Complaint Department discussion
POST COMPLAINTS HERE

:(



Son and family, got to babysit the little one. They grow fast. He's chasing the dogs and trying to get into everything. It's never walking. He does wear old grandma out!


In the past I've gotten away with using goodreads (dot) com and Amazon let's it go through and the readers understand that it means goodreads.com
Although in this case it would be something like:
goodreads (dot) com/topic/show/1514356-love-has-no-boundaries---anthology-volume-1
Except the link for downloading volume one is broken.

Son and family, got to babysit the little one. They grow fast. He's chasing the dogs and trying to get into everything. It's never walking. He..."
An extremely attractive family! The most handsome dad in the world and his pretty wife. From the photo it looks like it takes both of them to hold your grandson to keep him from running out of the picture :-) He's beautiful of course.
Thanks for keeping us up to date Tj. It's amazing to see how fast he's grown. (Also I always appreciate a new view of your super sexy son.)
Hugs, Preston

Son and family, got to babysit the little one. They grow fast. He's chasing the dogs and trying to get into everything. It's never walking. He..."
Hi Tj so great to hear from you! Thanks for the photo of your son and his family. They are all gorgeous!
Hugs, Boyd

And you move sooooooooooo fast when you're on that slide.
I should know.
>g<




Welcome Byron! We're a friendly bunch, don't be afraid to post anything here. I, too, suffer from a bit of social anxiety and it's a frustrating thing to deal with, but Preston, Boyd, Roger, Averin, Monika, Michael, Ije, and everyone else here are fun to talk to and love welcoming new people.
Sometimes if you just play one of the word games in the Games section, you'll find yourself relaxing into the banter there. Or you can get into to one of the discussions too. We don't bite (though we do get a little goofy sometimes ....


There are a number of supportive groups on GR for writing, the M/M group's annual event is going on now. Sometimes people have to give up on prompts and they re-open (3 this week), so if that is an area you are interested in, keep an eye out.



Actually, there is such a setting. I am most assuredly not a GR expert, and have only a limited knowledge of how it functions, but I finally did figure this one out. Below the last post you'll see "You are following this discussion" with words in parentheses immediately after...at least that's what mine shows. Next to it is "edit." Click that and a pop-up window, uh, pops up.
There are 5 options ranging from digests to no notices at all. One of them will send you an email, but then no more unless you visit that page again. So if you get an email from one of those groups, don't go there and you should stop getting emails.
Or you can click none and get nothing at all. So I'm guessing you could do that with all the threads you don't care about and that should stop them.
On the threads I like (like this one) I just have it set so that I get notified about all the comments, and I look at them in gmail and decide whether to go to the thread/discussion to read, or just delete the email.
Hope this helps.
Eric

Firts of all , thank you Eric , now let me explain to you what's my problem :
yes i know under this discussions space there is this note that says (You are following all discussions for this group (notify only) edit) but , the option you suggested concernse E-Mails & those i am not interested in , i only want Notifications , so i set all the E-Mails OFF & now i get only Notifications , but the problem is , Goodreads gives you all or nothing , example , i got notified when you responded to my question/complaint right? but i'll also get notified if someone else posted or responded to another question here even if it doesn't concern me!
& lets say that's ok , now how can i chose which discussions i'll get notified on , why they have to be all or none!!!?


Mortimer Forest and Ludlow from Gravel Hill, Shropshire, UK

We have expected high of 100ºF or 38ºC. Winds 25 to 35 mph, with gusts up to 65 mph=fires to the east and south.




The San Diego University main website and the Emergency webpage both say commencement will take place.
The latest Emergency information on the University site at 2:00 pm Pacific Time says, "The San Diego State University campus is not in the path of the current fires in San Diego. The following links can provide information and updates about the fire, its location and resources for those who may be impacted.
Campus currently remains open and SDSU's Commencement ceremonies, May 15 through 18, will continue as planned."
Of course this might not be the most current information if you were told to evacuate 6 hours ago.
Congratulations on your graduation!

"CSUSM Remains Closed, Updates to Follow Later Today
We are dealing with the impacts of the fire in priority order. The safety of our campus community is our first priority. We will be issuing a statement later today regarding commencement and our campus."


I have seen in stories, heard on programmes, the phrase "going to hospital," where we would say "going to the hospital."
So the question is, what's the proper usage in this situation?
Here, we would say, "We went there on September 19th," or "We went there on the 19th of September."
Is the British usage "We went there on 19th September?"
Or what?
I have a couple of "date" sentences like that in a Regency MM romance I'm just completing, called The Rake, the Rogue and the Roue. The last usage "feels" right, but I might as well get it correct.
And yes, I fully recognize 199 years have passed since the time of the novel, but I figure this kind of phrasing has probably not changed.
Help, anyone?
Thanks.
Eric

I have seen in stories, heard on programmes, the phrase "going to hospital," where we would say "going to the hospital."
So the question is, what's the proper usage in this situation?
Here, we would say, "We went there on September 19th," or "We went there on the 19th of September."
Is the British usage "We went there on 19th September?"
Or what?
I have a couple of "date" sentences like that in a Regency MM romance novel I'm just completing, called The Rake, the Rogue and the Roue. The last usage "feels" right, but I might as well get it correct.
And yes, I fully recognize 199 years have passed since the time of the novel, but I figure this kind of phrasing has probably not changed.
Help, anyone?
Thanks.
Eric

Thanks, TJ, best to your sister and hope you are well.

I have seen in stories, heard on programmes, the phrase "going to hospital," where we would say ..."
In Britain I would only add the definite article if I were referring to a specific hospital. For instance Ludlow has a small hospital so if what need examining was beyond its capability I would tell someone, "I'm going to the Royal Free Hospital," or "I'm going to the hospital in Hereford" that is making it a distinct hospital as against any old hospital.
On the other hand, if it was one visit of a sequence, I'd say, "I'll be going to hospital this afternoon." And if it was a sentence which was intended as a generality, there would be no use of "the" — "I've had this sore toe for an age now and I think I'll have to go to hospital to have it seen to."
Date usage: In the USA dates are almost always given as MM/DD/YYYY, in Britain it's always the opposite: DD/MM/YYYY, which means we don't need a comma to separate the figures for the day and the year like you do — September 19 1999, doesn't really work, while September 19, 1999 does. In Britain 19 September 1999 reads fine sans comma.
So "We went there on 19th September" is British usage, although in this case we might add a "the" before "19th" (or more commonly these days, simply "19 September 1895".

I have seen in stories, heard on programmes, the phrase "going to hospital," where ..."
Thanks!!!

I've also noticed that Brits often don't use the subjunctive although folks in the Colonies do.
Brad

I have seen in stories, heard on programmes, the phrase "going to hospital," where ..."
p.s. Sorry for the abrupt (though grateful) response.
Though I am American I have for most of my life used the British version of dates for things that I do personally, though I must conform for things written professionally.
The Rake, The Rogue and the Roue (an accented "e" there I don't know how to do here) is set in 1815-1816. And while I'm not trying to do a Georgette Heyer style of Regency with in-depth details of fashion, food, what-have-you, I am trying to give the flavor (flavour >s<) of the period, with period expressions in both dialogue and narrative. I think "We went there on 19th September" works/"sounds" better in the context of period "flavor." And I'll probably have less fights with the Love's Landscapes editor than if I used "...the 19th September" without the "of" that Americans would include.
Again, thanks for the educational response.
Eric


Is it meant to be solvable?

Is it meant to be solvable?"
Good point! LOL

It's easy! Just download or screen grab the cube. Next load it into photoshop or some simple paint program. Then color the squares to match the solution.
Save that as a .jpg file and send it to all your friends saying you solved the cube. You really did solve it, just in a more creative way.


I also must complain that even this post is a form of self-promotion, so now I feel like more of a ho!
Books mentioned in this topic
The Pompeiian Horse (other topics)Gutter Sludge: Poems from Your Scary Ex (other topics)
The Fantasy Art of Oliver Frey (other topics)
Ethan, Who Loved Carter (other topics)
Zippadacious (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
John Byrne (other topics)Stephen Hawking (other topics)
Stephen Hawking (other topics)
Ursula K. Le Guin (other topics)
A.R. Noble (other topics)
More...
Not a full-blown anxiety attack or something, but just...very, very reluctant.
The book is Second Son.
I don't think there was ever a hardcover. I have a visual recollection of the paperback in my hand when it came out. It was extraordinary and left me, as they (I) say, bawling my eyes out. So very powerful.
That was...30 years ago? 40?
It's been out of print for a long time and my copy vanished with the winds of time and moves and stuff like that there.
But off and on I've thought of it, and wanted to re-read it.
Lo and behold...it's available as an ebook. Naturally I bought it.
So there's the desire to re-read and hopefully experience something that marvelous again, and then there's the fear that it's only time and imagination and "it's not all that."
Having spent the money I'm too cheap to let it go to waste while the book's pixels get all yellowed and musty-smelling with age on my Kindle.
Just...
Once more unto the words, dear friends, once more....
Or something.
Just a thought.
Eric