“The issue for me as a writer is not why they changed it, but that they are changing the contracts,” Scalzi told Wired.
“Is it that they were clueless when they wrote the initial contracts and then, when someone pointed it out, they fixed it, or whether they were embarrassed in the media? The short answer is, I don’t care.
Are they changing the contracts to make them more equitable to authors? If so, then I am very happy that they’re doing that and I will continue to point out where things could be improved in future.”
Back on topic, I was following this on Scalzi's blog. I'm glad they changed their mind, I hope they've learned a lesson...sadly, even if they did, it's probably not the right lesson.
Flagging a post will send it to the Goodreads Customer Care team for review.
We take abuse seriously in our discussion boards.
Only flag comments that clearly need our attention.
As a general rule we do not censor any content on the site.
The only content we will consider removing is spam,
slanderous attacks on other members,
or extremely offensive content (eg. pornography, pro-Nazi, child abuse, etc).
We will not remove any content for bad language alone, or being critical
of a particular book.
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2013/0...
Oh and the best part is Scalzi's quote: