The Orion Team. discussion
CONVENTIONS OF SPYING
>
Everyman or Smooth Operator.
date
newest »

I myself prefer category 2. I find it more believable when reading about someone who has a proper skill-set suitable to the situations that normally occur in spy fiction rather than an ordinary bloke who would probably be dead before he realized someone is trying to kill him.
My bookshelf and kindle reflect this preference. The only book with category one I can find is this:
Partly because I consider it one of Ludlum's best works, and an exemplar on how to write a solid conspiracy, but also because the main character is actually a stand-in for himself.
My bookshelf and kindle reflect this preference. The only book with category one I can find is this:

Partly because I consider it one of Ludlum's best works, and an exemplar on how to write a solid conspiracy, but also because the main character is actually a stand-in for himself.

Jack wrote: "It is my goal as a writer to never make my reader suspend disbelief. This is why I built my protagonist from a child. I do not like the everyman trope. Although, I was entertained by Jack Ryan. He ..."
Ah, yes Jack Ryan. He straddles the line slightly. Being a former Marine, he has the instincts which your usual everyman protagonist does not posses, and when things got rough, Mr Clark and Mr Chavez were on call to lend a helping hand.
Ah, yes Jack Ryan. He straddles the line slightly. Being a former Marine, he has the instincts which your usual everyman protagonist does not posses, and when things got rough, Mr Clark and Mr Chavez were on call to lend a helping hand.
Between these two, which do you prefer to read about? The clueless, everyman, who suffers and yet soldiers on due to sheer determination or the man who knows how to play the game as well as the opposition he goes up against?