The Next Best Book Club discussion
Revive a Dead Thread
>
APRILS GROUP READS ARE>>>>>
message 151:
by
Allison
(new)
Mar 24, 2009 01:23PM

reply
|
flag

I just want to say I'm really enjoying this group so far and it's really getting me to read more "adult" books because I do tend to stay in the YA world due to my job.
OK, im going to disagree. YA is a separate category. It has its own shelving area, same as adult lit, sci-fi, horror, mystery/suspence, journalism, self-help..... arent those all considered "genres"??
Then within each genre, you have sub-genres.
In either case, a book is a book is a book.
Then within each genre, you have sub-genres.
In either case, a book is a book is a book.

I'll prolly nominate it next month :P

I think it was a great suggestion. I love YA books and enjoy any opportunity to spread my love of young adult books to people who wouldn't normally pick one up. Isn't that sort of the point of book groups--to read books recommended by others that you wouldn't necessarily gravitate to yourself? To read new things, and enjoy them together?
No, it's not TECHNICALLY a genre. But I've never seen a library break down the YA books into genres--they generally all get lumped together. YA "category" then.

I tend to resist classifications into genre anyway because it relegates too much good writing into one "ghetto" or another. As a fan of SciFi, I am particularly sensitive to genre bashing. I feel we we should bless ourselves with all good writing no matter what genre some would choose to place it. In that light, I certainly hope that we select "Young Adult literature" for group reads. Some classify I Capture the Castle as YA fiction--I don't know. But I gave it five stars.
Perhaps, sometimes, I become too fearful of possible censureship in advance. And, of course, I am delighted that Lori once again has repeated her support for freedom of expression in all threads.
I became overly cautious earlier in the thread when the young reader expressed his concern about whether a selected book was appropriate for his reading. Lori, you handled that very well by steering him away from Fool A Novel. And you reminding him of our frequently uncautious behavior here.
I welcome young and (like myself) geriatric readers. Reading is a gift we should all share.
I certainly did not intend any criticism of anybody's behavior other than my own. My intentions were to protect our (and my) rights to uncautious behavior. Perhaps I overstepped.
Once again, please forgive any unintended implications I may have made.


genre: a class or category of artistic endeavor having a particular form, content, technique or the like. (Webster)
I'm not a librarian, I can't name all the genres, but they would include, sci-fi, fantasy, historical fiction, humor, westerns, literature, etc. YA isn't a genre any more than adult fiction is a genre because it includes all of those genres and more. No, surely it become YA (or adult) because of the target audience, not because of genre.
Fiona, I think you've hit on something in that some books are marketed to a wider audience. Does that make them YA? No. They are simply books that have a wider audience appeal. Do books that are specifically YA have a wider audience appeal? No.

Sorry if I was defensive. It was for exactly the same reason as your stated in your comment. As a YA fan, I'm "particularly sensitive to genre bashing". Or in this case "category" bashing.
I haven't read a lot of SciFi, because I was always wary that I wouldn't be able to picture what was going on in my head--reading a SciFi book isn't the same as seeing a SciFi movie, after all. But since I am a big Star Trek and Star Wars fan (plus BSG and Firefly), I've read a few recently, and really enjoyed all but one of them. I'm really excited that Hitchhiker's was picked for the group read. It's a terrific book.
Fantasy, on the other hand.... I have a harder time getting into those, although it really depends on the author/writing style/development of the book's "universe"/etc., obviously. As with any genre, you can have a great story, but if the writing's bad, the book won't be very good.
As a SciFi fan, do you feel like SciFi and Fantasy should be grouped together like they usually are? I've always wondered if other people thought it was strange to mix those two genres. SciFi and Fantasy are NOT the same thing. Just curious.

And yet people outside the target YA audience read YA books... Apparently "no" doesn't mean what I thought it meant. What's the definition of that word?
Mosca--See what I mean?


