Night of Knives
discussion
Should you read Steven Erikson, series first?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jared
(new)
Mar 17, 2013 09:10PM

reply
|
flag

Also, it must be said that Erikson is a much better writer in general than Esslemont is. Esslemont is to Erikson what Brian Herbert is to Frank. It's still good...just not as good.

Also the Esslemont books are an ongoing series as well.with a total of six books planned for publishing.
The 2 authors definetely took a divide of the characters. Esslemont created his own cast of characters. I think it's safe to say you could enjoy and comprehend the Esslemont series easily if you read it first.
for a chronological listing check out www.malazanempire.com


Both series have books in them that complement and gleam you more information about characters and some of the books in both can be read as stand alone - more with Ian's that Stevens, but both complement what is happening.
I found NOK very interesting when I first read it after reading the first 4 or 5 malazan books and it gives a lot of insight about some of the characters that are in these first books.
Also Ian C. Esselemont is up to five books into his series atm: Knight of Knives; Return of the Crimson Guard; Stonewielder; Orb and Throne; Blood and Bone. So already a big slice of books to read in his series.
Definetly worth reading them all if you have the time.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic