Glens Falls (NY) Online Book Discussion Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ABOUT BOOKS AND READING
>
What are U reading these days? (PART NINE (2013) (ongoing thread for 2013)

Will do, Nina! Thanks for telling us about it:
Miss Buncle's Book



One thing I really enjoyed: sometimes dragons are referred to as 'wyrms', in this book the dragons were 'bookwyrms' and their hoard of treasure was books. I've never come across bookwyrms before, I don't know if this is unique in the genre but it was unique to me.
I decided to continue with the next book in the series, Fortune's Fool since I'll be sending these to a friend.

I LOVE that! Cool. :-)

Sorry I haven't been here lately. Goodreads isn't sending me email notifications. I'll have to look into that.
Meanwhile, I've started the following two audiobooks via audible.com:
The Private Lives of Winston Churchill by John Pearson
and
The Spectator Bird by Wallace Stegner
I'm enjoying them both. Trouble is, listening is so much easier than reading that I'm neglecting my current hard copy books!



Jackie, I read Chatterley a while ago. I remember enjoying it. I'll have to put it on my "read" shelf.

I wondered if the writing would still seem as good. After all, my introduction to Jakes was Brak the Barbarian. I have to say, the first book, The Bastard, didn't disappoint. I gave it 5 stars. My review is here:
http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...

I read the first 4 books in the "The Kent Chronicles". I started the fifth, The Titans, but never finished it. Other books were calling to me. I enjoyed the first four. It was fun coming across the historical figures.
I didn't know there was a TV series. Netflix has it listed but it's not available yet. I've put it on my Netflix "Saved" queue.
"The Kent Chronicles" (1974)
http://dvd.netflix.com/Movie/The-Kent...
"Based on the best-selling novels by John Jakes, this star-studded Revolution-era romp follows the fortunes of a young Frenchman as he immigrates to America and crosses paths with historical heavyweights like Benjamin Franklin and George Washington."
http://www.amazon.com/The-Bastard/dp/...
The Bastard (1978): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077212/?...
The Rebels (1979): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079877/?...
The Seekers (1979): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079783/?...


ly recommend.

I read Lady Chatterley's Lover a while ago. I remember that it was a good read.
Audible.com has 8 audio versions, each read by a different narrator. Below is a link to the list.
http://www.audible.com/search/ref=sea...
Each one has a "sample" which you can listen to by clicking on arrow next to the word "sample".

Thanks for the recommendation, Arnie. Audible.com has Timebends: A Life in an audio version. You can listen to a sample at:
http://www.audible.com/pd/ref=sr_1_13...
Maybe I'll get it.


The book I started reading today is also from Pro Se: The Pulptress. Both books are short collections of new stories featuring an action heroine protagonist; but where Senorita Scorpion was originally created decades ago, the Pulptress is a modern invention. Originally conceived just as a costumed character to represent Pro Se at book trade conventions, founding editor Tommy Hancock got the idea of endowing her with a mysterious backstory and letting some Pro Se authors feature her as a fictional heroine. I found the concept intriguing, so I'm giving the book "a go," as my Aussie kinfolks would say. :-)

Werner, What are the the "basic characteristics and spirit of the old pulps"?

https://www.smashwords.com/profile/vi...
It says: "Pulp Fiction, known by many names and identified as being action/adventure, fast paced, hero versus villain, over the top characters and tight, yet extravagant plots..."

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1477...
You can read some of the story at the above link.

The fiction printed in the old pulp magazines in their heyday in the 1920s and 30s (and they survived on into the 50s), encompassed a variety of genres and styles. To me, though, some of the common elements of what we might call its "spirit" are a celebration of individual human freedom and capability; an optimistic view of the universe (evil exists and has power, but good is ultimately more powerful); and a grounding in traditional moral truths, taken seriously. (Some might argue that pulp noir is an exception to the last two --but I've discovered that that's far from always the case.)
I'd say that some of the defining characteristics are strong emphasis on action and adventure; appeal to reader's emotions (after the triumph of Realism in mainstream fiction, Romanticism refused to die, and the pulp tradition remains one of its strongholds); often use of extreme or exotic situations and settings; protagonists with heroic qualities; an emphasis on strong, plotted storytelling, and eschewing of "experimental" or "avant garde" fictional techniques; and restraint in the use of bad language and depiction of sex --classic pulp writers weren't Victorian, but they did employ good taste. (There's also some restraint in the handling of violence, and not a lot of gratuitous blood and gore; pulp fiction is often violent, but the descriptions don't wallow in sadism, and where the effect of horror is sought, it's achieved more by psychological means than by depictions of torture and dismemberment as it is in a lot of modern "horror.")
You can get more of a feel for pulp literature by reading some examples of it than by reading any description of it. From what I know of your tastes, though, Joy, I'm not sure that most of it would be exactly up your alley. (I could be wrong about that, of course!)

