!) I meant those that enjoy it, are the wonderful people that the book is meant for. More of a connection between artist and audience. I was responding to the idea that anyone who buys it is the right reader, but I think I don't care if they borrow it or get it for free, if they enjoyed what I created, then they are the right audience.
not sure if I explained it any better, but there you go.


I think as has been proven from many comments about the free give-a-way here and on Amazon, free does not equal an increase in sales, or reviews for most writers. So to me, the perfect reader will be the one that BUYS my work.
After all, if they buy my book, they must have a reason. Maybe the blurb intrigued them. Maybe they read a sample and found the story and writing fit their likes. Most readers are not going to buy a book if the story or style is one they dislike...
My books are in the horror genre and clearly state as much with the synopsis and the covers. Yet I have had several reviewers leave only average marks because they don't like horror books! One novel uses the line in the synopsis of "Gangsters and vampires" and yet one reviewer started their review stating that they didn't like mob books or vampire books and thus gave it a poor rating.
I fully expect to receive comstructive criticism but how can I stop non fans of my genre from reading and then reviewing my books when they don't even like the genre.