50 books to read before you die discussion

This topic is about
Jane Eyre
Book Discussions - 50 Books
>
Jane Eyre
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lisa
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jun 09, 2015 01:28AM

reply
|
flag

I'm currently up to the part where (view spoiler)

I just read The Museum of Extraordinary Things by Alice Hoffman in which Jane Eyre is one of the few novels the lead character has read. She identifies strongly with Jane Eyre and doesn't hold Rochester in high regard. She empathizes with Rochester's first wife.

Alice Hoffman is an author I'd forgotten about. I liked Practical Magic, I do remember, but I can't remember any of her other books. Oh, to have a razor-sharp memory again (haha)...

I think a lot of people feel that way. Always fun to follow up with The Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys' take on poor Bertha and the despicable Rochester.

(view spoiler)
For me, the prose is sensual, Bronte packs so much emotion into her characters. Her themes of morality, feminism and identity are so well expressed.




I read The Sun Also Rises about a million years ago and don't remember it! (also, The Great Gatsby, but I do remember a bit of it. I think.)

(view spoiler)


I can see why you forgot The Sun also rises. Despite my fellow readers raving reviews, I'm not impressed so far.

Unless it falls into my lap, I think I won't re-read it!



I just read Wide Sargasso Sea, which is the Jean Rhys "prequel" to Jane Eyre and tells the story of Bertha from both her own eyes and Rochester's. I really didn't care for it, and I think it's because it reminded me more of Wuthering Heights than Jane Eyre, more Emily Bronte than Charlotte.
Anyhow, it didn't give me a better opinion of Rochester, since he just comes across as someone who can't make up his own mind. And that's my only real complaint about him - he refuses to give Jane a chance to make up her own mind about her own life. He's tricking her, just as he was tricked. I understand the why of it, and the reality that, of course, she will leave him, but the dishonesty of it really bugs me! I think he's a very real character, a little bit of good and a little bit of bad, and I think a whole lot of people would behave exactly as he's done, but Bronte has hit on the one character flaw I personally really hate.
I agree, too, that it is heart-breaking. There really was no solution to the problem of their love!



The childhood in Gateshead and Lowood is much more interesting, then her actions as an adult. Why not to finish the book with a life of governess? Then it would an interesting romance. Maybe, a life as teacher would make me realistic. But all the non-sense, with a fortuane, uncle, new cousins, it's too much?!
Jane, in last chapters, learn St. John. He opens up himself, though through Jane's reflections. I don't like him. Maybe, for Jane being a pratogonist, I'm inclined to see him as a cold, hard missionary.
[spolier]
Though, plot develops quite unexpetedly, yet unbelievably. She doesn't love Mr. Rochester, then looks like his jealousy scheme takes place, Jane experience affection. Then, she horror-like scenes with a lunatic. I was frightened, really! And now she is departing, having they spent a great evening in trying to understand each other, to play with emotions, to show who is genius of morality, yet not to forget to pity the fallen ones.
Those few days of forlorn wandering was difficult to read, she is suffreing a lot, looks like by chance and because of impulse-driven intentions.
The contrast between Mr. Rochester and St. John, is it of importance to novel's plot? Nah, better this way. Did you get something out of it? Don't you find like two different plots? Jane changes her mind quit rapidly, between chapters. Yet with a scene it may be consistent.


The childhood in Gateshead and Lowood is ..."
I have learned that the keys to a good book lies in the introduction and it is worthwhile paying attention to it. I will agree the story of Jane Eyre is far fetched, but it is darn good literature. What I see in Jane Eyre is a women of great strength. Where did that come from? She could stand up to Mr. Rochester from day one. She obliged him, but there was no brown-nosing. She had the capability to freely forgive Mrs. Reed. She could also face St. John and while indebted to him, still stand up for herself. That takes character.
This character is formed prior to her arrival at Thornfield. Her friend Helen Burns had an enormous influence on Jane. And yes, the religious portion is important also. We should not make the mistake of assuming every religious sentiment represents what Charlotte Bronte or Jane Eyre believed. Some of it is there for contrast, which I believe is the case for both Mr. Brocklehurst and St. John views. It is more Helen Burn that shapes Jane Eyre's views. Helen lived her life in view of an eternal hope in heaven and a faith in God and so did Jane.

[spoiler]
Are there any proofs, that Jane believed in God, so that to accept being a wife of St. John, and follow him to Aisa? I've stoped at the moment, when she finally accepts his proposal. But the end is yet to be read tomorrow.

When I read these old books I have to remember that they were written in a very different time and culture. I think you are right Brit that the childhood helped mold her. Also some people are born with a strong temperament. I think she was analytical from the start and instinctively recognized ill treatment when she saw it. Some people would assume that if they were being treated badly as a child, they deserved it, i.e., that they were "bad.". I think she recognizes that the adults are at fault.
Obviously the Bible is one of the books on the list because it does heavily influence western culture. If we were reading books written by chinese or hindu authors, we'd be reading about buddha and hindu gods and how their cultures altered their behavior in light of what they had been taught. It is what it is. I get more worked up by the treatment of children and women in this time frame. Women had no choices. Children were property. and then the class system? oy!




I don't think you are contracting yourself. What we are dealing with is a shared Christian value system. That does not require that all are believing Christians. Some were, and some were not. By the way, Charlotte Brontë's father was an Irish Anglican clergyman.
Carol wrote: "I think you are right Brit that the childhood helped mold her. Also some people are born with a strong temperament. I think she was analytical from the start and instinctively recognized ill treatment when she saw it."
When I watched the Jane Eyre adaptations, I always wondered why she could speak to Mr. Rochester the way she did. She was never scared of speaking her mind, did not seem to shrink back from his brusk manners. I think the answer to that is found in the combination of her strong temperament, her childhood and Lowood experiences (good and bad) and the influence Helen Burns and her teacher and friend Miss Temple. This is almost entirely omitted in the adaptations.
BTW, I love the dialogue between Mr. Rochester and Jane Eyre. It is such rich prose.



Brit, I like that scene too. I think it is not actually strength of Jane's character that is amazing. You would rather follow her thoughts. From the beginning she seems quickly take certain position - to break with him. But have you noticed her being straightforward and restrained? It is even hidden from herself, when author shows her thoughts, I see her very epxerienced, she takes into consideration pleadings of Mr. Rochester, then she rejects them, at such a moments her person objectively most of time reclaims original decision. It is very mature behaviour, and resembles very broad mind. But, I repeat, we are not presented with a source of that. Nor Jane niether Bronte don't explain that. Yes, her preceeding life has been shown. Yet, all the conclusion upon this character are left to the reader.
I've not read books of such a style, and It is unusual reading experience to me.

Spoiler:
I'm at the point where she has just gotten to Thornfeld or whatever it is called. She has met everyone but Rochester. I am listening to it which makes it very interesting to hear the narrator's interpretation of it. I look forward to hearing the interpretation of her conversations with Rochester.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Thirteenth Tale (other topics)The Museum of Extraordinary Things (other topics)