I read the first few paragraphs of
I wasn't drawn in. Too much description was given before they put the hook in. So I lost interest.
(e.g., "...the short heavy bellied man ran his sausage like digits through what few strands of greasy black hair clung to his splotched pate." [from "Black Mask, Big City") Such a long sentence before I was made curious about him and how he fit into the plot. Didn't work for me. But that was a short test and I may have been biased before I began.



Interestingly, I read the same sentence you quoted, and was drawn in by that and the rest of the description. I could totally visualize this guy, and his thug partner, and my curiosity was piqued as to what they were up to. (That's a perfect illustration of the fact that it would be a dull world if we all liked the same things! :-) )

As a description, the words about the "heavy bellied man" were good, but their placement at the beginning, without any orientation as to what was going on, made me lose interest. I've always needed orientation. I don't like jumping into the middle of a scene. The author starts the scene with the man saying: "Too public if you ask me." Right away, I said to myself: "Huh? What does THAT mean?" The description followed. I had already lost interest! But that's just me. :)

The artistic technique of starting a story/novel or a film in the middle of the action is called beginning "in medias res," a Latin loan phrase for "in the middle of things." It's favored by writers who want to avoid initial exposition and infodumps, and to fill the reader in as things develop. But you're right that with this type of opening, you start out much less oriented than you'd be if the writer used a different strategy; and this technique doesn't work for every reader.

Examples of two books which were almost impenetrable for me because of the lack of exposition were: The English Patient and All the Pretty Horses. I didn't appreciate the ambiguity in either of them even though I recognized the literary worth of the writing styles. Unfortunately much modern literature tends have that ambiguous atmosphere. It makes it tough on people like me. :)


Werner, in regard to ambiguity & opacity, below are some amusing quotations related to the subject:
=======================================================
"What she lacked in talent, she made up for in opacity." -Garrison Keillor on Gertrude Stein
"Don't express your ideas too clearly. Most people think little of what they understand, and venerate what they do not." -Baltasar Gracian (1601-1658)
"If everybody came to agree that stories should be told this clearly, the professors of literature would be out of a job, and the writers of obscure, encoded fiction would be, not honored, but pitied for their impenetrability." -Orson Scott Card, in the preface to his book, _Ender's Game_.
"Keating leaned back with a sense of warmth and well-being. He liked this book. It had made the routine of his Sunday morning breakfast a profound spiritual experience; he was certain that it was profound, because he didn't understand it." -Ayn Rand, _The Fountainhead_, [1943]
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure pure reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" -Bill Watterson's "Calvin" cartoon - SEE CARTOON AT: http://blog.sagrader.com/2011/01/11/c...
"That must be wonderful; I have no idea of what it means." -Moliere
=========================================================
I collect this stuff in my quotations file. :) Great hobby!

"I quote others only in order the better to express myself." - Michel de Montaigne.

======================================================
"Stygian gloom" is a phrase borrowed in a sense from Greek mythology. The word "Stygian" comes directly from Greek myths -- it's related to the River Styx, which the Greeks believed formed the border between Earth and Hades (the Underworld). The souls of the dead were taken across the river by Charon in his ferryboat. As you can imagine, places of the dead are usually fairly dismal, so "Stygian" became an adjective used to describe something that was dark and gloomy. So, the phrase "Stygian gloom" means a gloom that's about as gloomy as you can get."
FROM: http://www.reference.com/motif/arts/s...
========================================================
Here's an example: "about the electoral convulsion which swept Attlee into power and Churchill out. No one in the know expected it. ... Churchill was devastated. 'It was a tremendous, humiliating blow. We had lunch in Stygian gloom,' said his daughter, Mary."
FROM: http://www.theguardian.com/media/2005...



Jim, of course, you're talking about Robert E. Howard and Conan. Interesting about his use of the word "stygian"! Thank you.

Oh, Nina, how awful! Such a loss, especially the 130 year old doll which you must have treasured! Exactly what part of the dishwasher did the mice chew?

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...


This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Birdsong (other topics)Anna Karenina (other topics)
Anna Karenina (other topics)
The Perfume Collector (other topics)
A Lycanthropy Reader: Werewolves in Western Culture (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Sebastian Faulks (other topics)Romeyn Beck Hough (other topics)
Colleen McCullough (other topics)
Simon R. Green (other topics)
Mildred Mastin Pace (other topics)
More...
Will do, Nina! Thanks for telling us about it.
Miss Buncle's Book