Mock Newbery 2026 discussion
Newbery 2014
>
It's Never too Early to Start...
message 151:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Aug 06, 2013 06:46AM
I really liked What I Found In The Sofa. Liked but didn't love Doll Bones.
reply
|
flag



It reminded me a lot of Okay for Now: a too obvious parallel, the voice seemed flat and i just didn't care for the characters very much, and the plot in a way could be classified as complex - but to me felt overdone, just throw everything in and the kitchen sink while you're at it.
I know I'm in the minority, as well. But there's got to be something better, right?


First, let me say that I totally get the confusion you feel when everyone is raving about a book you think is just OK. That happened to me last year with Wonder. I really like Wonder, I was just sharing it with my students, Friday, but I never thought it was Newbery worthy. So yeah, I get it.
As to your objections. The narrator might have been unremarkable, but I think that's because he was eclipsed by Early. You can't really have a discussion of characters in this book, and totally leave Early out of it. I think he's the best character of kid's kit this year (so far). I genuinely missed him when the book was over. As for Pi, I don't think he's supposed to be believable. He's supposed to be a fictional character in Early's head.
As for coincidences, I think if Early thought like you or me, he would have tried to find the bear anyways because he saw Fisher in that picture, but since he's Early, and different, he thought he was following Pi's story. He was actually following a lead from the picture.
Now what I loved about it. The writing was beautiful from start to finish. I listened to a lot of Billie Holliday while reading this book (and yes it was raining all summer) and it was really a phenomenal reading experience. I hiked a bit of the AT last year, and Vanderpool's decriptions really broughht me back. But what I really loved most was Early. Plain and simple. He's a beautiful character and I'm never going to forget him.
I could go on forever, and probably will, when I'm defending this book on Heavy Medal (this is just a warm up :)) but that's pretty much why I love this book, and hope it wins. I understand the dislikes, but I just wanted to say that there are some of us who don't feel that way. Happy reading!

I enjoyed Tangle of Knots as well. Appealing characters. Those delicious cake recipes. (Just imagining the smell of those cakes baking made the experience of reading the book more pleasant!) But when do plot coincidences become plot contrivances? The reader knows everything is going to be tidied up neatly at the end (there's a reason why the book is called A Tangle of Knots...). The book is nicely enough written that the foreshadowing in the plot is not grating. But probably not a Newbery contender.

I'm kind of surprised Hattie Ever After is being discussed as Newbery-appropriate. I loved Hattie Big Sky and can understand the Newbery recognition - the character Hattie could have been any age from 14 on up and she was one heck of a spunky gal with lots of appeal to young readers. But in the sequel, Hattie is portrayed as a young adult dealing with a variety of adult issues. More Printz-appropriate to me (though not as "edgy" a book as Printz winners seem to be these days...)





We can discuss whether we think the ASLC should adjust the guideline to twelve, so that YALSA is the only one taking care of teens - and thus would avoid the overlap (I'm in favor of this) but I'm not sure that's feasible..?



(sorry, this reply is a little longwinded!)
An interesting idea. At our (public) library, we divide our fiction collection into books of general interest to readers in grades 3 to 6 ("juvenile") and to readers in grades 6 to 12 (teen/adult). Books with youthful protagonists are likely to go into the older collection if the book has explicit sex/violence, is too romance-oriented for younger kids, or is full of cultural references that a typical middle grader would be unlikely to pick up on, and therefore would be less likely to fully understand or appreciate. (I do some after-the-fact reclassification if a book does not circulate in its initially-assigned category.)
I make these decisions based somewhat on my long experience with supervising two book discussion groups for the library, one for kids in grades 4 to 6, and one for kids in grades 7 and 8 (with some stragglers from grade 9). (10 - 15 kids in each group, avid readers all, who attend monthly meetings throughout the school year).There are no assigned books for these groups; I bring the newest juvenile and teen novels to the meetings of the respective groups.
And the one thing that these kids cannot - or will not - deal with - is an overemphasis on a romantic relationship in a book before they are developmentally ready for it. They blithely read and report on every Dashner/Horowitz/Colfer, (etc., etc.) book available with no comment whatsoever on the "action", but if a romance is too strong a feature of the book, they will note it and dismiss it as "adult"! (Of course, as the kids get older, the girls find the limited number of romantic books I bring to the 7th/8th grade meetings more appealing.)
I think that The House of the Scorpion appeals to a wide range of readers (as reflected in its receiving both the Newbery and Printz awards - and, in my town, being on both the middle and high school summer reading lists at various times) because the action in the plot could happen to a child of any age; Hattie Ever After, not so likely.

In a similar way I hope the committee considers "The President Has Been Shot!": The Assassination of John F. Kennedy, while published YA, I think could appeal to the upper end of the Newbery crowd. My daughter has long been fascinated with bodies and is interested in current events - I can see her liking this book a lot. I may have her wait until she's ten, but when I considered that I read How They Croaked: The Awful Ends of the Awfully Famous with her, which includes entertaining non-fic descriptions of death - including the guillotine - she would probably be able to handle a description of JFKs shooting and death. I certainly hope she knows and reads about the topic before age 15.
Just my two cents :-).
What I would give to be a fly in the room of the committee meetings.

Maybe the JFK book will be this year's BOMB!

Then the school year started, a few weeks ago, and I'm seeing how much my fourth and fifth graders are loving it. One of my students is going as Eleanor for Halloween. A mom told me that her daughter is having to sleep with the lights on, but that she won't stop reading it. It has me wondering now. Is it a Newbery contender? I would love to see them jumping up and down with joy when I show them the awards ceremony in January, like they were last year for Ivan.


I think most of us would agree, we wish appeal was a factor during the awards consideration, but to our dismay it is not... However, I've been generally pleased with the committee's decisions since Gaiman's The Graveyard Book was awarded the medal. My opinion is stricltly based on the quality of the writing, the character development, theme, pacing etc. I felt the theme in Hattie Ever After was particularly strong, and for upper-grade girls who have that dreamer quality and perhaps grew up on the American Girl series or Dear America, this title would have an appeal. Just my opinion. So glad I could generate a little discussion about this book.






I have read The True Blue Scouts of Sugar Man Swamp and really enjoyed it, but my favorite so far is Counting by 7s. I also liked Navigating Early, A Tangle of Knots and Zebra Forest but was not impressed with The Real Boy

"




A few comments:
Amy Timberlake also wrote the novel, THAT GIRL LUCY MOON.
Kids have individual tastes in books, just as adults do. I know, "Duh!" But I think we need to realize that if a book is published for that Newbery age range, then it probably will be the right book for some kids.
I had trouble dragging myself through Dead End in Norvelt but can see why some readers love it. And meeting and hearing certain authors (Jon Scieszka and Gary Paulsen, for example) would make most of us fans forever. If I listened to Jack G. read DEAD END, I might love it.
What I've read so far: A TANGLE OF KNOTS, COUNTING BY 7'S, HIDDEN SUMMER, THE THING ABOUT LUCK, THE YEAR OF BILLY MILLER, ONE CAME HOME, and RUMP. At this point, if I had to pick from those, LUCK and BILLY would be my top picks. But I'd need to reread to be sure.






Books mentioned in this topic
Fortunately, the Milk (other topics)Flora & Ulysses: The Illuminated Adventures (other topics)
Counting by 7s (other topics)
Paperboy (other topics)
Navigating Early (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Jonathan Stroud (other topics)Jennifer A. Nielsen (other topics)
Megan Whalen Turner (other topics)
Jessica Day George (other topics)