Thank you for you comment.
I really don't know whether SciFi and Fantasy should be classified together. Writing can be is so inventive that much of it defies categorization. For example:
Is The Time Traveler's Wife general fiction or science fiction?
Is Kurt Vonnegut Jr. general fiction or science fiction?
Is The Tempest by William Shakespeare fantasy, science fiction, magical realism, or classical literature?
Genres, I feel, should be used only as a general tool for description. Sometimes they get in the way to much.
For the longest time, I resisted reading fantasy; but lately I've been enjoying it. I think we all build our own fences.

I think of Judy Blume, whose early works were definitely children's books. As she grew as an author (or more likely as her children got older), her intended audience also got older.
I will acknowledge there are a rare few books that were initially intended as YA that have a wider appeal, such as the Harry Potter series. To me that's inexplicable, but you might have guessed that. ;) Books mentioned earlier in this thread, such as Jane Eyre, were written and published before there was such a thing as YA. YA is, by definition, fiction intended for people ages 12-18. I don't even *wish* I were 18 again, although 35 is a pretty dandy age and I might wish to time travel back to it.


Lori wrote: "Kristen, We could do that, sure. Do a regular fiction and a YA fiction.. perhaps that could be our categories for next month? What does everyone else think?"



That's funny. So did I.
Anyway, I'm done for the day. I can't handle being condescended to anymore. I thought that as we grew older, we were supposed to become more OPEN-minded, not CLOSED-minded. Apparently some of us have yet to reach that state of enlightenment.
"Enlightened" - freed from ignorance and misinformation


If I was to be 18 tomorrow instead of **, this very night I would be going to the premiere of The Exorcist and watching folk spew up over Waterloo Bridge afterwards.
If i were 18 again, Id be moving out of my dads place in florida, traveling for the summer up to canada, NY, and then landing my ass here in PA. I'd also be meeting my hubby for the very first time :) *sigh*



Don't leave the group--it was a great (and perfectly legitimate) suggestion.

heck no, most of us love YA! I think the point of this group is to try and have a wide variety of books to discuss...no book is out of bounds! This conversation is quite out of the ordinary for TNBBC, so don't be worried off :)

Here's the thing for me:
If you join this group, you must be prepared to behave in a mature, adult fashion. Age is not an issue, unless - of course- you are my sons age group (11-14)..... then we need to be discussing your participation here ;)
If you join this group, you must be prepared to behave in a mature, adult fashion. Age is not an issue, unless - of course- you are my sons age group (11-14)..... then we need to be discussing your participation here ;)

Did you want me to haul out my chick-lit soap box?
;)


Why would we exclude any type of reading if it promises an excellent and enjoyable experience?
TNBBC has proven to be a wide open group with a very eclectic collection of tastes and recommendations. I hope it stays that way.

Fiona, if you would like to discuss the qualities of chick-lit with me, I suspect the others would want us to take it to PM.



There was a discussion that started on the spring challenge about YA and I think that it sort of carried over here when it was suggested having that as a group read for May. This really has nothing to do with you.
I think it's a great idea and I'm almost 40. I hadn't read much YA till lately when my girls, almost 21 and 15 yrs.old, suggested me reading certain books. I have to say so far the books I have read I loved. Would I have probably looked to reading them if my girls hadn't suggested it probably not, and then I'd be missing out on some fantastic books. I think it's sad when people don't try different type books whether it be humor, YA, Sci-FI etc...
And if I were 18 again I'd be newly married and expecting my first baby. :~)

Hitchhickers Guide to the Galaxy sounds fun. My brother bought it to me when I was 13 (I'm 19 now...) and I still haven't actually read it so maybe it's about time I take it out from the bookshelf...On the other hand, I need to read another book first (and I'm a slow reader, usually only finishing 1-2 books a month when I have classes). I hope I get to finish it! It would be a good thing, especially since my brother has been very nice lately to me and well, he did buy it for me. :)

Lori wrote: "Kristen, We ..."
I think that is a good idea.


Books mentioned in this topic
The Shadow of the Wind (other topics)Persuasion (other topics)
The Book Thief (other topics)
Parlor Games (other topics)
The Serious Kiss (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
William Shakespeare (other topics)Kurt Vonnegut Jr. (other topics)
Terry Pratchett (other topics)
Neil Gaiman (other topics)
Louise Erdrich (other topics)
More...